Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC
Marriage and Happiness

Marriage is often idealized as the pinnacle of love and fulfillment—a fairy-tale ending where happiness is guaranteed. The idea that marriage is a ticket to perpetual joy, however, is a misguided notion that sets couples up for disappointment. While happiness is an important component of a healthy marriage, entering into matrimony with the sole purpose of achieving personal happiness is a fundamentally flawed premise. True marital satisfaction comes from commitment, mutual growth, and shared purpose rather than the fleeting emotion of happiness.

Happiness is Not a Constant State

One of the greatest misconceptions about marriage is that it will sustain perpetual happiness. However, research in psychology suggests that happiness is a fluctuating emotional state influenced by numerous factors, including individual well-being, life circumstances, and external stressors (Lyubomirsky, 2007). Expecting a spouse to provide continual happiness places undue pressure on the relationship, often leading to dissatisfaction when reality does not match expectations.

Studies indicate that while marriage can contribute to overall well-being, the “honeymoon phase” of heightened happiness typically fades within the first two years (Lucas et al., 2003). Once the initial excitement subsides, couples who entered marriage seeking continuous joy may feel disillusioned, mistaking normal relationship challenges as signs of incompatibility or failure.

Marriage Requires Effort, Not Just Emotion

Sustainable, long-term marriages are not built on transient feelings but on mutual effort and resilience. The work of Dr. John Gottman, a leading marriage researcher, emphasizes that successful relationships depend on factors such as emotional attunement, conflict resolution skills, and shared meaning (Gottman & Silver, 2015). Couples who focus solely on personal happiness often neglect the foundational aspects of a relationship, such as communication, compromise, and commitment.

Instead of seeing marriage as a source of happiness, couples should approach it as a partnership where both individuals strive to build a fulfilling life together. This perspective aligns with findings that marital satisfaction is linked to a shared sense of purpose and emotional support rather than just romantic bliss (Finkel et al., 2014).

Marriage is About Giving, Not Just Receiving

A marriage centered on individual happiness can quickly devolve into a transactional relationship, where each partner evaluates whether they are getting enough personal satisfaction. This mindset undermines the essence of marriage, which thrives on giving rather than just receiving. Research shows that acts of generosity and selflessness within a marriage contribute to deeper satisfaction and long-term stability (Algoe et al., 2010).

When individuals enter marriage with a self-focused mindset, they may struggle with the inevitable sacrifices and compromises that come with a shared life. True marital fulfillment arises when partners prioritize mutual growth, emotional intimacy, and a shared vision rather than individual gratification.

Happiness is a Byproduct, Not the Goal

When marriage is approached with the understanding that happiness is a byproduct of commitment rather than the primary objective, couples are more likely to build enduring relationships. Happiness in marriage stems from deep connection, shared experiences, and the ability to navigate life’s challenges together. Expecting marriage to provide happiness without effort is like expecting a garden to flourish without watering and tending to it.

Instead of asking, “Will marriage make me happy?” a more constructive question is, “Am I ready to commit, grow, and build a life with this person?” When happiness is viewed as a natural consequence of a healthy relationship rather than the sole reason for getting married, couples are better prepared for the realities of a lifelong partnership.

If the primary reason for getting married is to be happy, you may be setting yourself up for disappointment. Happiness is not a permanent state but a byproduct of commitment, mutual support, and shared purpose. A fulfilling marriage requires effort, resilience, and a willingness to grow together, rather than expecting one’s partner to be a constant source of joy. Those who enter marriage with the right mindset—one of dedication and mutual enrichment—are far more likely to experience lasting satisfaction and a deeper, more meaningful connection.


References

  • Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the Little Things: Everyday Gratitude as a Booster Shot for Romantic Relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233.
  • Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41.
  • Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining Adaptation and the Set Point Model of Happiness: Reactions to Changes in Marital Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.
  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want. Penguin.
Understanding the Differences Between an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) and a 504 Plan

For parents of children with disabilities or special needs, understanding the options available under federal laws can be crucial for ensuring that their child receives appropriate educational support. Two common frameworks—Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and 504 Plans—offer accommodating and services for students, but they serve different purposes and fall under separate laws. This article explains the key differences to help parents make informed decisions about their child’s education.

Overview of IEPs and 504 Plans

What is an IEP?

An Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is a customized program created for students who qualify for special education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This plan is designed to meet the unique needs of a student with a qualifying disability that impacts their ability to learn in a general education setting.

• Legal Framework: Governed by IDEA, a federal law ensuring services for students with disabilities (U.S. Department of Education, 2021).

• Eligibility: Requires a specific disability as defined under IDEA (e.g., autism, ADHD, speech/language impairments) that adversely affects educational performance.

What is a 504 Plan?

A 504 Plan provides accommodations to ensure that students with disabilities have equal access to education. Unlike an IEP, it does not include specialized instruction but focuses on removing barriers in the learning environment.

• Legal Framework: Governed by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination based on disability (U.S. Department of Education, 2020).

• Eligibility: Covers a broader range of disabilities that substantially limit one or more major life activities, including learning.

Key Differences Between an IEP and a 504 Plan

Feature IEP 504 Plan

Law IDEA Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act

Purpose Provides specialized instruction and related services. Provides accommodations to access the general education curriculum.

Eligibility Must have a qualifying disability under IDEA that impacts educational performance. Requires a disability that substantially limits one or more major life activities.

Services Includes specialized education services, therapies, and accommodations. Focuses solely on accommodations like extended time, preferential seating, or assistive devices.

Plan Development Developed by an IEP team, including parents, teachers, and specialists. Created by a school team, often with fewer formal requirements for input.

Review Process Reviewed annually, with a re-evaluation every three years. Typically reviewed annually but less formalized.

Examples of Support

IEP Services

• Specialized instruction in reading, math, or other subjects.

• Speech and language therapy.

• Behavioral interventions or supports.

• Physical or occupational therapy.

504 Plan Accommodations

• Extended time for tests and assignments.

• Preferential seating to reduce distractions.

• Access to assistive technology.

• Modified class schedules or reduced homework.

Which Plan is Right for My Child?

When to Consider an IEP

If your child has a disability that requires specialized instruction, an IEP might be the better option. This plan is tailored to address significant learning challenges and includes measurable goals and objectives to track progress.

When to Consider a 504 Plan

A 504 Plan may be appropriate for children who can succeed in a general education setting with specific accommodations. For example, a child with ADHD who needs extra time to complete tests but does not require specialized instruction could benefit from a 504 Plan.

How to Begin the Process

1. Request an Evaluation: Parents can request an evaluation through their child’s school to determine eligibility for an IEP or a 504 Plan.

2. Collaborate with the School Team: Work with teachers, counselors, and administrators to determine which plan best meets your child’s needs.

3. Review and Advocate: Regularly review the plan to ensure it continues to address your child’s needs. Do not hesitate to advocate for changes if necessary.

Both IEPs and 504 Plans are valuable tools to help students with disabilities succeed in school. Understanding the differences between these plans allows parents to better advocate for their child’s educational rights and ensure they receive the support they need to thrive.

This article has been written by John Collier, MSW, LCSW.

References

• U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov

• U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov

• Wright, P. W. D., & Wright, P. (2020). Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition. Harbor House Law Press.

• Bateman, B., & Linden, M. A. (2021). Better IEPs: How to Develop Legally Correct and Educationally Useful Programs. Attainment Company.

• Zirkel, P. A. (2022). The overlap and differences between Section 504 and IDEA. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 35(2), 88-96.

Supporting Veterans and Their Mental Health: A National Responsibility

Veterans have served their country with dedication and, upon returning to civilian life, often face numerous challenges that require our support and understanding. Many veterans experience significant mental health issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders. These challenges can hinder their ability to reintegrate into civilian life and maintain relationships, employment, and a healthy lifestyle. Recognizing the mental health needs of veterans and implementing effective support strategies is crucial for honoring their service and supporting their well-being.

The Mental Health Landscape for Veterans

Veterans are at a higher risk of mental health issues compared to the general population. A report from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) indicated that approximately 11-20% of veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan suffer from PTSD in any given year, and the prevalence is even higher among those who served in the Vietnam War (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022). Additionally, veterans are at an increased risk for depression, anxiety, and substance abuse issues, with research suggesting that over 25% of veterans experience symptoms related to depression and other mood disorders (Hoge et al., 2004).

A primary cause of these mental health challenges is the exposure to trauma and high-stress situations during service. Repeated exposure to combat, violence, and injury can leave lasting psychological scars that are difficult to heal. This stress may also exacerbate pre-existing mental health issues, making it even more difficult for veterans to transition back to civilian life.

Barriers to Mental Health Care for Veterans

While the VA and other organizations offer resources for veterans, barriers to accessing mental health care persist. According to the RAND Corporation, veterans may face significant obstacles, such as long wait times for appointments, stigma surrounding mental health, and a lack of providers who understand military culture (Tanielian et al., 2018). This stigma can prevent veterans from seeking help, as they may feel that mental health challenges are a sign of weakness or that others will not understand their experiences.

Rural veterans often face additional obstacles due to the lack of nearby mental health resources. Research has shown that nearly a quarter of all veterans live in rural areas, where specialized mental health services may be limited (Weeks et al., 2008). Telemedicine and virtual counseling have helped bridge some of these gaps, but there remains a need for more accessible, culturally informed care tailored to the unique needs of veterans.

Strategies for Supporting Veterans’ Mental Health

  1. Increasing Access to Mental Health Services:
    Expanding mental health resources specifically tailored for veterans is essential. The VA and other organizations are implementing initiatives to reduce wait times, increase the availability of telehealth services, and provide alternative therapies, such as art therapy, music therapy, and mindfulness practices (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022). Community-based programs can also provide veterans with accessible care, particularly in rural areas.
  2. Building a Community of Support:
    Peer support programs can be highly effective for veterans, as they allow veterans to connect with others who have had similar experiences. Programs like the Veterans Crisis Line and the VA’s Peer Support program connect veterans with trained peers, who provide support, understanding, and guidance. Research suggests that peer support reduces PTSD symptoms and increases veterans’ willingness to seek help (Resnick et al., 2012).
  3. Reducing Stigma through Public Awareness:
    Public awareness campaigns can play a crucial role in reducing stigma around veterans’ mental health issues. Campaigns should focus on educating both veterans and the general public about the commonality of mental health challenges, emphasizing that seeking help is a sign of strength. The VA’s “Make the Connection” campaign is an example of an initiative aimed at reducing stigma and encouraging veterans to pursue mental health treatment (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022).
  4. Encouraging Family Involvement and Support:
    Family members can be a crucial source of support for veterans dealing with mental health issues. Programs that educate family members about PTSD, depression, and other mental health conditions can equip them to support their loved ones effectively. Involving families in therapy sessions can also create a support network that extends beyond formal mental health services, which may improve outcomes for veterans (Monson et al., 2006).
  5. Employment and Reintegration Support:
    Meaningful employment can significantly impact veterans’ mental health and quality of life. Programs like the VA’s Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment services provide veterans with job training, career counseling, and job placement assistance, helping veterans reintegrate into civilian life (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022). Research shows that veterans who find stable employment report higher levels of satisfaction and mental well-being (Resnik et al., 2012).

A Call to Action

Supporting veterans’ mental health is not only a moral duty but also a way to ensure the well-being of individuals who have made profound sacrifices. By addressing the barriers veterans face in accessing mental health care, expanding peer support networks, reducing stigma, and providing employment and family support, society can help veterans lead healthier and more fulfilling lives. Moreover, these actions honor their service by providing the respect, care, and compassion they deserve.

We must continue to advocate for policies that support veterans’ mental health, fund research into effective treatments, and raise public awareness about the unique challenges veterans face. Providing veterans with the resources and support they need to thrive is one of the most meaningful ways we can repay them for their service and dedication to our country.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field and is based in London Kentucky through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Mr. Collier may be reached by phone at (606) 657–0532 extension 101 or by email at [email protected].


References

Hoge, C. W., Castro, C. A., Messer, S. C., McGurk, D., Cotting, D. I., & Koffman, R. L. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(1), 13-22.

Monson, C. M., Schnurr, P. P., Stevens, S. P., & Guthrie, K. A. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD: Pilot results from a community sample. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(3), 289-299.

Resnick, S. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2012). Integrating peer-provided services: A quasi-experimental study of recovery orientation, confidence, and empowerment. Psychiatric Services, 63(6), 541-547.

Tanielian, T., Jaycox, L. H., & RAND Corporation. (2008). Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery. RAND Corporation.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2022). PTSD: National Center for PTSD. https://www.ptsd.va.gov