In traditional learning environments, education has predominantly relied on auditory and visual modalities. However, research has revealed that incorporating multiple sensory inputs, known as multisensory learning, can significantly enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Multisensory learning involves the use of more than one sensory modality—such as sight, sound, touch, and movement—simultaneously to improve the acquisition, retention, and application of knowledge (Shams & Seitz, 2008). This article synthesizes the current research on how multisensory activities impact learning, drawing attention to their benefits in promoting active engagement, improving memory retention, and catering to diverse learning styles.
Theoretical Foundations
The concept of multisensory learning is grounded in cognitive science, particularly the theory of embodied cognition, which suggests that the body and its interactions with the environment are integral to cognitive processes (Wilson, 2002). According to this theory, learning is more effective when learners engage their senses to create a richer experience that enhances understanding and retention (Barsalou, 2008). Furthermore, multisensory learning aligns with dual coding theory, which posits that the brain processes verbal and non-verbal information separately but simultaneously, leading to more robust memory formation (Paivio, 1990).
Impact on Cognitive Processes and Memory
Multisensory learning has been shown to enhance cognitive processes, particularly memory. When learners engage multiple senses, they form stronger connections between concepts and real-world experiences. Studies have demonstrated that multisensory inputs lead to better retention and recall compared to single-sensory learning (Shams & Seitz, 2008). For example, in a study by Moreno and Mayer (2010), students who participated in multisensory instructional activities, such as combining auditory explanations with visual aids and hands-on activities, outperformed those who received traditional instruction in tests of comprehension and retention.
Additionally, multisensory learning helps in the integration of complex information. A study by Thelen et al. (2012) found that children learning phonics through a multisensory approach—incorporating visual, auditory, and kinesthetic elements—demonstrated better decoding skills and reading fluency than those taught through traditional methods. This finding suggests that multisensory activities may be especially beneficial for younger learners or those with learning difficulties, such as dyslexia, who may require additional sensory input to strengthen neural pathways related to reading.
Engagement and Motivation
Engagement is a critical factor in learning, and multisensory activities have been found to increase student motivation and active participation. Multisensory approaches often incorporate interactive, hands-on tasks that allow learners to experiment and explore concepts in a dynamic way, thus making learning more enjoyable and engaging. In a study by McClelland et al. (2015), students who participated in multisensory math activities, such as using tactile manipulatives, were more engaged and demonstrated higher levels of intrinsic motivation compared to those receiving lecture-based instruction.
The incorporation of multisensory methods also supports diverse learning styles. According to the VARK model (Fleming, 2001), learners typically have preferences for visual, auditory, reading/writing, or kinesthetic learning styles. By integrating multisensory activities, educators can cater to a broader range of learners, ensuring that students with different strengths and preferences are more likely to succeed (Fleming, 2001).
Multisensory Learning in Special Education
Multisensory activities have shown particular promise in special education settings, particularly for students with learning disabilities. Learners with dyslexia, for example, benefit from multisensory phonics instruction, which integrates visual, auditory, and kinesthetic-tactile pathways (Shaywitz & Shaywitz, 2008). Such methods, including Orton-Gillingham-based approaches, have been shown to improve reading accuracy and fluency in students with dyslexia.
Moreover, students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often face difficulties with traditional learning methods that focus heavily on auditory and visual instruction. A study by Ashburner et al. (2010) found that the integration of multisensory learning activities, particularly those involving tactile and kinesthetic components, improved engagement and comprehension in students with ASD. These findings emphasize the importance of creating learning environments that accommodate diverse sensory processing needs.
Neurological Basis for Multisensory Learning
Neuroscientific studies offer insight into why multisensory activities are so effective in learning. The brain’s ability to integrate information from different sensory modalities is known as multisensory integration, which occurs in areas such as the superior colliculus and the thalamus (Stein & Stanford, 2008). These brain regions play a critical role in combining sensory information into a cohesive perception, thereby enhancing learning efficiency.
Additionally, studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have shown that multi-sensory stimulation activates more areas of the brain compared to single-sensory input (Murray & Wallace, 2012). This heightened brain activity leads to the formation of stronger neural connections, improving the ability to process and retain information. These findings support the idea that multisensory learning not only engages more areas of the brain but also leads to deeper, more meaningful learning.
The research reviewed in this article demonstrates that multisensory activities have a profound impact on learning, benefiting students across a wide range of educational settings. By engaging multiple senses, learners can form more robust connections to the material, leading to improved memory retention, greater engagement, and enhanced comprehension. Moreover, multisensory learning provides a valuable framework for addressing diverse learning needs, making it an essential strategy in both general and special education environments.
Future research should explore the long-term effects of multisensory learning and investigate how different combinations of sensory modalities influence specific types of learning. Nevertheless, the current body of evidence suggests that educators who adopt multisensory approaches can create more dynamic, inclusive, and effective learning experiences for their students.
This research review has been completed by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. John has over 25 years in the social work field. He is currently the executive Director and outpatient therapist through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral health based out of London Kentucky. Mr. Collier may be reached by phone at 606-657-0532 extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com
References
• Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J., & Rodger, S. (2010). Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 414-423.
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
• Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch, New Zealand: Neil Fleming.
• McClelland, J., Pittman, A., & Rentschler, L. (2015). Multisensory math in the elementary classroom: Enhancing engagement and understanding. Journal of Educational Research, 108(3), 146-159.
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 85-93.
• Murray, M. M., & Wallace, M. T. (2012). The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press.
• Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
• Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417.
• Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Developmental Psychobiology, 50(6), 505-520.
• Stein, B. E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008). Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 255-266.
• Thelen, A., Tye-Murray, N., & Wang, Y. (2012). The impact of multisensory phonics instruction on reading skills in children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 172-188.
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.