Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC

Tag personal fulfillment

Marriage and Happiness

Marriage is often idealized as the pinnacle of love and fulfillment—a fairy-tale ending where happiness is guaranteed. The idea that marriage is a ticket to perpetual joy, however, is a misguided notion that sets couples up for disappointment. While happiness is an important component of a healthy marriage, entering into matrimony with the sole purpose of achieving personal happiness is a fundamentally flawed premise. True marital satisfaction comes from commitment, mutual growth, and shared purpose rather than the fleeting emotion of happiness.

Happiness is Not a Constant State

One of the greatest misconceptions about marriage is that it will sustain perpetual happiness. However, research in psychology suggests that happiness is a fluctuating emotional state influenced by numerous factors, including individual well-being, life circumstances, and external stressors (Lyubomirsky, 2007). Expecting a spouse to provide continual happiness places undue pressure on the relationship, often leading to dissatisfaction when reality does not match expectations.

Studies indicate that while marriage can contribute to overall well-being, the “honeymoon phase” of heightened happiness typically fades within the first two years (Lucas et al., 2003). Once the initial excitement subsides, couples who entered marriage seeking continuous joy may feel disillusioned, mistaking normal relationship challenges as signs of incompatibility or failure.

Marriage Requires Effort, Not Just Emotion

Sustainable, long-term marriages are not built on transient feelings but on mutual effort and resilience. The work of Dr. John Gottman, a leading marriage researcher, emphasizes that successful relationships depend on factors such as emotional attunement, conflict resolution skills, and shared meaning (Gottman & Silver, 2015). Couples who focus solely on personal happiness often neglect the foundational aspects of a relationship, such as communication, compromise, and commitment.

Instead of seeing marriage as a source of happiness, couples should approach it as a partnership where both individuals strive to build a fulfilling life together. This perspective aligns with findings that marital satisfaction is linked to a shared sense of purpose and emotional support rather than just romantic bliss (Finkel et al., 2014).

Marriage is About Giving, Not Just Receiving

A marriage centered on individual happiness can quickly devolve into a transactional relationship, where each partner evaluates whether they are getting enough personal satisfaction. This mindset undermines the essence of marriage, which thrives on giving rather than just receiving. Research shows that acts of generosity and selflessness within a marriage contribute to deeper satisfaction and long-term stability (Algoe et al., 2010).

When individuals enter marriage with a self-focused mindset, they may struggle with the inevitable sacrifices and compromises that come with a shared life. True marital fulfillment arises when partners prioritize mutual growth, emotional intimacy, and a shared vision rather than individual gratification.

Happiness is a Byproduct, Not the Goal

When marriage is approached with the understanding that happiness is a byproduct of commitment rather than the primary objective, couples are more likely to build enduring relationships. Happiness in marriage stems from deep connection, shared experiences, and the ability to navigate life’s challenges together. Expecting marriage to provide happiness without effort is like expecting a garden to flourish without watering and tending to it.

Instead of asking, “Will marriage make me happy?” a more constructive question is, “Am I ready to commit, grow, and build a life with this person?” When happiness is viewed as a natural consequence of a healthy relationship rather than the sole reason for getting married, couples are better prepared for the realities of a lifelong partnership.

If the primary reason for getting married is to be happy, you may be setting yourself up for disappointment. Happiness is not a permanent state but a byproduct of commitment, mutual support, and shared purpose. A fulfilling marriage requires effort, resilience, and a willingness to grow together, rather than expecting one’s partner to be a constant source of joy. Those who enter marriage with the right mindset—one of dedication and mutual enrichment—are far more likely to experience lasting satisfaction and a deeper, more meaningful connection.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a seasoned clinical social worker with over 25 years of experience, serving the London, Kentucky area through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Known for his compassionate approach and commitment to quality care, Mr. Collier supports individuals and families with a focus on mental health and well-being. He is available for professional inquiries at (606) 657–0532, extension 101, or by email at [email protected].

References

  • Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the Little Things: Everyday Gratitude as a Booster Shot for Romantic Relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233.
  • Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41.
  • Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining Adaptation and the Set Point Model of Happiness: Reactions to Changes in Marital Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.
  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want. Penguin.
The Differences Between a Woman Who Wants a Husband and a Woman Who Wants to Be a Wife

The dynamics of modern relationships are increasingly complex, influenced by societal shifts in gender roles, expectations, and personal values. In the context of marriage, two distinct perspectives often emerge: the desire for a husband versus the desire to be a wife. While these may appear similar on the surface, they represent fundamentally different approaches to partnership and commitment. This article explores these differences and their implications for modern relationships.

1. Motivation for Commitment

A woman who wants a husband may be primarily motivated by the idea of companionship, societal status, or achieving a particular milestone in life. Her focus might center on what a husband can bring to her life—financial stability, emotional support, or social recognition. Conversely, a woman who wants to be a wife often emphasizes the role she seeks to fulfill within a relationship. Her motivation stems from a desire to nurture, build a partnership, and invest in the growth of the marital union.

Research on marital satisfaction suggests that intrinsic motivations, such as personal fulfillment and mutual support, are stronger predictors of long-term happiness than extrinsic factors like societal pressure or financial security (Amato, 2010). This underscores the importance of aligning motivations with the relational roles each partner seeks to embody.

2. Expectations of the Relationship

The expectations held by a woman who wants a husband may be more externally focused, often shaped by cultural norms or personal ideals of what a husband “should” provide. For instance, these expectations might include financial provision, protection, or fulfilling a traditional role within the family unit.

In contrast, a woman who wants to be a wife often adopts a more internally driven perspective. She focuses on what she can contribute to the relationship, such as emotional support, shared responsibilities, and fostering mutual respect. This aligns with the concept of communal orientation in relationships, where the emphasis is on meeting the partner’s needs without expecting direct reciprocation (Clark & Mills, 2012).

3. Approach to Challenges

When challenges arise, the difference in perspective becomes particularly evident. A woman seeking a husband may evaluate problems in terms of what she is or isn’t receiving from her partner. If unmet expectations dominate her perception, it can lead to dissatisfaction or conflict.

Conversely, a woman who desires to be a wife is more likely to approach challenges collaboratively, viewing them as opportunities to strengthen the relationship. This aligns with findings that couples who adopt a team-oriented mindset are better equipped to navigate conflict and maintain marital satisfaction (Markman, Stanley, & Blumberg, 2010).

4. Role of Personal Identity

For a woman who wants a husband, her identity may be intertwined with the social or cultural validation that comes with marriage. The title of “wife” may hold less intrinsic value than the societal perception of being married.

However, a woman who wants to be a wife typically views the role as an extension of her personal identity and values. She may find meaning in the responsibilities and commitments that come with the role, emphasizing personal growth and the deepening of emotional connections within the marriage.

5. Long-Term Compatibility

The difference between wanting a husband and wanting to be a wife has profound implications for long-term compatibility. Relationships built on the former may face challenges if external expectations are not met or if the relationship is not rooted in mutual understanding and shared goals. By contrast, relationships centered on the latter are more likely to thrive, as both partners invest in the well-being of the partnership, prioritizing collaboration over individual expectations.

Studies have shown that marital satisfaction is highest when both partners exhibit high levels of commitment and engage in behaviors that promote mutual trust and respect (Fowers & Olson, 1993). This suggests that aligning relationship goals and motivations is critical for a successful marriage.

Conclusion

The distinction between wanting a husband and wanting to be a wife reflects deeper differences in motivations, expectations, and approaches to relationships. While both perspectives can lead to fulfilling partnerships, understanding and aligning these differences is essential for building a resilient and harmonious marriage. Ultimately, the key lies in fostering a relationship based on shared values, mutual respect, and a commitment to growing together.

References

Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 232-250). Sage.

Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176

Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (2010). Fighting for your marriage: A deluxe revised edition of the classic best-seller for enhancing marriage and preventing divorce. Jossey-Bass.