All posts by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW

What does it mean to “Submit” to your Husband.
The concept of a wife submitting to her husband is often debated in religious, social, and academic circles. Rooted primarily in biblical teachings, submission in marriage is frequently misunderstood as a form of servitude or oppression. However, a comprehensive understanding of the term, especially in its biblical context, reveals a deeper, more nuanced perspective that emphasizes mutual respect, love, and partnership.

The Biblical Basis of Submission

The idea of submission in marriage originates from several passages in the Bible, with one of the most frequently cited being Ephesians 5:22-24 (New International Version, NIV):

“Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.”

At first glance, this passage may appear to suggest an unequal relationship, but when examined alongside other biblical texts, it becomes clear that submission is not about inferiority but about order and function within marriage.

In Ephesians 5:25, husbands are commanded to “love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” This indicates that a husband’s role is not one of dominance but of self-sacrificial leadership, mirroring Christ’s love for the church.

The Meaning of Submission

1. Submission as Mutual Respect

Biblical submission does not imply blind obedience or suppression of a wife’s voice. Instead, it represents a cooperative and respectful relationship. Ephesians 5:21 states, “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ,” highlighting that submission is a mutual responsibility, not a one-sided obligation.

2. The Role of a Husband’s Leadership

A husband’s leadership in marriage, as described in the Bible, is not about power or control but about responsibility and love. Husbands are called to lead their families in a way that reflects Christ’s sacrificial love. This form of leadership prioritizes the well-being of the wife and family rather than exerting dominance.

3. Submission Does Not Justify Abuse

Many scholars and religious leaders emphasize that submission does not mean tolerating abuse or unhealthy power dynamics. Biblical submission is always within the framework of a loving, Christ-centered relationship. If a husband acts in ways that contradict biblical teachings—such as being abusive, manipulative, or neglectful—he is failing in his role as a Christlike leader (Colossians 3:19).

Cultural and Modern Perspectives

The interpretation of submission has evolved within different cultural and historical contexts. In many traditional societies, submission was often linked to patriarchal structures where men held absolute authority. However, modern Christian perspectives emphasize equality, complementarity, and partnership rather than rigid hierarchy (Piper & Grudem, 1991).

From a psychological standpoint, studies show that marriages characterized by mutual respect, shared decision-making, and emotional support tend to be healthier and more satisfying (Gottman, 1999). This aligns with the biblical model where both spouses contribute uniquely to the marriage while maintaining mutual love and respect.

Practical Application in Marriage

  1. Decision-Making Together – Biblical submission does not mean the husband makes all decisions unilaterally. Rather, both spouses should engage in open communication and decision-making, with the husband leading in a way that prioritizes the family’s well-being.
  2. Honoring Each Other’s Strengths – A successful marriage recognizes and appreciates the unique gifts and strengths each partner brings. Submission does not mean that the wife’s opinions or contributions are less valuable.
  3. Leading with Love and Humility – Husbands are instructed to love their wives as Christ loved the church, which involves humility, patience, and selflessness. True biblical leadership involves servanthood rather than authoritarian rule (Mark 10:42-45).

Submission in marriage, as outlined in the Bible, is not about control or oppression but about love, respect, and partnership. When understood in its proper context, biblical submission enhances marital unity, fosters mutual support, and aligns with the Christian model of love and service. Both spouses are called to honor and respect one another, creating a marriage that reflects Christ’s relationship with His church.

This article was written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work and mental health field. It currently serves as the executive director and outpatient behavioral health therapist at southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health based out of London KY. john may be reached by phone at 6066570532 extension 101 or by email at [email protected]

References

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV)
  • Piper, J., & Grudem, W. (1991). Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism. Crossway.
  • Gottman, J. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
  • Keller, T. (2011). The Meaning of Marriage: Facing the Complexities of Commitment with the Wisdom of God. Penguin.

Would you like any refinements or additional perspectives included?

EVENING / AFTERHOURS COUNSELING APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE!!!!

We’re now offering telehealth and in-person evening appointments for Outpatient Therapy to better serve you and your family! Whether you prefer the convenience of virtual care or a face-to-face session after your workday, our compassionate team is here to provide personalized support for your mental health and wellness needs.

Take the first step towards achieving your goals in a way that fits your schedule.

📞 Call us today at (606) 657-0532 to book your appointment!
🌐 Visit our website at www.sekybh.com for more information.

Your health and well-being are our priority. Let us help you thrive!

Make an Appointment

Understanding the Difference Between Feeling Needed and Feeling Wanted in a Relationship

Relationships are complex and multifaceted, with various emotional dynamics contributing to their strength and longevity. Two significant aspects of emotional connection in relationships are the feelings of being needed and being wanted. While these concepts might seem similar, they differ significantly in their implications for emotional health and the overall quality of the relationship.

Feeling Needed: The Role of Dependency

Feeling needed in a relationship typically involves a sense of dependency. One partner may rely on the other for emotional support, physical care, or practical assistance. This dynamic can create a sense of purpose and validation for the person being needed, fostering a bond based on mutual support.

However, feeling needed can sometimes create an imbalance in the relationship. When one partner becomes overly dependent on the other, it may lead to feelings of burden, resentment, or burnout. Dependency-driven dynamics can overshadow personal autonomy, making it difficult for both partners to thrive individually. Research suggests that while interdependence can be healthy, over-dependence may signal underlying issues such as insecurity or fear of abandonment (Fournier, Brassard, & Shaver, 2011).

Feeling Wanted: The Importance of Desire

On the other hand, feeling wanted in a relationship emphasizes desire and emotional connection. Being wanted reflects a partner’s choice to be with the other person, not out of obligation or need, but because of genuine affection and attraction. This dynamic fosters a sense of value and appreciation, affirming that the relationship is built on mutual respect and emotional intimacy.

Feeling wanted contributes to a healthier relationship by encouraging individuality and personal growth. When both partners feel chosen and valued for who they are, they are more likely to experience satisfaction and happiness in the relationship. According to research, feelings of being desired and appreciated are essential for long-term relational stability (Gordon, Impett, Kogan, Oveis, & Keltner, 2012).

The Balance Between Being Needed and Wanted

Both feeling needed and feeling wanted have their roles in relationships, but the balance between the two is critical. A relationship that leans too heavily on need may lack the spark of desire and appreciation, while one that focuses solely on want might overlook the comfort and security provided by mutual support.

Healthy relationships often incorporate aspects of both dynamics, where partners feel a sense of purpose in supporting one another while also cherishing the emotional connection and desire that make the relationship fulfilling. Communication and self-awareness are key in achieving this balance, as they help partners navigate their needs and wants in a way that benefits both individuals.

Conclusion

The distinction between being needed and being wanted in a relationship lies in the foundation of the connection. While feeling needed involves dependency and utility, feeling wanted revolves around choice and emotional desire. Both play important roles in maintaining a meaningful and balanced relationship. Understanding and nurturing these aspects can lead to stronger, more fulfilling partnerships built on mutual respect, care, and affection.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a seasoned clinical social worker with over 25 years of experience, serving the London, Kentucky area through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Known for his compassionate approach and commitment to quality care, Mr. Collier supports individuals and families with a focus on mental health and well-being. He is available for professional inquiries at (606) 657–0532, extension 101, or by email at [email protected].

References

  • Fournier, M. A., Brassard, A., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). Adult attachment and the dynamics of romantic relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 13(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/14616734.2011.549426
  • Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 257-274. doi:10.1037/a0028723
Double Standards in Relationships: What Do They Mean?

In relationships, fairness and equality are crucial for fostering trust and mutual respect. However, the concept of double standards often challenges these principles, creating friction and misunderstandings. A double standard in a relationship occurs when one partner applies different rules, expectations, or judgments to themselves compared to their partner. This imbalance can undermine the relationship’s foundation, leading to dissatisfaction and conflict.

Understanding Double Standards in Relationships

Double standards often manifest in expectations regarding behavior, roles, or responsibilities. These discrepancies can emerge from cultural norms, personal biases, or ingrained beliefs. For example:

  • Gender Roles: Traditional gender roles may result in expectations that men should provide financially while women handle household duties. If a partner criticizes the other for not fulfilling their “role” while not meeting their own responsibilities, it creates an imbalance (Ridgeway & Correll, 2004).
  • Infidelity and Jealousy: One partner may expect forgiveness for flirting or infidelity but become intolerant if the other exhibits similar behavior (Buss, 2017).
  • Freedom and Autonomy: A partner may demand personal space and freedom while controlling or monitoring the other’s activities, reflecting an inequitable power dynamic.

Causes of Double Standards

  1. Cultural Norms and Socialization: Society often reinforces unequal expectations, especially along gender lines. These norms can seep into personal relationships, perpetuating unfair expectations.
  2. Insecurity and Control: Double standards may arise from one partner’s insecurities, leading them to impose stricter rules on the other to feel more secure.
  3. Power Imbalance: When one partner holds more emotional or financial power, they might impose double standards to maintain control (Finkel et al., 2017).

Consequences of Double Standards

  • Erosion of Trust: When one partner perceives an imbalance in expectations, trust is often compromised.
  • Emotional Resentment: The partner subjected to the double standard may feel undervalued or disrespected, fostering resentment.
  • Inequality and Conflict: Unequal standards can lead to arguments, perpetuating a cycle of blame and dissatisfaction.

Addressing Double Standards in Relationships

  1. Open Communication: Partners should discuss their expectations and address perceived inequities.
  2. Mutual Accountability: Both partners must agree to hold themselves to the same standards they expect from each other.
  3. Therapeutic Interventions: Counseling can help identify and address ingrained patterns contributing to double standards (Gottman & Silver, 2015).
  4. Cultural Awareness: Recognizing how societal norms influence personal beliefs can empower individuals to challenge unfair expectations.

Conclusion

Double standards in relationships reflect deeper issues of inequality, insecurity, or societal influence. Addressing these imbalances requires self-awareness, open dialogue, and a commitment to mutual respect. By fostering equality and understanding, couples can create a foundation of fairness and trust, strengthening their bond.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a seasoned clinical social worker with over 25 years of experience, serving the London, Kentucky area through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Known for his compassionate approach and commitment to quality care, Mr. Collier supports individuals and families with a focus on mental health and well-being. He is available for professional inquiries at (606) 657–0532, extension 101, or by email at [email protected].

References

Buss, D. M. (2017). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books.

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2017). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 28(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1256692

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony Books.

Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on cultural beliefs in social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269