Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
When Little Stories Become Big Concerns:

Helping Young Children Learn the Difference Between Imagination and the Truth

Parents expect young children to have wonderful imaginations. A cardboard box becomes a rocket. A stuffed animal talks. A child can turn the backyard into an entire kingdom before lunchtime.

That imagination is a healthy part of childhood. But imagination can become much more complicated when a kindergarten-age child begins telling stories about real people and real events.

A child might tell a teacher: “My daddy is mean to me.”

Another might say: “Mommy hit me.”

Or:

“My uncle got mad and broke my Xbox.”

Perhaps the parent knows that nothing resembling the child’s version of events happened. That can leave parents embarrassed, frightened, angry, or wondering, Why would my child lie about something like that?

Before assuming that a 5-year-old is intentionally trying to deceive someone, parents need to understand what is happening developmentally.

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ HealthyChildren.org, children younger than 6 can still have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. The boundary between something imagined and something that actually happened may not be as clear to a young child as it is to an adult. [healthychildren.org]

Similarly, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry explains that children around ages 4 and 5 commonly make up stories and “tall tales.” This can be a normal developmental behavior because children enjoy storytelling while still learning to separate fantasy from reality. [aacap.org]

So the goal should not simply be“Stop lying.”

The better goal is: Teach the child how to recognize, describe, and communicate what really happened.


Why Would a Young Child Make Up a Story?

There isn’t one answer.

Two children can tell almost identical untrue stories for completely different reasons. Understanding the reason behind the behavior is often more helpful than focusing only on the inaccurate statement.

1. Imagination and reality are still developing

A kindergartener’s imagination can be incredibly vivid.

Suppose Dad turns off the television because it is bedtime. The child becomes angry and later tells the teacher: “My dad was really mean. He screamed at me all night.”

Perhaps Dad did not scream at all. The child’s statement may be less of a calculated accusation and more of an emotional version of events: “I was really mad at Dad.”

The American Psychological Association describes lying as a normal part of childhood development and notes that children’s ability to deceive is connected with developing self-control and understanding another person’s perspective. [apa.org]

Parents therefore have to teach an important distinction: Feelings are always real. Stories about what happened are not always accurate.

A child can truthfully say: “I was really mad at Daddy.”

That is different from saying: “Daddy hit me,” if no hitting occurred.


2. The child may be trying to explain an emotion

Young children do not always have the vocabulary to communicate complicated emotions.

“Mom is mean” might actually mean:

  • “Mom wouldn’t let me stay up.”
  • “Mom made me clean my room.”
  • “Mom took my tablet away.”
  • “Mom said no.”
  • “I was angry with Mom.”

Instead of immediately correcting:

“Your mother is NOT mean!”

try: “It sounds like you were angry with Mom. Tell me what happened.”

Then help the child replace the broad statement with accurate language: “Mom told me I couldn’t play Xbox because it was bedtime, and that made me mad.”

Now the child is learning something much more valuable than simply being told not to lie. The child is learning how to communicate accurately.


3. The story may get attention

Children quickly learn which stories produce reactions. Consider these two statements:

“I played with blocks yesterday.”

and

“My uncle got mad and smashed my Xbox!”

Which statement gets more attention? The second one probably produces questions, surprise, concern, and conversations between adults. Child Mind Institute notes that children can lie for several reasons, including getting attention, testing a new behavior, improving how others see them, avoiding consequences, dealing with anxiety, or responding impulsively. [childmind.org]

If dramatic stories repeatedly create large amounts of adult attention, the child’s storytelling can accidentally be reinforced. That doesn’t mean adults should ignore concerning statements. It means they should respond calmly rather than dramatically.


Always Take Safety Statements Seriously

There is an extremely important distinction parents, teachers, and caregivers must make.

If a child says: “Mommy hit me.”

do not simply answer: “You’re lying.”

Statements involving abuse, inappropriate touching, threats, violence, fear, neglect, or someone hurting the child should be taken seriously and handled using appropriate school, clinical, or child-safety procedures. At the same time, adults should avoid interrogating or repeatedly questioning a young child. A better initial response may be: “Thank you for telling me. Tell me what happened.”

Allow the child to describe the event rather than supplying possibilities. This distinction matters because teaching honesty must never teach children that adults won’t believe them when something genuinely happens.


Other Reasons Children May Tell Untrue Stories

Avoiding consequences

A child knocks over a lamp.

“Who did this?”

“The dog knocked it over.”

Fear of punishment can make denial attractive. The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically identifies fear of disappointing parents or being punished as reasons children may lie. It also warns that extreme parental reactions can make children more likely to use lying as protection. [healthychildren.org]

Wishful thinking

Sometimes children tell the world the way they wish it were.

“We’re getting a puppy tomorrow!”

Nobody is getting a puppy.

The child may simply desperately want one.

Making a boring story exciting

“My uncle accidentally moved my Xbox.”

may become:

“My uncle got mad and threw my Xbox across the room!”

The child’s storytelling ability has developed faster than their understanding of when creative embellishment is appropriate.

Avoiding embarrassment

A child falls at recess and tells classmates:

“Someone pushed me.”

The real problem may be embarrassment rather than dishonesty for personal gain.

Testing cause and effect

Children experiment.

“What happens if I say this?”

Child Mind Institute specifically identifies testing out a new behavior as one reason children lie. [childmind.org]


Don’t Give a Kindergarten Child a Permanent Label

One of the most important things parents can do is separate the child from the behavior.

Avoid: “You’re a liar.”

Instead say: “That story wasn’t what really happened.”

There is an enormous psychological difference. One defines the child’s identity. The other identifies a behavior that can be corrected.

Parents want the child thinking: “I told something that wasn’t true, and I can fix it.”

Not: “I’m a bad kid.”

Child Mind Institute similarly recommends avoiding labels such as “liar” and instead helping children practice truth-telling and giving them opportunities to correct what they said. [childmind.org]


Teach Three Categories: Real, Pretend and Mistake

One simple activity can work particularly well with kindergarten-age children.

Create three categories:

REAL

Something that actually happened. “We went to Grandma’s house Saturday.”

PRETEND

Something imagined for fun. “A dinosaur lives in Grandma’s basement.”

MISTAKE

Something you thought happened but later discovered wasn’t right. “I thought Dad took my toy, but it was under my bed.”

This third category is important. Children need to know that being wrong doesn’t automatically make them dishonest.


Activity: The Truth Detective

Turn learning into a game.

Tell the child several statements:

  • “We ate breakfast this morning.”
  • “An elephant drove me to work.”
  • “You have three hundred brothers.”
  • “We went to the store yesterday.”
  • “A dragon sleeps in our garage.”

Ask:

“Truth, pretend, or mistake?”

Then reverse roles. Let the child create statements and make the adult figure them out. The important rule is: Pretending is wonderful when everybody knows we’re pretending. This allows parents to encourage imagination without confusing imagination with factual communication.


Activity: Let’s Try That Story Again

When a child gives an obviously inaccurate account, avoid immediately launching into a lecture. Give the child an opportunity to correct it.

Child:

“Uncle broke my Xbox.”

Parent:

“Let’s stop and think. Did Uncle really break the Xbox, or are we making up a story?”

If the child admits making it up: “Good job fixing your story. Now tell me what really happened.”

When the child tells the truth: “Thank you. Telling the truth helps me trust what you tell me.”

The correction itself becomes practice.


Give Children Better Words for Their Feelings

Some “lying” problems are really communication problems. Teach replacement phrases.

Instead of: “Daddy is mean!” teach: “I’m mad at Daddy.”

Instead of: “Mommy hates me!” teach: “I’m sad because Mommy told me no.”

Instead of: “My teacher is horrible!” teach: “I didn’t like what my teacher told me to do.”

Instead of: “My brother always beats me up!” teach: “My brother pushed me when we were playing.”

The goal isn’t to tell children what they are allowed to feel. It is teaching them: Say what you feel, and describe what happened accurately.


Create a Family Rule About Honesty

Keep the rule simple enough that a 5-year-old can remember it:

“In our family, it is always safe to tell the truth. We may still have to fix what happened, but telling the truth helps us solve the problem.”

That final part is important. If admitting the truth guarantees an explosive reaction, children have another reason to hide it. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends making clear that truthfulness matters while avoiding harsh punishment. Parents’ own honesty is also an important model for their children. [healthychildren.org]


Praise Truth-Telling, Especially When It Is Difficult

Imagine the child spills juice on the carpet. The child says: “I did it.” The parent might immediately want to talk about the carpet. First recognize honesty: “Thank you for telling me the truth.”

Then address responsibility: “Now let’s clean it up.”

This teaches two different lessons:

  • Honesty earns recognition.
  • Honesty doesn’t erase responsibility.

The child still cleans the mess.


Try a “Truth Reset”

Give a child a brief opportunity to reconsider. “I’m going to give you one minute to think about what really happened. Then we’ll start again.”

Afterward: “Okay. Let’s start over. Tell me what actually happened.”

A reset removes some of the pressure associated with being caught. It also provides practice using self-control before speaking.


Use Books and Stories

Children understand abstract concepts better through concrete examples.

Read a story involving honesty and pause occasionally:

“Was that something that really happened?”

“Why do you think the character said that?”

“How could the character fix it?”

“What could the character say instead?”

You can even make your child the hero of a homemade story:

Once there was a little boy who sometimes had stories pop into his head so quickly that they came out of his mouth before he stopped to decide whether they were real or pretend…

Let the child decide what the character should do next. That turns an uncomfortable behavioral issue into a skill-building exercise.


Parents and Teachers Need the Same Strategy

A kindergarten child spends much of the day away from parents. Consistency among the important adults in the child’s life can therefore make a major difference. Parents can talk privately with the teacher and say:

“We’re working on helping him distinguish between something that really happened, something he imagined, and something he wishes happened. If he tells an unusual story, please take any safety concern seriously, but when appropriate, you can also ask him whether he is telling you something real or telling an imagination story.”

Parents and teachers can use common phrases:

“Is this real, pretend, or something you’re not sure about?”

“Let’s slow down and tell what happened from the beginning.”

“How were you feeling when that happened?”

“Thank you for fixing the story.”

Consistency makes the lesson much easier for the child to learn.


Bring Grandparents, Babysitters and Family into the Plan

Children can become confused when different adults respond dramatically differently.

  • A grandmother may laugh at an exaggerated story.
  • A parent may become angry.
  • A teacher may ask repeated questions.
  • An uncle may say: “Don’t tell lies!”

Everyone has good intentions, but the child receives several different lessons. Instead, create a simple support plan.

The family’s response can be:

1. Stay calm.

2. Listen.

3. Take safety statements seriously.

4. Ask the child to distinguish real from pretend when appropriate.

5. Help the child restate what actually happened.

6. Praise the correction and honesty.

7. Avoid calling the child a liar.

Repeatedly hearing the same message helps the child learn the skill across settings.


Keep a Simple Parent-Teacher Pattern Log

If the behavior happens frequently, parents and teachers can collect information for two or three weeks.

Record:

  • What the child said
  • Where it happened
  • Who was present
  • What happened immediately before it
  • How adults responded
  • What the child appeared to gain or avoid
  • Whether the child corrected the story afterward

Patterns may emerge. For example:

Mostly after correction?
The child may be escaping consequences.

Mostly around peers?
Attention or social approval may be important.

Mostly fantastic stories?
Imagination may be playing a large role.

Mostly during difficult tasks?
Frustration, anxiety, attention or learning concerns could be contributing.

This turns the question from“Why is my child lying?” into the more useful question:

“What problem is this behavior helping my child solve?”


When the Story Is Serious, Don’t Conduct Your Own Investigation

Stories such as:

“Mom hit me.”

“Someone touched me.”

“Daddy said he would hurt me.”

are different from:

“We have twelve puppies at home.”

When potential abuse or safety issues are involved, adults should take the statement seriously and follow appropriate safeguarding procedures. Parents understandably want to determine immediately what happened. But repeated, leading questions can create additional confusion.

A teacher or caregiver can remain calm and listen without suggesting answers. That protects two important principles simultaneously:

Children must know adults will listen when they report something unsafe.

And:

Adults should not turn every unusual kindergarten story into an interrogation.


When Should Parents Seek Professional Help?

Occasional invented stories at kindergarten age are usually very different from a persistent behavioral pattern. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry notes that frequent or elaborate lying can sometimes accompany other emotional or behavioral difficulties and may warrant professional evaluation. [aacap.org]

Child Mind Institute similarly explains that habitual lying becomes more concerning when it causes significant distress or problems in the child’s functioning. [childmind.org]

Consider discussing the behavior with the child’s pediatrician or a licensed child mental-health professional when:

  • false stories become extremely frequent;
  • the behavior is damaging friendships or school functioning;
  • stories consistently involve serious allegations;
  • the child seems unable to distinguish fantasy from reality well beyond what is developmentally expected;
  • lying appears connected with significant anxiety, impulsivity, aggression or learning difficulties;
  • the behavior suddenly changes dramatically;
  • the child experiences significant distress; or
  • parents and teachers are unable to improve the pattern despite consistent intervention.

Professional assessment is not about giving the child the label of “liar.” It is about determining what need the behavior may be communicating.


A Two-Week Honesty Challenge

Families can turn this into a positive exercise. For 14 days, create one daily opportunity to practice honesty.

Day-to-day goals can include:

Days 1-3: Practice “real or pretend?”

Days 4-5: Practice naming feelings accurately.

Days 6-7: Practice telling what happened in the correct order.

Days 8-9: Read stories about honesty.

Days 10-11: Role-play mistakes and telling the truth.

Day 12: Practice a “truth reset.”

Day 13: Have the child teach someone else what honesty means.

Day 14: Celebrate the child’s progress.

Celebrate the skill, not perfection.

“I’m proud that you’re learning how to tell people exactly what happened.”


What Parents Should Remember Most

Kindergarten-age children are still learning something adults take for granted: our words tell other people what happened in the world.

A 5-year-old saying something untrue does not automatically mean that the child is manipulative, dishonest, or developing poor character.

The American Psychological Association describes lying as a normal developmental phenomenon and emphasizes teaching children honesty rather than viewing childhood lying only as misconduct. [apa.org]

Children need adults to teach the difference among:

what happened,

what they felt,

what they imagined,

and

what they wished had happened.

Those are remarkably complicated distinctions for a young mind.


Conclusion

When parents hear that their kindergarten-age child told a teacher, “Dad is mean,” “Mom hit me,” or “Uncle broke my Xbox,” the first reaction may be embarrassment, fear or anger.

Slow down.

Listen.

Take potentially serious disclosures seriously.

Then start teaching.

Don’t merely tell a child,“Don’t lie.”

Teach them how to tell the truth.

Teach the child to describe events accurately. Give them words for difficult feelings. Help them separate imagination from reality. Allow them to correct inaccurate statements. Praise honesty while still requiring accountability. Ask teachers and family members to reinforce the same skills.

Most importantly, create a home in which telling the truth is expected but also emotionally safe. A child’s imagination is something parents should protect. The lesson isn’t to stop children from telling stories.

It is to teach them when a story belongs in the world of imagination and when their words need to describe what actually happened.


About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor and the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. His career in social work and behavioral health has given him the opportunity to work with individuals and families facing trauma, mental health challenges, relationship difficulties, major life transitions, and the everyday struggles that shape human growth.

John writes The Mind’s Trestle Board as a place to explore the intersection of mental health, relationships, personal responsibility, faith, morality, fatherhood, emotional development, and the lifelong work of becoming a better human being.

His writing is grounded in the belief that growth does not require perfection. It requires honesty, humility, reflection, responsibility, and a willingness to keep working on ourselves. Through both his professional experience and personal reflections, he encourages readers to look beneath their immediate emotions and consider the values, choices, commitments, and relationships upon which a meaningful life is built.



References

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2017). Lying and children: Facts for families, No. 44. [aacap.org]

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2025). When children lie: What parents can do. HealthyChildren.org. The guidance notes that children younger than approximately age 6 can have difficulty separating reality and fantasy and recommends calm responses and modeling honesty rather than harsh punishment. [healthychildren.org]

Arky, B. Child Mind Institute. Why kids lie and what parents can do about it. Clinical expert Matthew H. Rouse, PhD. [childmind.org]

Koplewicz, H. S., MD. Child Mind Institute. (2025). When should you get help for a child who’s a pathological liar? [childmind.org]

Talwar, V., PhD. American Psychological Association. The truth about why kids lie. Speaking of Psychology, Episode 200. [apa.org]

Talwar, V. The Truth About Lying: Teaching Honesty to Children at Every Age and Stage. American Psychological Association. The book emphasizes staying calm, addressing motivation, using positive discipline, recognizing honesty, modeling truthfulness and encouraging open communication. [apa.org]


From Victim to Survivor: Reclaiming the Life That Was Never Theirs to Take

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

There is a difference between being a victim and living permanently from the frame of mind of a victim.

If someone abused you, betrayed you, abandoned you, assaulted you, neglected you, manipulated you, or harmed you, you may have truly been a victim.

That is a fact.

Calling yourself a survivor does not change the facts. It does not make what happened smaller. It does not excuse the person who hurt you.

It changes something else.

It changes who gets to write the next chapter.

A victim asks:

“Look what they did to me.”

A survivor eventually learns to ask:

“What am I going to do with my life now?”

That may sound like a small difference.

It isn’t.

It may be one of the most important changes that happens during healing.


First, There Is No Shame in Being a Victim

Before talking about a “victim mindset,” we need to be extraordinarily careful with our words.

A person who has experienced trauma may feel afraid, angry, powerless, suspicious, overwhelmed, or emotionally numb. These responses should not automatically be interpreted as weakness or a character problem.

SAMHSA describes trauma as experiences that can have lasting effects on a person’s mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being. It also emphasizes that people respond to traumatic experiences differently. Strong support and resilient qualities can influence how someone responds. Likewise, the American Psychological Association recognizes that trauma can have long-lasting psychological and physical consequences, including PTSD, depression, anxiety, sleep problems, dissociation, and other difficulties. So when someone has been badly hurt, telling them to “stop acting like a victim” can be cruel and clinically misguided.

There are times when surviving is enough.

Getting through the day is enough.

Staying safe is enough.

Getting out of bed is enough.

But there may eventually come a point when survival asks something more of us.

The question changes from:

“What happened to me?”

to:

“What happens next?”


The Victim Frame of Mind

The victim frame of mind is not simply sadness about something painful.

It occurs when the injury becomes the lens through which a person begins interpreting much of life.

Something terrible happened to me.

Therefore:

  • I am powerless.
  • People cannot be trusted.
  • My life will always be this way.
  • There is nothing I can do.
  • Someone else must change before I can heal.
  • My past determines my future.
  • What was taken from me can never be rebuilt.
  • Because I was hurt, I will always be broken.

These beliefs are understandable after trauma.

But understandable does not necessarily mean helpful forever.

One particularly important example is avoidance. VA National Center for PTSD explains that wanting to avoid reminders of trauma is common, but relying heavily on avoidance can worsen PTSD symptoms and make moving forward more difficult. A coping strategy that once helped you survive can eventually become the wall preventing you from living.

That is one of trauma’s cruel contradictions.


The Survivor Frame of Mind

The survivor does not pretend the wound never happened.

The survivor learns to carry the scar without allowing the scar to become an identity.

The survivor can say:

Yes, that happened.

Yes, it hurt me.

Yes, I have wounds from it.

No, it was not fair.

No, I did not deserve it.

And yes, I still have a life to live.

Research on resilience after trauma examines precisely this question: how people adapt following profoundly difficult experiences and how resilience can be fostered after trauma. Survival is therefore not denial.

It is not saying:

“It didn’t hurt.”

It is saying:

“It hurt, and I am still here.”


Victim Thinking Says, “They Have the Power.”

Survivor thinking says:

“I have choices.”

Perhaps you could not choose what happened.

You can choose what you do today.

You can choose whether to ask for help.

You can choose your boundaries.

You can choose whom you allow close to you.

You can choose whether to continue treatment.

You can choose whether the people who wounded your past are permitted to control your future.

Trauma-informed care itself recognizes the importance of safety, trust, collaboration, empowerment, voice, and choice in recovery. SAMHSA identifies these ideas among the central principles of trauma-informed approaches. That word matters:

Choice.

Trauma frequently involves losing control.

Recovery often involves discovering where control still exists.


“Why Did This Happen to Me?”

Nearly everyone who has suffered deeply has asked some version of this question.

Why me?

Why did they do it?

Why didn’t someone protect me?

Why didn’t I see it?

Why didn’t I leave sooner?

Why didn’t anyone believe me?

Those questions deserve compassion.

But there is another question that can eventually become more useful:

“Given that this happened, who do I want to become now?”

That question cannot rewrite yesterday.

It can begin changing tomorrow.


Survivors Learn the Difference Between Responsibility and Blame

This may be the hardest concept in the entire journey.

You are not necessarily responsible for what happened to you.

But you eventually become responsible for what you do with what happened to you.

Those are completely different statements.

If someone injured you, responsibility for that action belongs to that person.

Healing belongs to you.

That may feel terribly unfair.

It often is.

Sometimes another person creates the wound while you are left doing the work of repairing it.

But refusing to heal until the person who hurt you makes everything right can leave your future tied to the very person who harmed your past.

Your healing does not need their permission.

Your recovery does not require their understanding.

Your future does not require their apology.

Accountability matters. Justice matters. Acknowledgment matters. In fact, the American Psychological Association recognizes the potential importance of acknowledgment, apology, redress, and restitution in trauma recovery. But your life cannot always remain suspended while waiting for those things.


How Do You Become the Survivor?

There is no switch that suddenly changes someone from victim to survivor.

Healing tends to be a process.

Some days you may feel strong.

The next day, something may trigger an old wound and make you feel as though you have gone backward.

You haven’t necessarily failed.

Here are several places to begin.


1. Tell the Truth About What Happened

Survivorship doesn’t begin by minimizing the past.

It begins with truth.

It happened.

It hurt.

It affected me.

You do not have to defend the person who hurt you.

You do not have to rewrite history to make other people comfortable.

Healing requires honesty.

And sometimes that honesty needs to happen with a qualified mental health professional rather than alone.


2. Stop Making the Wound Your Identity

Notice the enormous difference between these statements:

“I experienced abuse.”

and

“I am damaged.”

Or:

“Someone betrayed me.”

and

“I am unlovable.”

An event is not an identity.

Trauma can influence identity development, and researchers continue to study the relationship between trauma exposure and identity. What happened may always be part of your story.

It does not have to become your entire definition.

You are more than the worst thing someone ever did to you.


3. Identify What You Still Control

Take a sheet of paper and make two columns.

I Cannot Control

  • What happened yesterday
  • What another person thinks
  • Whether someone admits wrongdoing
  • Whether someone apologizes
  • Whether everyone understands my story
  • Another person’s choices

I Can Influence or Control

  • What I do today
  • Whether I ask for help
  • My boundaries
  • Many of my daily choices
  • Whose advice I seek
  • Whether I participate in treatment
  • How I respond when old patterns appear
  • What kind of person I am trying to become

Spend less energy fighting the first list.

Invest more energy in the second.

That is where your power lives.


4. Recognize Avoidance

Avoidance can feel like safety.

Sometimes it is appropriate to avoid genuine danger. But avoiding every thought, emotion, place, relationship, or reminder associated with what happened is different.

The VA National Center for PTSD notes that emotional and behavioral avoidance can interfere with recovery and that effective PTSD treatments can help people learn to cope with trauma-related thoughts and feelings. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has similarly developed recovery materials specifically focused on identifying problematic avoidance behaviors and gradually changing behaviors that keep people stuck in trauma recovery. Courage does not mean never being afraid.

Sometimes courage is simply deciding:

“Fear is present, but fear is no longer making every decision.”


5. Build Boundaries Instead of Walls

Trauma may teach:

Never trust anybody again.

Healing teaches something more sophisticated:

Learn who has earned your trust.

A wall keeps everyone outside.

A boundary has a gate.

A survivor learns when to open it, when to close it, and who receives a key.


6. Allow Yourself to Receive Help

Being a survivor does not mean doing everything alone.

Actually, refusing every form of help can sometimes keep people isolated.

SAMHSA emphasizes safety, peer support, trust, collaboration, and empowerment as important elements within trauma-informed approaches. Help may include professional counseling, trusted friends and family, support groups, medical care, community resources, or spiritual support according to your beliefs and circumstances.

Strength isn’t proving that you need nobody.

Sometimes strength is finally admitting:

“I don’t have to carry all of this by myself.”


7. Give Yourself Permission to Have a Future

Trauma keeps pulling the mind backward.

Healing gradually teaches it to look forward again.

Make plans.

Set a goal.

Learn something.

Build something.

Reconnect carefully.

Create new routines.

Find something meaningful enough that tomorrow becomes more than another day spent thinking about yesterday.

This does not dishonor what happened.

It demonstrates that what happened did not win.


Forgiveness Is Not the Price of Admission

People are sometimes told that they cannot heal unless they forgive the person who hurt them.

I would be careful with that message.

Forgiveness may be deeply meaningful for some people, especially within their spiritual beliefs. But forgiveness should not be confused with denying harm, restoring an unsafe relationship, abandoning boundaries, or removing accountability.

You can heal while still saying:

“What you did was wrong.”

You can move forward without pretending it never happened.

You can have compassion and boundaries at the same time.


Survival Is Not Becoming Who You Were Before

Perhaps this is where we sometimes misunderstand recovery.

After something profound happens, you may never become exactly the person you were before.

That doesn’t automatically mean something has been lost forever.

Perhaps the goal isn’t to go backward.

Perhaps it is to move forward.

Wiser.

More discerning.

More compassionate.

Better acquainted with your boundaries.

More aware of your strength.

More intentional about the life you build.

Resilience research has increasingly examined not merely whether people endure trauma, but how resilience may be fostered following it. The goal isn’t to become untouched.

It is to become unowned by what touched you.


The Day You Become a Survivor

There may never be a ceremony.

Nobody hands you a certificate.

You probably won’t wake up one morning completely free from every painful memory.

Instead, the transformation may happen quietly.

One day you realize you haven’t thought about it for several hours.

Then perhaps an entire day.

You recognize a trigger and choose a different response.

You establish a boundary you once believed you couldn’t establish.

You stop explaining yourself to somebody committed to misunderstanding you.

You ask for help.

You laugh again without feeling guilty.

You make plans.

You love again.

You hope again.

And somewhere along the way, your vocabulary changes.

You stop saying:

“This is who I am because of what they did.”

And begin saying:

“This is who I am becoming despite what happened.”

That is the difference.

The victim’s story is centered around what was done.

The survivor’s story acknowledges what was done but slowly turns toward what comes next.


Conclusion: Take Back the Pen

You cannot erase pages that have already been written.

Some pages may contain things you wish had never happened.

Some contain loss.

Others contain betrayal, fear, grief, humiliation, abandonment, or pain.

There is no wisdom in pretending those pages aren’t there.

Read them when you need to.

Grieve them.

Talk about them.

Learn from them.

Get professional help working through them when necessary.

But eventually, remember something extraordinarily important:

There are blank pages after them.

And those pages still belong to you.

Being a survivor does not mean saying, “It didn’t hurt me.”

It means being able to say:

“It hurt me. It changed me. There were days when I didn’t know whether I could carry it anymore. But I am still here, and what happened to me will not be given the authority to decide everything that happens next.”

You didn’t choose every chapter.

But you can still take back the pen.


About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

John S. Collier is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor and the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. His career in social work and behavioral health has included years of work with individuals and families experiencing mental health concerns, trauma, behavioral challenges, relationship difficulties, developmental disabilities, and complicated life transitions.

He earned his bachelor’s degree and became a Certified Social Worker in 2004 before continuing his education and professional development in clinical social work. He became a Licensed Clinical Social Worker in 2010 and later earned the credential of Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor.

As Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, Collier works in behavioral health leadership, clinical services, organizational development, community-based behavioral supports, and advocacy for individuals and families throughout southeastern Kentucky.

He is also the author of The Mind’s Trestle Board, where he writes about mental health, relationships, masculinity, family, morality, personal responsibility, faith, emotional growth, and the difficult process of becoming a better version of ourselves. His writing often draws from the intersection of clinical experience, human behavior, personal reflection, and the belief that people should never be reduced to the worst moment of their lives.


References

American Psychological Association. (2024). Individual, collective, and intergenerational trauma recovery: Considering the restorative roles of restitution and reparations.

American Psychological Association. Nugent, N. R., Sumner, J. A., & Amstadter, A. B. (2014). Resilience after trauma: From surviving to thriving. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5.

PubMed Central. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2026). Trauma and violence: What is trauma and its effects? SAMHSA.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2023). Practical guide for implementing a trauma-informed approach. SAMHSA.

Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene, I., Brailovskaia, J., Kamite, Y., Petrauskaite, G., Margraf, J., & Kazlauskas, E. (2020). Does trauma shape identity? Exploring the links between lifetime trauma exposure and identity status in emerging adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 570644.

PubMed Central. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. (2026). Avoidance. National Center for PTSD. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, South Central MIRECC. (2022). An active approach to recovering from trauma: Breaking the cycle of safety aids and avoidance. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

🌟 Happy National Case Management Week! 🌟

This week, we proudly recognize and celebrate the incredible Case Managers who work tirelessly to make a difference in the lives of those they serve every day.

Case Managers are often the bridge between hope and healing, helping individuals and families navigate complex systems, access critical resources, overcome barriers, and achieve their goals. Their compassion, dedication, advocacy, and commitment to person-centered care create lasting positive impacts in our communities.

At Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, we are grateful for the Case Managers who go above and beyond to support individuals through some of life’s most challenging moments. Your ability to listen, empower, encourage, and advocate changes lives in ways that often go unseen, but never go unappreciated.

Thank you for your unwavering dedication, your servant hearts, and your commitment to improving the health and well-being of others. The work you do matters, and the people you serve are better because of it.

💙 This week, we celebrate you. 💙 We appreciate you. 💙 We thank you for making a difference every single day.

Happy National Case Management Week!


Standing Between Childhood and Adulthood: Understanding One of Life’s Most Important Life Stages

There comes a time in life when a young person is no longer a child but not yet an adult. It is a season filled with change, growth, questions, and self-discovery. This stage, known as adolescence, is one of the most important periods of human development.

During this time, young people begin to ask questions that will help shape the rest of their lives:

  • Who am I?
  • Where do I belong?
  • What do I believe?
  • What kind of person do I want to become?

Psychologists and developmental researchers have spent decades studying this stage of life. Although they approach it from different perspectives, most agree that adolescence is a critical period for developing identity, values, relationships, and independence.

A Bridge Between Two Worlds

Adolescence can be compared to standing on a bridge.

On one side is childhood, where parents make most decisions and provide protection and guidance. On the other side is adulthood, where people are expected to take responsibility for their choices and actions.

Young people spend years crossing that bridge.

As they do, they experience major changes in their bodies, emotions, relationships, and thinking. These changes can feel exciting one moment and overwhelming the next. Many adolescents want more freedom while still needing support and guidance from trusted adults.

This tension is normal. In fact, it is part of healthy development.

Erikson: The Search for Identity

Psychologist Erik Erikson believed the most important task during adolescence is developing a clear sense of identity. He called this stage Identity vs. Role Confusion. According to Erikson, young people begin exploring who they are and who they want to become. They may try new activities, develop different interests, form new friendships, or question beliefs they have always accepted.

This process is not rebellion for the sake of rebellion. It is often a search for identity.

When adolescents successfully develop a sense of who they are, they gain confidence and direction. When they struggle to find that identity, they may experience confusion about their place in the world.

Piaget: Learning to Think in New Ways

Developmental psychologist Jean Piaget focused on how thinking changes throughout life.

According to Piaget, adolescence marks the beginning of the Formal Operational Stage, where individuals become capable of abstract thought. This means they begin thinking about ideas rather than just facts. They can consider:

  • Justice and fairness
  • Morality
  • Politics
  • Faith and spirituality
  • Future careers
  • Life goals

A child may ask, “What happened?”

An adolescent is more likely to ask, “Why did it happen?” or “What should have happened instead?”

This new ability to think deeply helps adolescents understand the world, but it can also create stress as they become more aware of life’s challenges and uncertainties.

Kohlberg: Developing a Moral Compass

Psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg studied how people develop moral reasoning.

As children grow into adolescence, they often begin moving beyond simple ideas of right and wrong based on rewards and punishments. Instead, they begin considering values, fairness, and ethical principles.

For example, rather than asking, “Will I get in trouble?” an adolescent may ask:

  • Is this fair?
  • Is this the right thing to do?
  • How will this affect others?

This growing moral awareness helps young people form personal values that can guide them throughout adulthood.

Marcia: Exploring Different Identities

Psychologist James Marcia expanded on Erikson’s work by studying how people develop identity.

Marcia found that adolescents often move through different stages of exploration before settling on a stable identity.

Some follow beliefs and goals chosen by others. Some explore many possibilities before making decisions. Others struggle to decide who they want to be.

These periods of exploration are often necessary because identity is not something that appears overnight. It develops through experience, reflection, and personal growth.

Bronfenbrenner: The Power of Environment

Psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner believed development cannot be understood without looking at the environment around a person.

According to his ecological systems theory, adolescents are influenced by many different systems, including:

  • Family
  • Friends
  • School
  • Community
  • Culture
  • Society

Each of these environments shapes development in important ways.

A supportive family can provide stability during difficult times. Positive friendships can strengthen confidence and self-esteem. Good schools and mentors can help adolescents discover talents and future goals.

Bronfenbrenner’s theory reminds us that young people do not grow alone. They grow within relationships and communities.

Attachment Theory: The Need for Secure Relationships

Psychologists John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth developed Attachment Theory, which emphasizes the importance of secure relationships.

Many people assume adolescents stop needing their parents as they get older. In reality, research shows that strong, supportive relationships continue to play a vital role in healthy development.

Even when adolescents seek independence, they still benefit from trusted adults who provide:

  • Encouragement
  • Stability
  • Guidance
  • Emotional support

Healthy attachment helps young people develop confidence, resilience, and healthy relationships later in life.

The Adolescent Brain

Modern neuroscience has added another important piece to our understanding of adolescence.

Research shows that the brain continues developing well beyond the teenage years. The areas of the brain responsible for judgment, planning, and impulse control mature more slowly than areas responsible for emotions and rewards.

This helps explain why adolescents can sometimes make decisions that seem irrational to adults.

It is not because they lack intelligence.

It is because their brains are still developing.

Understanding this can help parents, teachers, and mentors respond with patience rather than frustration.

Preparing for Adulthood

Developmental psychologist Jeffrey Arnett proposed that the process of becoming an adult often continues into the twenties. He called this stage Emerging Adulthood.

According to Arnett, many young people continue exploring:

  • Careers
  • Education
  • Relationships
  • Personal values
  • Life goals

The identity questions that begin during adolescence often continue well into early adulthood as individuals work toward becoming the people they hope to be.

More Than Growing Older

All of these developmental theories point to the same conclusion:

Adolescence is far more than a stage of physical growth.

It is a time when identity is formed, values are developed, beliefs are tested, and character begins to take shape.

Young people are learning how to think for themselves, make decisions, build relationships, and understand their place in the world.

They are not simply getting older.

They are becoming the adults they will one day be.

For parents, teachers, mentors, and communities, this stage provides a unique opportunity to offer guidance, encouragement, and positive examples. The lessons learned during these years often remain with people for the rest of their lives.

The bridge between childhood and adulthood can sometimes feel uncertain, but it is also filled with possibility. Every question explored, every challenge faced, and every lesson learned helps build the foundation for the future.


About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor, behavioral health executive, writer, and advocate for individuals, families, and communities facing life’s challenges. He serves as the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC, where he oversees behavioral health, substance use, developmental disability, and community support services throughout Kentucky.

John began his career in human services with a bachelor’s degree while serving in multiple roles within Kentucky’s public and community-based systems. In 2004, he became a Certified Social Worker and continued expanding his clinical expertise, eventually earning his Licensed Clinical Social Worker credential and Supervisor designation. Throughout more than two decades of service, he has worked with children, adolescents, adults, and families affected by trauma, mental illness, addiction, disability, grief, poverty, and systemic barriers to care.

His professional experience includes outpatient behavioral health, case management, crisis intervention, child welfare, developmental disabilities, substance use treatment, and organizational leadership. These experiences have provided him with a unique perspective on human growth and development across the lifespan.

As a clinician and leader, John has developed a special interest in understanding how people grow, adapt, and overcome adversity. Much of his writing explores the intersection of psychology, personal growth, faith, character development, relationships, and resilience. Through both clinical practice and leadership, he has witnessed how childhood experiences, family relationships, community influences, and life transitions shape the adults people eventually become.

John is also the author of The Mind’s Trestle Board, a collection of articles and reflections that examine life’s challenges through the lenses of psychology, personal experience, and timeless principles of growth and wisdom. His writing seeks to make complex psychological concepts understandable and relevant to everyday life while encouraging readers to pursue self-awareness, purpose, and healthy relationships.

When writing about adolescence and human development, John draws upon both established developmental theories and his extensive experience working with young people and families. He believes that understanding the challenges of each life stage helps individuals, parents, educators, and communities better support one another during times of change and growth.

Through his clinical work, leadership, and writing, John remains committed to helping others build stronger foundations for mental health, meaningful relationships, and personal fulfillment.

References

American Psychological Association. Identity versus identity confusion. APA Dictionary of Psychology.

American Psychological Association. Erikson’s Eight Stages of Psychosocial Development. APA Dictionary of Psychology.

Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties.

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis.

Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development.

Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551-558.

Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child.

Ragelienė, T. (2016). Links of adolescents’ identity development and relationship with peers: A systematic literature review. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(2), 97-105.

Core Competency #9, Developmental Perspectives Across the Life Span.

“The journey from childhood to adulthood is not merely a passage of time. It is the formation of identity, character, values, and purpose. The adults we become are often shaped by the questions we ask, the challenges we face, and the guidance we receive during these formative years.” – John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S