Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Category Communication

What Is True Narcissism? Understanding a Term That Society Uses Too Freely

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

Few psychological terms have become as overused in modern society as the word narcissist. Spend a few minutes scrolling through social media, and you are likely to encounter countless videos, articles, and self-proclaimed experts explaining how to identify the narcissists in your life. An ex-spouse is labeled a narcissist. A demanding boss is called a narcissist. A parent who disappointed their child is suddenly a narcissist. Even someone who posts too many selfies may find themselves carrying the label.

The question that deserves attention is simple: What is true narcissism? More importantly, why are we so quick to apply the label to people whose behavior we dislike, misunderstand, or disagree with?

The answer is more complex than most people realize.

The Difference Between Narcissistic Traits and Narcissistic Personality Disorder

The first thing we must understand is that narcissism exists on a spectrum. Most people possess at least some narcissistic traits. Healthy self-esteem involves recognizing our strengths, taking pride in our accomplishments, and believing that we are worthy of love and respect. In fact, without a certain degree of self-focus, people would struggle to advocate for themselves, pursue goals, or maintain personal boundaries.

Having confidence does not make someone a narcissist.

Wanting recognition for hard work does not make someone a narcissist.

Feeling hurt when criticized does not make someone a narcissist.

True narcissism becomes problematic when an individual’s need for admiration, validation, and control consistently outweighs their ability to empathize with others. Narcissistic traits become a disorder only when they are rigid, deeply ingrained, and cause significant impairment in relationships, work, and daily functioning.

Many people demonstrate narcissistic behaviors occasionally. Very few meet the clinical criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).

What Is Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a recognized mental health condition described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Individuals with NPD typically exhibit a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, a strong need for admiration, and a lack of empathy that begins in early adulthood and is present across many areas of life.

Some common characteristics include:

An exaggerated sense of self-importance

Fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, or beauty

A belief that they are special or unique

A need for excessive admiration

A sense of entitlement

Exploitative behavior toward others

Difficulty recognizing or caring about others’ feelings

Envy of others or belief that others envy them

Arrogant or haughty attitudes and behaviors

What is important to understand is that these characteristics are not occasional. They are persistent patterns that influence nearly every significant relationship and interaction.

A person may act selfishly during a stressful period. Another person may struggle to apologize when they feel threatened. Those behaviors alone do not indicate a personality disorder.

Why We Are Labeling Everyone a Narcissist

Human beings naturally search for explanations when relationships become painful. When someone hurts us, disappoints us, or behaves in a way we cannot understand, assigning a label can provide a sense of closure.

The term narcissist often becomes a convenient explanation for complex human behavior.

Instead of saying:

“My partner struggles with accountability.”

“My coworker has poor interpersonal skills.”

“My parent was emotionally unavailable.”

“My friend tends to make everything about themselves.”

We simply say:

“They’re a narcissist.”

The label offers certainty. Unfortunately, certainty is not always accuracy.

The reality is that people can be selfish without being narcissistic. They can be immature without having a personality disorder. They can make harmful decisions without being clinically narcissistic.

Sometimes people act from fear, insecurity, trauma, poor emotional intelligence, or unresolved pain. These explanations may not excuse harmful behavior, but they often provide a more accurate understanding of what is occurring.

The Hidden Insecurity Behind Narcissism

One of the greatest misconceptions about narcissism is that narcissists have extremely high self-esteem. In reality, many individuals with significant narcissistic traits possess surprisingly fragile self-esteem beneath the surface.

The confidence they display is often more like armor than genuine self-worth.

Because their self-image is so vulnerable, they become highly sensitive to criticism, rejection, or perceived disrespect. They may respond with anger, defensiveness, blame, or attempts to regain control.

The grandiosity frequently seen in narcissism is not always evidence of strength. Sometimes it represents an effort to protect deep feelings of inadequacy.

This does not excuse harmful behavior. However, it helps us understand that narcissism is often rooted in emotional wounds rather than genuine superiority.

The Danger of Misusing Mental Health Labels

As mental health awareness has increased, so has the misuse of mental health terminology.

People now casually use terms such as:

Narcissist

Bipolar

OCD

Trauma

Gaslighting

Triggered

While increased awareness can be positive, there is also a danger in reducing complex conditions to everyday insults or buzzwords.

When we inaccurately label others, several problems emerge:

First, we may overlook the true causes of their behavior.

Second, we can contribute to stigma surrounding legitimate mental health conditions.

Third, we may avoid examining our own role in difficult relationships.

Sometimes the healthiest question is not, “Is this person a narcissist?” but rather, “Is this relationship healthy for me?”

The answer to the second question is often far more useful.

Moving Toward Understanding Instead of Labeling

The desire to understand human behavior is natural. However, understanding requires curiosity rather than assumptions.

Instead of immediately diagnosing people from a distance, we might ask:

What motivates this behavior?

What insecurities could be influencing this person?

Is this an ongoing pattern or an isolated incident?

How does this relationship affect my well-being?

What boundaries do I need to establish?

These questions encourage reflection rather than judgment.

The goal should never be to excuse harmful behavior. Rather, it should be to understand it accurately.

Final Thoughts

True narcissism is much more than selfishness, arrogance, confidence, or a difficult personality. It is a complex pattern of thinking, feeling, and relating to others that extends far beyond the occasional flaws that all human beings possess.

In a world increasingly focused on labels, perhaps we should spend less time trying to diagnose the people around us and more time seeking to understand them.

Not everyone who hurts us is a narcissist.

Not everyone who disagrees with us is toxic.

Not everyone who struggles with empathy has a personality disorder.

Sometimes people are simply imperfect human beings doing the best they can with the emotional tools they have developed throughout their lives.

The challenge for all of us is learning the difference.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor, behavioral health executive, and advocate for mental health awareness and community well-being. As the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC, he has dedicated his career to helping individuals, families, and communities navigate life’s challenges through evidence-based mental health services, compassionate care, and practical solutions.

With extensive experience in clinical social work, behavioral health administration, crisis intervention, community mental health, and leadership development, Mr. Collier brings a unique perspective that bridges both clinical knowledge and real-world application. His work has focused on empowering individuals to improve their emotional health, strengthen relationships, develop resilience, and achieve meaningful personal growth.

In addition to his clinical and administrative roles, Mr. Collier is passionate about educating the public on mental health topics, reducing stigma, and helping people better understand the complexities of human behavior. Through his writing, he seeks to translate psychological concepts into practical, accessible information that readers can apply in their everyday lives.

His articles explore a wide range of subjects, including mental health, human behavior, grief and loss, relationships, emotional wellness, resilience, trauma, personal development, and the impact of social and cultural trends on psychological well-being.

Mr. Collier believes that greater understanding leads to greater compassion and that meaningful change begins when individuals are willing to look beyond labels, assumptions, and judgment to better understand themselves and others.

“The goal is not simply to explain behavior, but to promote understanding, encourage growth, and inspire healthier relationships with ourselves and those around us.”
– John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 638-656.

Miller, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2007). Narcissistic personality disorder: Relations with distress and functional impairment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48(2), 170-177.

Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421-446.

Emotional safety: The Foundation of Lasting Love and Trust

Every healthy relationship is built upon a foundation that is often overlooked but profoundly essential: emotional safety. While attraction, shared interests, and physical intimacy contribute to relationship satisfaction, they cannot sustain a relationship in the absence of emotional security. Emotional safety is the confidence that one can be authentic, vulnerable, and emotionally honest without fear of ridicule, rejection, manipulation, or abandonment. It allows individuals to express their thoughts, emotions, fears, and hopes knowing they will be met with respect, empathy, and understanding.

Psychological research consistently demonstrates that emotional safety is one of the strongest predictors of relationship satisfaction, resilience, and long-term stability (Gottman & Silver, 2015; Johnson, 2019). Couples who cultivate emotional safety are better equipped to navigate disagreements, recover from conflict, and deepen intimacy over time.

Defining Emotional Safety

Emotional safety refers to a relational environment in which both partners feel accepted, valued, respected, and emotionally secure. It is characterized by trust, mutual respect, consistent behavior, and the confidence that one’s emotional needs will be met with compassion rather than criticism.

Dr. Sue Johnson (2019), founder of Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), describes emotional safety as the assurance that one’s partner is emotionally accessible, responsive, and engaged. When individuals experience this type of security, they are more likely to communicate openly, develop secure attachment patterns, and experience greater emotional well-being.

Unlike physical safety, emotional safety involves protecting another person’s dignity, self-worth, and emotional experiences.

Characteristics of Emotionally Safe Relationships

Emotionally safe relationships exhibit several defining characteristics.

Open Communication

Partners freely express thoughts, feelings, concerns, and desires without fearing ridicule or punishment. Honest communication becomes an invitation to understand rather than an opportunity to criticize.

Mutual Respect

Each individual values the other’s opinions, boundaries, and individuality, even during disagreement. Respect communicates that one’s worth is not dependent upon agreement.

Emotional Validation

Validation does not necessarily mean agreement. Instead, it acknowledges another person’s emotional experience as real and understandable. For example:

“I understand why you felt hurt by what happened.”

This differs significantly from statements such as:

“You’re too sensitive.”

Research indicates that emotional validation reduces defensiveness and promotes healthier conflict resolution (Linehan, 2015).

Consistency

Trust develops when behaviors consistently align with words. Predictability creates emotional stability and reduces anxiety within the relationship.

Healthy Conflict Resolution

Emotionally safe couples recognize that disagreements are inevitable. Rather than attacking each other, they focus on solving problems together.

According to Gottman and Silver (2015), successful couples maintain a ratio of approximately five positive interactions for every negative interaction during times of conflict, helping preserve emotional connection despite disagreement.

The Role of Vulnerability

One of the greatest indicators of emotional safety is the willingness to be vulnerable.

Vulnerability includes:

  • Admitting mistakes
  • Expressing fears
  • Asking for support
  • Sharing dreams
  • Revealing insecurities
  • Discussing painful experiences

Brown (2012) argues that vulnerability is not weakness but the birthplace of courage, intimacy, and authentic connection. Emotional safety provides the environment where vulnerability becomes possible.

Without safety, vulnerability feels dangerous.

With safety, vulnerability strengthens emotional intimacy.

Emotional Safety and Attachment Theory

Attachment theory provides significant insight into why emotional safety is so important.

Originally developed by John Bowlby (1988) and later expanded by Mary Ainsworth and others, attachment theory proposes that early relationships shape expectations regarding trust and security.

Individuals with secure attachment generally experience:

  • Greater trust
  • Better emotional regulation
  • Healthier communication
  • Higher relationship satisfaction

Conversely, individuals with anxious or avoidant attachment styles often struggle with emotional safety due to previous experiences involving inconsistency, rejection, or emotional neglect.

Fortunately, emotionally safe adult relationships can help reshape insecure attachment patterns through repeated experiences of trust, reliability, and compassion (Johnson, 2019).

Behaviors That Create Emotional Safety

Partners cultivate emotional safety through intentional daily behaviors.

These include:

  • Listening without interrupting
  • Demonstrating empathy
  • Keeping promises
  • Respecting confidentiality
  • Avoiding contempt and sarcasm
  • Offering reassurance during stressful situations
  • Apologizing sincerely when wrong
  • Speaking respectfully during conflict
  • Expressing appreciation regularly
  • Supporting one another’s emotional growth

Small, consistent acts often have a greater cumulative impact than occasional grand gestures.

Behaviors That Undermine Emotional Safety

Several behaviors quickly erode trust and emotional security.

These include:

  • Criticism
  • Contempt
  • Defensiveness
  • Stonewalling
  • Gaslighting
  • Manipulation
  • Silent treatment
  • Public humiliation
  • Emotional invalidation
  • Chronic dishonesty

Gottman (1999) famously identified criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling as the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” noting that these behaviors strongly predict relationship dissatisfaction and divorce.

Emotional Safety During Conflict

Contrary to popular belief, emotionally safe couples still experience disagreements.

The difference lies not in the frequency of conflict but in how conflict is managed.

Healthy couples:

  • Stay focused on the issue rather than attacking character.
  • Listen before responding.
  • Take responsibility for mistakes.
  • Seek understanding rather than victory.
  • Repair emotional injuries quickly.

Conflict becomes an opportunity for greater understanding rather than emotional destruction.

The Psychological Benefits of Emotional Safety

Research demonstrates numerous psychological benefits associated with emotionally safe relationships.

These include:

  • Reduced anxiety
  • Lower depression rates
  • Increased resilience
  • Improved emotional regulation
  • Greater life satisfaction
  • Better physical health
  • Enhanced self-esteem
  • Increased relationship commitment

Coan and Sbarra (2015) explain that supportive relationships reduce physiological stress responses, illustrating that emotional safety benefits both psychological and physical health.

Developing Emotional Safety

Building emotional safety requires intentional effort from both partners.

Practical strategies include:

  1. Practice active listening.
  2. Validate emotions before offering solutions.
  3. Keep commitments.
  4. Express appreciation daily.
  5. Establish healthy boundaries.
  6. Repair conflicts promptly.
  7. Avoid personal attacks.
  8. Show consistent affection.
  9. Encourage emotional honesty.
  10. Seek professional counseling when necessary.

Developing emotional safety is not about achieving perfection but about consistently choosing empathy over judgment and connection over defensiveness.

Conclusion

Emotional safety is the invisible foundation upon which healthy relationships are built. It allows individuals to become their authentic selves without fear of rejection or humiliation. When emotional safety exists, vulnerability becomes strength, communication becomes honest, conflict becomes constructive, and intimacy deepens naturally.

Ultimately, emotional safety answers one of humanity’s deepest relational questions:

“Can I fully be myself with you and know that I will still be loved?”

When the answer is yes, relationships flourish.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a licensed clinical social worker, behavioral health professional, and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health, he has dedicated his career to helping individuals and families navigate trauma, grief, anxiety, depression, relationship challenges, life transitions, and emotional healing. His clinical work combines evidence-based therapeutic approaches with genuine compassion, empowering people to build resilience, strengthen relationships, and discover hope during life’s most difficult seasons.

In addition to his clinical practice, John is a prolific author whose writings bridge psychological science, practical life skills, and Christian principles. His work is known for translating complex mental health concepts into clear, compassionate, and practical guidance that readers can immediately apply to everyday life. Whether writing about emotional wellness, relationships, trauma recovery, personal growth, or spiritual development, he seeks to equip readers with tools that promote lasting change and healthier living.

John is also a respected writer on Freemasonry, symbolism, leadership, and personal development, blending historical scholarship with thoughtful reflection and practical application. Across every book and article, his goal remains the same: to encourage insight, inspire hope, and provide readers with practical wisdom that fosters emotional, relational, and spiritual well-being.

He lives in London, Kentucky, where he continues to serve his community through counseling, education, writing, and professional leadership. His passion is helping people move beyond survival toward lives marked by resilience, purpose, healthy relationships, and lasting hope.

References

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly. Gotham Books.

Coan, J. A., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Social baseline theory: The social regulation of risk and effort. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 87–91.

Gottman, J. M. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Crown Publishers.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (Revised ed.). Harmony Books.

Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment Theory in Practice: Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) with Individuals, Couples, and Families. Guilford Press.

Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT Skills Training Manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

If you’d like, I can also expand this into a 20–25 page journal-style article with sections on emotional safety in marriage, dating, trauma, attachment styles, neuroscience, red flags, practical exercises, and Christian/Biblical perspectives.

Grieving the Future You Thought You Would Have

Why Losing a Dream Can Hurt as Much as Losing a Person

Imagine This…

Imagine walking into an empty house.

The walls are bare. The rooms are quiet. There are no family pictures. No laughter. No smell of dinner cooking.

But in your mind, the house is full.

You see birthday parties in the living room. Christmas mornings around the tree. Quiet evenings sitting together on the porch. You picture growing old with the person you love.

Then one conversation changes everything. The future you imagined is suddenly gone. Now you are not only grieving the person you loved. You are grieving the life you thought you were going to have. That kind of pain is real.

Why Does This Hurt So Much?

When we fall in love, our minds naturally begin thinking about tomorrow. We imagine holidays together. We talk about places we want to visit. We dream about growing old side by side. We picture birthdays, anniversaries, and family traditions.

Our brain starts treating those dreams like they are already part of our life. When the relationship ends, we lose more than the person. We also lose the future we believed was coming. That is why heartbreak often feels much bigger than people expect.

Your Brain Is Trying to Make Sense of It

Our brains like certainty. They want to know what tomorrow will look like. When we feel safe with someone, our brain begins filling in the blanks. It says things like:

“We’ll always be together.”

“We’ll get married someday.”

“We’ll grow old together.”

Those thoughts feel real because we repeat them over and over. When the relationship ends, our brain suddenly has to erase a future it had already accepted. That takes time.

The Difference Between Reality and the Story We Tell Ourselves

There is an important difference between facts and assumptions. A fact is something that really happened. An assumption is something we believed would happen.

For example:

Fact: You loved someone.

Fact: You spent time planning a future together.

Assumption: Everything would work out exactly as you imagined. Many people spend months grieving the assumptions more than the facts. That does not make them weak. It makes them human.

We Sometimes Fall in Love with Tomorrow

Most people do not realize they are doing it. We begin to love birthdays that have never happened. We miss vacations we never took. We grieve children that were never born. We cry over conversations that never happened.

We mourn a retirement beside someone who may never have been there. Those dreams mattered because they gave us hope. Hope is powerful. When hope is broken, our hearts feel broken too.

Be Careful Not to Rewrite the Past

When we are hurting, we often remember only the good moments. We forget the disagreements. We forget the red flags. We forget the hard conversations. Our mind tries to protect us by showing us only the happiest memories. That is normal. But healing requires us to remember the whole story—not just the parts we wish had lasted forever.

A Simple Exercise

Take out a piece of paper. Draw a line down the middle. On one side write Facts. On the other side write Assumptions.

For example:

Facts

Assumptions

We loved each other.

We would grow old together.

We talked about marriage.

We were guaranteed to marry.

We planned a future.

That future was certain.

The relationship ended.

I will never be happy again.

When you finish, read only the facts.

You may notice that many of the thoughts causing the deepest pain are assumptions, not reality.

That does not make your pain less real.

It simply helps your mind separate what happened from what you feared losing.

Healing Takes Time

You cannot force your heart to stop hurting. You cannot flip a switch and move on. Healing happens one day at a time. Some mornings you will feel strong. Other mornings you may feel like you are starting over. That is okay. Healing is not a straight line. It is a journey. Keep taking the next step.

Eventually, the future you thought you lost will slowly make room for a new future you never expected.

Final Thoughts

One of the hardest parts of heartbreak is realizing that you are not only grieving a person. You are grieving birthdays that never happened. Anniversaries that were never celebrated. Dreams that never became memories. But remember this.

Just because one future ended does not mean your story is over. God is still writing the chapters you have not read yet. And sometimes the pages you never expected become the most beautiful part of the story.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S, is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health, he has worked with individuals and families facing grief, trauma, anxiety, depression, relationship struggles, and life transitions. His writing combines clinical research with everyday language to help people better understand their emotions, develop healthy coping skills, and find hope during life’s most difficult seasons.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

Beck, J. S. (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. Basic Books.

Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Techniques of grief therapy: Assessment and intervention. Routledge.

Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Boerner, K. (2017). Cautioning health-care professionals: Bereaved persons are misguided through the stages of grief. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 74(4), 455–473.

When Your Spouse Wants a Divorce—and You Are Finally Trying

Understanding Fear, Regret, Urgency, Change, and the Difficult Work of Rebuilding Trust

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW

When a spouse says they want a divorce, the words may feel like the sudden collapse of a life you believed would continue. You may feel shocked. You may feel confused. You may wonder how the marriage reached this point. You may believe the decision came without warning—even though your spouse may feel they have been expressing their pain, disappointment, loneliness, or unmet needs for years.

Suddenly, everything becomes urgent. You begin listening more carefully. You become more affectionate. You help more around the home. You spend more time with your spouse and family. You communicate more openly. You schedule counseling. You apologize. You begin doing many of the things your spouse had asked you to do before.

You may sincerely believe:

  • “I finally understand.”
  • “I know what I did wrong.”
  • “I can change.”
  • “I will never take this marriage for granted again.”
  • “Please give me one more chance.”

Your effort may be genuine.

Your regret may be real. Your love may be sincere. Yet your spouse may remain uncertain. They may appear emotionally distant. They may question your motives. They may say:

  • “You have done this before.”
  • Or:
  • “You only change when I am ready to leave.”

Those words may feel unfair because you know how deeply you are hurting and how hard you are trying. However, understanding your spouse’s hesitation may require recognizing an important difference:

You are experiencing the urgency of possibly losing the marriage today. Your spouse may be carrying the accumulated pain of feeling alone within the marriage for years.

Both experiences matter.

“Why Didn’t I Understand Before?”

One of the most painful questions may be:

“Why did it take the possibility of divorce for me to understand what my spouse needed?” Perhaps your spouse communicated their concerns many times.

Maybe they said:

  • “I feel alone.”
  • “I need more help.”
  • “I do not feel important to you.”
  • “I need you to listen.”
  • “I want us to spend time together.”
  • “I do not feel appreciated.”
  • “I feel like we are roommates.”
  • “I cannot keep living like this.”

At the time, you may have heard criticism rather than pain. You may have felt attacked. You may have become defensive. You may have explained why you were tired, stressed, busy, overwhelmed, or doing the best you could. You may have believed that providing financially, working hard, completing responsibilities, remaining faithful, caring for the children, or simply staying in the marriage demonstrated love. You may have thought:

  • “I am here. What more do they want from me?”
  • Meanwhile, your spouse may have been thinking:
  • “You are physically here, but I still feel emotionally alone.”

Neither perspective automatically means that one person cared and the other did not. Sometimes partners express and recognize love differently. Sometimes one spouse believes they are contributing greatly while the other experiences unmet emotional or relational needs. However, when concerns are repeatedly minimized, avoided, dismissed, or postponed, emotional distance may gradually develop.

Why Divorce Can Suddenly Make Everything Clear

The possibility of divorce creates consequences that are difficult to ignore. Before divorce was mentioned, relationship concerns may have felt uncomfortable but manageable. You may have believed:

  • “We are going through a difficult season.”
  • “All couples have problems.”
  • “Things will eventually get better.”
  • “My spouse is upset, but they are not actually going anywhere.”

Then your spouse says:

“I want a divorce.”

Suddenly, the concerns no longer feel temporary. You begin imagining an empty home. You think about waking up without your spouse. You imagine holidays changing. You worry about the children. You think about finances, living arrangements, family traditions, companionship, shared memories, and the future you expected to have. You may recognize the value of ordinary moments only when you realize they may no longer be part of your life. Fear can create clarity. Loss can reveal value. Consequences can create urgency. That does not necessarily mean your effort is false. However, your spouse may wonder why the possibility of losing them created more urgency than their pain did.

“But I Really Am Trying This Time”

You may feel frustrated when your effort is questioned. You may think:

  • “Why can’t they see that I am different?”
  • “Why does everything I did wrong matter more than everything I am doing now?”
  • “How long am I supposed to pay for the past?”
  • “Why ask me to change if they will not believe me when I do?”

These are understandable questions. You may genuinely be changing. People can gain insight. People can recognize harmful patterns. People can learn healthier communication. People can become more emotionally available. People can change priorities. People can rebuild relationships. However, your spouse may not be rejecting your current effort. They may be protecting themselves from another disappointment.

If this pattern has happened before, they may remember previous apologies, promises, counseling appointments, affectionate periods, increased involvement, or temporary improvements. They may remember feeling hopeful. They may also remember what happened after the crisis passed.

Your spouse may not be asking: “Are you trying today?” They may be asking: “Will you still be trying after you feel certain that I am staying?”

The Difference Between Sincere Effort and Sustainable Change

Your effort can be sincere and still be temporary. This does not mean you are intentionally deceiving anyone. During a crisis, fear, grief, regret, and urgency can create powerful motivation. You may sincerely promise: “I will never do that again.” You may fully believe it. However, lasting change requires more than sincerity. It requires new habits. It requires accountability. It requires emotional awareness. It requires consistency. It may require individual counseling, couples counseling, education, support, honest self-reflection, and a willingness to examine behaviors that are uncomfortable to acknowledge.

Sustainable change continues after the immediate fear decreases. It continues when your spouse is no longer praising your effort. It continues when reconciliation remains uncertain. It continues when you are tired. It continues when life becomes stressful. It continues when changing is inconvenient. It continues when no one is watching. Lasting change is not demonstrated only by what you do while trying to prevent your spouse from leaving. It is demonstrated by who you become after the crisis is no longer controlling your behavior.

Understanding Why Your Spouse May Not Trust the Change

Trust is not rebuilt at the same speed that behavior can change. You may change your actions today. Your spouse may need months—or longer—to determine whether those actions represent a new pattern. You may think: “I have done everything they asked for during the last three weeks.” Your spouse may think: “I experienced the old pattern for many years.” Three good weeks do not automatically erase years of hurt.

This does not mean your current effort has no value. It means trust often requires repeated experiences over time. If your spouse has repeatedly hoped, trusted, reconciled, and later experienced the same disappointment, they may become cautious about hope itself. Hope may feel dangerous because hope requires emotional vulnerability. They may fear: “If I believe again, and everything returns to the way it was, I do not know whether I can survive another disappointment.” Their hesitation may not be punishment. It may be self-protection.

Your Intentions and Their Experience May Be Different

You may say: “I never intended to hurt you.” That may be true. You may not have intended for your spouse to feel neglected, ignored, unsupported, unwanted, unappreciated, or alone. However, intention and impact are not always the same. You may have intended to provide. Your spouse may have experienced emotional absence. You may have intended to avoid conflict. Your spouse may have experienced avoidance or abandonment. You may have intended to give your spouse space. Your spouse may have experienced disconnection. You may have intended to explain yourself. Your spouse may have experienced defensiveness. You may have intended to solve the problem. Your spouse may have needed empathy and understanding.

Recognizing the impact of your behavior does not require believing that you were intentionally cruel. Accountability is not the same as declaring yourself a bad person. Accountability means becoming willing to understand experiences beyond your intentions.

Avoid Making Your Spouse Responsible for Your Fear

When divorce becomes possible, you may experience panic, sadness, anxiety, anger, shame, grief, loneliness, or desperation. You may cry. You may struggle to sleep. You may repeatedly ask for reassurance. You may say:

  • “Tell me there is still hope.”
  • “Promise me you will not leave.”
  • “Tell me what I need to do.”
  • “How can you do this to our family?”
  • “What about everything we built?”

Your pain deserves compassion. However, your spouse may already be emotionally exhausted. If they have spent years asking for change, they may not have the emotional capacity to comfort you about the consequences of the problems they were trying to address. Be careful not to make your spouse responsible for relieving your fear. Seek appropriate support. Talk with a therapist. Use healthy family or social supports without recruiting people to pressure your spouse. Reflect. Journal. Pray, if faith is meaningful to you. Learn to tolerate uncertainty without demanding immediate reassurance.

Your spouse may need space to understand what they feel. Respecting that space may be one of the first ways you demonstrate meaningful change.

Do Not Use Guilt as a Reason They Should Stay

Fear may cause people to say things they later regret. You may be tempted to say:

  • “You are destroying our family.”
  • “You are throwing away all these years.”
  • “What will this do to the children?”
  • “You are not giving me a chance.”
  • “You are being selfish.”
  • “You will regret this.”
  • “No one will ever love you like I do.”

These statements may come from pain, but they can place responsibility for the entire relationship on the spouse considering divorce. The decision to divorce may be theirs. The history leading to that decision belongs to the relationship. Rather than asking: “How can you leave when I am trying?” Consider asking: “What happened between us that made leaving feel safer, healthier, or more hopeful than staying?”

The answer may be painful. Listening without immediately defending yourself may provide information that years of arguing could not.

Apologies Should Not Demand Immediate Forgiveness

A meaningful apology is not a transaction.

It does not say: “I apologized, so you should stay.” It does not say: “I admitted I was wrong, so you should trust me.” It does not say: “I changed, so you owe me another chance.” A healthier apology may sound like:

“I understand that my choices affected you. I am sorry. I recognize that my intentions do not erase your experience. I want to change because I need to become healthier—not only because I am afraid of losing you. I hope trust can be rebuilt, but I understand that I cannot demand it.”

An apology takes responsibility. It does not control the outcome.

Change Should Not Depend Entirely on Reconciliation

You may ask: “Why should I continue trying if my spouse may leave anyway?” Because the changes may still matter. Learning to communicate more effectively matters. Becoming emotionally available matters. Developing accountability matters. Understanding your relationship patterns matters. Becoming a healthier parent matters. Learning to listen matters. Addressing anger, avoidance, defensiveness, substance use, emotional withdrawal, dishonesty, unhealthy boundaries, work imbalance, or other concerns matters. Personal growth should not be used only as a bargaining tool to obtain reconciliation.

If your change depends entirely on your spouse promising to stay, then the change remains dependent on the crisis. Consider saying: “I hope we can rebuild our marriage. But whether we reconcile or not, I need to understand my role, address these patterns, and become healthier.”

That is not giving up on the marriage. It is taking responsibility for the part of change that belongs to you.

Questions to Ask Yourself

Rather than asking only, “How do I convince my spouse to stay?” consider asking:

  1. What concerns did my spouse repeatedly communicate?
  2. How did I usually respond?
  3. Did I listen—or immediately explain, defend, minimize, blame, withdraw, or attempt to end the conversation?
  4. Did I mistake the absence of arguments for relationship satisfaction?
  5. Did my spouse become quieter because things improved—or because they stopped believing change was possible?
  6. Have I made similar promises during previous relationship crises?
  7. What happened after those crises passed?
  8. Am I changing because I understand the harm—or primarily because I fear the consequences?
  9. Am I seeking counseling because I want growth—or because I believe attendance should persuade my spouse to stay?
  10. Can I respect my spouse’s boundaries even when those boundaries increase my fear?
  11. Can I listen to their experience without correcting their memory or debating their feelings?
  12. Am I willing to continue changing without receiving immediate forgiveness, trust, affection, or reassurance?
  13. What specific behaviors need to change?
  14. What support, education, counseling, or accountability will help make those changes sustainable?
  15. Who do I want to become regardless of the outcome of the marriage?

What Lasting Change May Look Like

Lasting change may include:

  • Listening without immediately becoming defensive
  • Accepting responsibility without adding “but”
  • Acknowledging impact rather than focusing only on intent
  • Following through without repeated reminders
  • Attending counseling consistently
  • Completing work outside counseling sessions
  • Learning healthier communication and conflict-resolution skills
  • Respecting emotional and physical boundaries
  • Avoiding pressure, threats, guilt, or manipulation
  • Allowing your spouse time to evaluate the change
  • Becoming more emotionally present
  • Sharing responsibilities consistently
  • Expressing appreciation during ordinary life
  • Maintaining change when stress increases
  • Accepting that trust may return slowly
  • Continuing personal growth even if reconciliation remains uncertain

The goal is not perfection. The goal is a pattern that is different enough, consistent enough, and sustained long enough to become trustworthy.

Couples Counseling May Help—but It Is Not Proof of Change

Scheduling couples counseling may be an important step. However, attending therapy is not the same as changing. Counseling may help partners:

  • Understand repeating relationship patterns
  • Improve communication
  • Identify unmet needs
  • Examine emotional withdrawal and defensiveness
  • Develop healthier conflict-resolution skills
  • Increase empathy
  • Clarify boundaries
  • Rebuild trust when appropriate
  • Determine whether reconciliation is realistic
  • Separate with greater understanding and respect when reconciliation is not possible

Do not treat counseling as evidence that your spouse must remain married. Therapy provides an opportunity for work. The work still has to occur.

If Your Spouse Still Chooses Divorce

This may be the outcome you fear most. You may believe: “If they leave, all my effort was meaningless.” It was not necessarily meaningless. Sometimes insight comes after significant consequences. Sometimes people recognize patterns too late to repair a particular relationship. That reality can be painful without making growth pointless. You may still become a healthier person. You may become a more emotionally available parent. You may learn to communicate more effectively. You may understand yourself more deeply. You may stop repeating patterns that caused harm. You may carry new insight into future relationships. You may grieve the marriage while continuing to grow. Change does not guarantee reconciliation. Reconciliation is an outcome involving two people. Personal growth is a responsibility that belongs to you.

A Necessary Distinction: Relationship Distress and Abuse Are Not the Same

Relationship conflict, emotional disconnection, avoidance, broken promises, and inconsistent effort should not automatically be labeled abuse. However, if the relationship includes intimidation, threats, coercive control, physical violence, sexual coercion, stalking, financial control, isolation, retaliation, or fear, the situation requires specialized assessment and safety-focused support.

If abusive behavior has occurred, intense apologies, affection, gifts, promises, or temporary improvement should not be treated as sufficient evidence that the risk has ended. Accountability in these circumstances requires specialized intervention, respect for safety planning, acceptance of consequences, and an end to pressure for reconciliation. Couples counseling may not be appropriate when fear, coercion, or active abuse prevents honest and safe participation.

The Question Is Not Only, “How Do I Get Them to Stay?”

You cannot force trust. You cannot demand forgiveness. You cannot pressure someone into believing that change is permanent. You cannot erase years of pain with several weeks of effort. You can listen. You can accept responsibility. You can seek help. You can respect boundaries. You can change unhealthy patterns. You can become consistent. You can continue the work after the immediate crisis passes.

Instead of asking: “What do I have to do to make my spouse stay?”

Consider asking: “What do I need to understand, accept, repair, and change so that I become healthier—regardless of the outcome?”

Your spouse may eventually trust the change. They may not. But sustainable change cannot depend entirely on controlling their decision.

Final Thought

Perhaps you truly did not understand how much pain your spouse was carrying. Perhaps you believed the marriage was difficult but secure. Perhaps you thought there would always be more time. Then divorce was mentioned, and suddenly you saw everything differently. Your fear may be real. Your regret may be genuine. Your effort may be sincere. Your love may still be strong. But your spouse may be asking whether the person standing before them today will remain after the fear settles and ordinary life returns.

You may want to say: “Please believe that I have changed.”

Your spouse may need to respond: “I need time to experience whether the change will last.”

Do not allow that uncertainty to become an excuse to return to old behaviors. Continue. Continue when you are afraid. Continue when you are disappointed. Continue when you do not receive immediate reassurance. Continue when your spouse remains uncertain. Continue when the crisis becomes quieter. Continue after the dust settles. Because the strongest evidence of change may not be how hard you fight when you are afraid of losing someone. It may be who you consistently choose to become—even when you cannot control whether they stay.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health and human services. He is the founder and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC, where he provides clinical leadership and works to improve access to quality behavioral-health services and supports throughout Kentucky.

Throughout his career, John has worked with individuals, couples, families, children, and adults experiencing relationship difficulties, emotional distress, behavioral challenges, significant life transitions, grief, trauma, anxiety, depression, and other complex circumstances. His professional work emphasizes compassion, personal responsibility, healthy communication, emotional awareness, meaningful behavioral change, and the importance of recognizing the difference between intentions, promises, and consistent actions.

As a therapist, writer, educator, and speaker, John seeks to help people better understand the thoughts, emotions, experiences, and relationship patterns that influence their lives. His writing combines professional knowledge with practical insight and personal reflection to encourage readers to examine difficult experiences with honesty, empathy, accountability, and hope.

John believes that people are capable of meaningful change. However, sustainable change requires more than promises made during moments of fear. It requires accountability, emotional awareness, humility, consistent effort, respect for boundaries, and a willingness to continue growing even when the desired outcome is uncertain.

His educational articles are intended to encourage reflection, promote meaningful conversations, and help individuals make thoughtful, informed, and values-based decisions regarding their relationships, emotional well-being, and personal growth.

References

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as a predictor of the demand-withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 66–89. doi:10.1080/03637759909376462

Dichter, M. E., Thomas, K. A., Crits-Christoph, P., Ogden, S. N., & Rhodes, K. V. (2018). Coercive control in intimate partner violence: Relationship with women’s experience of violence, use of violence, and danger. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 596–604. doi:10.1037/vio0000158

Leo, K., Crenshaw, A. O., Hogan, J. N., Bourne, S. V., Baucom, K. J. W., & Baucom, B. R. W. (2021). A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand-withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 534–545. doi:10.1037/fam0000802

Papp, L. M., Kouros, C. D., & Cummings, E. M. (2009). Demand-withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home. Personal Relationships, 16(2), 285–300. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01223.x

Sangeetha, J., Mohan, S., Hariharasudan, A., & Nawaz, N. (2022). Strategic analysis of intimate partner violence and the cycle of violence in the autobiographical text When I Hit You. Heliyon, 8(6), Article e09727. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09727