Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC

Tag Personal values

Healthy Forms of Validation: Recognizing and Seeking Supportive Affirmation

Validation is the process of understanding, affirming, and accepting one’s feelings, thoughts, or experiences. Receiving healthy validation plays an essential role in building self-esteem, enhancing relationships, and promoting emotional resilience. However, it’s essential to recognize and seek out validation that is healthy and constructive. Here’s an overview of different types of validation and strategies for recognizing and pursuing them effectively.

Why Validation Matters

Validation from others reassures us that our feelings and experiences are understood and accepted. Research shows that receiving consistent, positive validation from supportive people can lead to improved mental health, stronger relationships, and a more secure sense of self (Linehan, 1993). According to self-determination theory, validation can also foster autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are essential for psychological well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

However, relying solely on external validation can be harmful, leading to dependency and reduced self-esteem. Instead, it’s beneficial to balance seeking validation from others with developing self-validation practices.

1. Types of Healthy Validation

  • Emotional Validation: Emotional validation involves acknowledging and accepting someone’s feelings without judgment. This can be as simple as listening attentively, empathizing, and affirming that the other person’s feelings are understandable. Emotional validation reinforces that feelings are valid and that it’s okay to feel what one feels (Linehan, 1993).
  • Validation of Effort and Progress: Praising effort rather than outcomes is a powerful form of validation that can reinforce persistence, self-compassion, and growth. Validating someone’s efforts, even if they fall short of success, promotes a growth mindset, where challenges are seen as opportunities to learn rather than sources of failure (Dweck, 2006).
  • Authentic Affirmations: Authentic affirmations recognize specific qualities, skills, or positive contributions that a person has shown. This validation should be specific rather than generic to reinforce self-worth in an honest, meaningful way (Wood et al., 2008).

2. Recognizing Healthy Validation

Healthy validation has distinct characteristics that make it different from unhealthy or superficial validation. Here’s how to identify it:

  • Respectful and Non-Judgmental: Healthy validation acknowledges your experiences without judgment or dismissal. Research shows that people who validate respectfully build stronger, more trusting relationships (Kross et al., 2014).
  • Specific and Genuine: Unlike generic praise, specific and genuine validation is grounded in real examples. For example, instead of saying “You’re smart,” healthy validation might sound like “I noticed how thoughtful you were when you solved that problem.” This specificity makes the affirmation more meaningful and believable (Wood et al., 2008).
  • Supportive but Not Enabling: Healthy validation encourages personal growth and resilience. It acknowledges your feelings and experiences without enabling unhelpful behaviors, promoting personal accountability and independence (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

3. How to Seek Out Healthy Validation

While it can be challenging to seek validation directly, there are strategies to create environments and relationships where it naturally occurs:

  • Communicate Openly: Sharing how you feel and what kind of support you need can help others understand your perspective and respond in validating ways. Research suggests that people who openly communicate their feelings are more likely to receive affirming responses, as clear communication reduces misunderstandings (Gottman, 2011).
  • Seek Supportive Relationships: Prioritize connections with people who genuinely care about your well-being and listen to you. Friendships and relationships that emphasize empathy, understanding, and honest feedback are more likely to offer healthy validation (Reis & Shaver, 1988).
  • Set Boundaries Around Validation-Seeking: Being mindful of how and when you seek validation can help prevent over-dependence on others. Seeking validation when genuinely needed, rather than as a habit, can help you distinguish between healthy support and dependency (Neff, 2003).

4. Building Self-Validation Skills

Relying on oneself for validation is a healthy, empowering practice that can lead to greater self-confidence and resilience:

  • Practice Self-Compassion: Self-compassion is a form of self-validation that involves treating yourself kindly, especially during challenging times. According to Dr. Kristin Neff, practicing self-compassion can help you become your own source of validation, reducing dependency on external sources (Neff, 2003).
  • Acknowledge Your Own Efforts: Celebrating your progress, no matter how small, reinforces self-validation. This practice helps you recognize your own efforts, fostering a positive self-image and reducing the need for constant external approval (Dweck, 2006).
  • Mindfulness and Journaling: Reflecting on your experiences, thoughts, and emotions through mindfulness or journaling can help you recognize your feelings and validate them internally. This process strengthens self-awareness and helps you rely less on external feedback (Kabat-Zinn, 2003).

Conclusion

Validation is a powerful element of healthy relationships and self-esteem, but it’s essential to seek out healthy, constructive forms of affirmation. By recognizing the qualities of healthy validation, seeking it from supportive people, and building self-validation skills, individuals can enhance their emotional resilience and improve their overall well-being.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field and is based in London Kentucky through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Mr. Collier may be reached by phone at (606) 657–0532 extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com.

References

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
  • Gottman, J. M. (2011). The Science of Trust: Emotional Attunement for Couples. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR). American Psychological Association.
  • Kross, E., et al. (2014). Social rejection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 15-21.
  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
  • Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223-250.
  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Handbook of Personal Relationships, 367-389.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  • Wood, A. M., et al. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 854-871.

This article provides a guide to recognizing and seeking healthy forms of validation based on research and psychological theories. Let me know if there’s any area you’d like to explore in more depth.

Why Do We Feel Guilty When We Take the Time to Relax?

In today’s fast-paced world, feelings of guilt often accompany moments of rest and relaxation. Many individuals experience anxiety and guilt when taking time for themselves, feeling as if they are neglecting responsibilities or failing to meet societal expectations of productivity. This article explores psychological, cultural, and societal reasons behind the guilt associated with relaxation and offers insights into how individuals can overcome this guilt to achieve a healthier work-life balance.

 The Psychological Basis of Guilt

Guilt, as a psychological experience, can be described as a negative emotional state that arises when one perceives that they have done something wrong or violated personal values. Research suggests that guilt often stems from deeply embedded societal and cultural norms, as well as from internalized expectations about productivity and self-worth (Tangney et al., 2007).

For instance, cognitive theories suggest that individuals may develop “should” statements, such as “I should be working,” which create a sense of duty to be constantly productive (Beck, 1976). This cognitive distortion leads to an emotional response that equates rest with irresponsibility or laziness, thus inducing guilt.

 Cultural and Societal Pressures

Cultural norms around productivity significantly contribute to feelings of guilt. In many cultures, particularly those with strong individualistic values, productivity is often equated with personal value (Hofstede, 1984). In these settings, people may feel that their self-worth is directly tied to their achievements, making it challenging to relax without feeling as though they are compromising their personal value.

Furthermore, the “hustle culture” promoted on social media often glorifies overworking and presents relaxation as a luxury for the unmotivated (Shapiro, 2019). This societal influence can lead people to internalize the belief that downtime is wasted time, thereby increasing the guilt associated with it.

The Role of Personal Values and Work Ethic

For many individuals, personal values and work ethic play a role in the experience of guilt during relaxation. Those who value hard work and efficiency may find it difficult to allow themselves time off without feeling that they are violating their core values (Grant, 2013). This guilt may be especially prominent in individuals with a strong sense of duty or responsibility toward others, such as parents, caregivers, or people in helping professions (Gould & Buss, 2015).

Coping Strategies

Overcoming guilt associated with relaxation requires reframing beliefs around productivity and self-care. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) techniques, for instance, can help individuals challenge irrational thoughts around relaxation and redefine it as a necessary component of overall well-being (Beck, 2011). Mindfulness practices also encourage people to stay present in the moment, allowing them to focus on relaxation without ruminating over undone tasks (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).

In addition, developing a structured schedule that includes dedicated time for rest can reduce feelings of guilt. Viewing relaxation as part of a balanced routine, rather than as a diversion from productivity, can help normalize it as a beneficial practice (Levine, 2000).

Feeling guilty about taking time to relax is a common experience that stems from psychological, cultural, and personal factors. Understanding the origins of this guilt and practicing techniques to reframe one’s mindset can help individuals find greater balance. Recognizing that relaxation is essential for well-being, rather than an indulgence, is a vital step in fostering a healthier relationship with oneself.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field. Mr. Collier currently serves as the Executive Director/President and Outpatient service provider through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Mr. Collier may be reached by phone at (606) 657–0532 extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com.

References

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. International Universities Press.
  • Beck, A. T. (2011). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guilford Press.
  • Gould, L., & Buss, D. M. (2015). The Psychology of Moral Emotions. Academic Press.
  • Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success. Penguin Books.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. Bantam.
  • Levine, R. (2000). A Geography of Time: The Temporal Misadventures of a Social Psychologist. Basic Books.
  • Shapiro, J. (2019). The paradox of hustle culture: How working nonstop became a status symbol. Journal of Media Psychology, 12(3), 210-217.
  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.