Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC

Tag teamwork

Marriage and Happiness

Marriage is often idealized as the pinnacle of love and fulfillment—a fairy-tale ending where happiness is guaranteed. The idea that marriage is a ticket to perpetual joy, however, is a misguided notion that sets couples up for disappointment. While happiness is an important component of a healthy marriage, entering into matrimony with the sole purpose of achieving personal happiness is a fundamentally flawed premise. True marital satisfaction comes from commitment, mutual growth, and shared purpose rather than the fleeting emotion of happiness.

Happiness is Not a Constant State

One of the greatest misconceptions about marriage is that it will sustain perpetual happiness. However, research in psychology suggests that happiness is a fluctuating emotional state influenced by numerous factors, including individual well-being, life circumstances, and external stressors (Lyubomirsky, 2007). Expecting a spouse to provide continual happiness places undue pressure on the relationship, often leading to dissatisfaction when reality does not match expectations.

Studies indicate that while marriage can contribute to overall well-being, the “honeymoon phase” of heightened happiness typically fades within the first two years (Lucas et al., 2003). Once the initial excitement subsides, couples who entered marriage seeking continuous joy may feel disillusioned, mistaking normal relationship challenges as signs of incompatibility or failure.

Marriage Requires Effort, Not Just Emotion

Sustainable, long-term marriages are not built on transient feelings but on mutual effort and resilience. The work of Dr. John Gottman, a leading marriage researcher, emphasizes that successful relationships depend on factors such as emotional attunement, conflict resolution skills, and shared meaning (Gottman & Silver, 2015). Couples who focus solely on personal happiness often neglect the foundational aspects of a relationship, such as communication, compromise, and commitment.

Instead of seeing marriage as a source of happiness, couples should approach it as a partnership where both individuals strive to build a fulfilling life together. This perspective aligns with findings that marital satisfaction is linked to a shared sense of purpose and emotional support rather than just romantic bliss (Finkel et al., 2014).

Marriage is About Giving, Not Just Receiving

A marriage centered on individual happiness can quickly devolve into a transactional relationship, where each partner evaluates whether they are getting enough personal satisfaction. This mindset undermines the essence of marriage, which thrives on giving rather than just receiving. Research shows that acts of generosity and selflessness within a marriage contribute to deeper satisfaction and long-term stability (Algoe et al., 2010).

When individuals enter marriage with a self-focused mindset, they may struggle with the inevitable sacrifices and compromises that come with a shared life. True marital fulfillment arises when partners prioritize mutual growth, emotional intimacy, and a shared vision rather than individual gratification.

Happiness is a Byproduct, Not the Goal

When marriage is approached with the understanding that happiness is a byproduct of commitment rather than the primary objective, couples are more likely to build enduring relationships. Happiness in marriage stems from deep connection, shared experiences, and the ability to navigate life’s challenges together. Expecting marriage to provide happiness without effort is like expecting a garden to flourish without watering and tending to it.

Instead of asking, “Will marriage make me happy?” a more constructive question is, “Am I ready to commit, grow, and build a life with this person?” When happiness is viewed as a natural consequence of a healthy relationship rather than the sole reason for getting married, couples are better prepared for the realities of a lifelong partnership.

If the primary reason for getting married is to be happy, you may be setting yourself up for disappointment. Happiness is not a permanent state but a byproduct of commitment, mutual support, and shared purpose. A fulfilling marriage requires effort, resilience, and a willingness to grow together, rather than expecting one’s partner to be a constant source of joy. Those who enter marriage with the right mindset—one of dedication and mutual enrichment—are far more likely to experience lasting satisfaction and a deeper, more meaningful connection.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a seasoned clinical social worker with over 25 years of experience, serving the London, Kentucky area through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Known for his compassionate approach and commitment to quality care, Mr. Collier supports individuals and families with a focus on mental health and well-being. He is available for professional inquiries at (606) 657–0532, extension 101, or by email at [email protected].

References

  • Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the Little Things: Everyday Gratitude as a Booster Shot for Romantic Relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233.
  • Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41.
  • Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining Adaptation and the Set Point Model of Happiness: Reactions to Changes in Marital Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.
  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want. Penguin.
Social Emotional Learning: A Comprehensive Overview

Social Emotional Learning (SEL) has gained prominence as an integral component of education. Defined by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), SEL involves the process of acquiring and applying knowledge, attitudes, and skills to understand and manage emotions, achieve positive goals, demonstrate empathy, establish and maintain relationships, and make responsible decisions (CASEL, 2023).

The growing recognition of SEL stems from its demonstrated impact on students’ academic performance, mental health, and future success. This article delves into the five core components of SEL, its benefits, and the practical implications of integrating SEL into educational systems.

Core Components of Social Emotional Learning

CASEL identifies five core competencies that form the foundation of SEL programs:

1. Self-Awareness: The ability to recognize one’s emotions, thoughts, and values and understand how they influence behavior. Self-awareness also involves accurately assessing personal strengths and weaknesses.

2. Self-Management: Skills related to regulating emotions, setting and achieving goals, and managing stress.

3. Social Awareness: The capacity to empathize with others, appreciate diversity, and understand social norms.

4. Relationship Skills: Abilities to establish and maintain healthy relationships, communicate effectively, and resolve conflicts constructively.

5. Responsible Decision-Making: The process of making ethical and constructive choices about personal and social behavior.

These competencies provide a framework for creating supportive environments where students can thrive both academically and personally.

Benefits of Social Emotional Learning

1. Academic Performance

Research consistently shows that SEL enhances academic outcomes. A meta-analysis of 213 SEL programs revealed an average academic performance gain of 11 percentile points for students participating in SEL programs compared to their peers (Durlak et al., 2011).

2. Behavioral Improvements

SEL reduces behavioral problems such as aggression and disruptive behaviors. Programs that teach emotional regulation and conflict resolution help students respond to challenges more constructively (Jones et al., 2019).

3. Mental Health and Well-Being

Students exposed to SEL demonstrate lower levels of anxiety and depression and higher levels of emotional resilience (Taylor et al., 2017). These programs equip students with coping mechanisms to navigate stress and adversity effectively.

4. Long-Term Success

The skills fostered by SEL extend beyond the classroom. Emotional intelligence, teamwork, and decision-making are essential in the workplace and personal life, leading to higher rates of employment and life satisfaction (Weissberg et al., 2015).

Implementation Strategies for Educators

1. Embedding SEL in Curriculum

SEL can be integrated into daily lessons across subjects by incorporating group discussions, collaborative projects, and reflective writing assignments.

2. Professional Development for Teachers

Training educators to model and teach SEL competencies is critical for program success. Teachers need resources and strategies to address diverse student needs.

3. Family and Community Engagement

Involving families and communities in SEL initiatives ensures consistency in fostering social and emotional skills outside the classroom.

4. Data-Driven Practices

Regular assessment of SEL programs helps educators refine their approaches and demonstrate measurable outcomes.

Challenges and Considerations

While SEL offers numerous benefits, challenges such as lack of funding, teacher resistance, and the need for cultural adaptation must be addressed. Policymakers and educators must prioritize creating equitable SEL programs that consider diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.

Conclusion

Social Emotional Learning is a vital component of modern education, addressing the holistic development of students. By teaching students to navigate emotions, relationships, and decisions, SEL not only enhances academic success but also equips students with lifelong skills. Future research and policy efforts should focus on scaling SEL initiatives and addressing challenges to ensure all students benefit from these transformative programs.

This article is written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years experience in the social work field. He currently serves as the executive director and outpatient behavioral health therapist at Southeast Kentucky Behavioral health based out of London Kentucky. He may be reached by phone at 606-657-0532 extension 101 or by email at [email protected]

References

• Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2023). What is SEL? Retrieved from https://casel.org

• Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.

• Jones, S. M., Bailey, R., & Kahn, J. (2019). The science and practice of social and emotional learning: Implications for state policymaking. The Aspen Institute.

• Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156-1171.

• Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gullotta, T. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning: Research and Practice, 3-19.

This article underscores the transformative potential of SEL in education and beyond, offering a roadmap for educators, policymakers, and communities to prioritize holistic development.

Supporting Children with ADHD in Schools: Strategies for Educational Success

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) affects many children and can present challenges in educational settings, including difficulties with focus, organization, and emotional regulation. However, with proper support, schools can play a crucial role in helping children with ADHD thrive academically and socially. This article outlines evidence-based strategies that educators and administrators can implement to support children with ADHD in achieving educational success.

1. Provide Structured and Predictable Routines

Children with ADHD benefit from consistent routines that reduce uncertainty and help them focus.

• Why it works: Predictable schedules minimize distractions and promote self-regulation (Barkley, 2021).

• Implementation: Schools can use visual schedules, consistent class routines, and clear transitions between activities. Providing a daily agenda at the beginning of the day can help students anticipate tasks and prepare mentally.

2. Use Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and 504 Plans

For students with ADHD, accommodations through IEPs or 504 Plans can address their unique needs.

• Why it works: These plans allow for tailored interventions, helping students access the curriculum effectively (DuPaul & Stoner, 2014).

• Implementation: Accommodations may include extended test time, preferential seating, or modified assignments to reduce cognitive overload.

3. Incorporate Movement Breaks

Frequent physical activity helps children with ADHD regulate their energy and improve focus.

• Why it works: Research shows that movement increases dopamine levels, enhancing attention and motivation (Halperin et al., 2020).

• Implementation: Integrate short movement breaks, such as stretching, walking, or classroom yoga, between lessons. Schools can also provide fidget tools or standing desks for students who struggle with sitting still.

4. Offer Clear and Concise Instructions

Children with ADHD often struggle with processing lengthy or complex directions.

• Why it works: Simplifying instructions reduces cognitive strain and helps students stay focused (Zentall, 2015).

• Implementation: Use step-by-step directions, written instructions, and visual aids. Check for understanding by having students repeat instructions back to the teacher.

5. Provide Positive Reinforcement

Reinforcing positive behavior can motivate students with ADHD to stay on task and meet expectations.

• Why it works: Positive reinforcement fosters a growth mindset and builds self-esteem (Millichap, 2021).

• Implementation: Use praise, reward systems, or token economies to celebrate small successes. Focus on effort and improvement rather than solely on outcomes.

6. Create an ADHD-Friendly Classroom Environment

A well-structured and minimally distracting classroom can help students stay focused.

• Why it works: Environmental adjustments reduce sensory overload and support sustained attention (Pfeiffer, 2022).

• Implementation: Use organizational tools like color-coded folders, labeled bins, and clutter-free desks. Position students away from high-traffic areas and provide quiet zones for focused work.

7. Teach Executive Function Skills

Children with ADHD often need support developing skills such as time management and organization.

• Why it works: Strengthening executive function helps students manage their workload and responsibilities (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012).

• Implementation: Introduce tools like planners, checklists, and digital calendars. Teach students to break down assignments into smaller steps and set achievable goals.

8. Foster Open Communication with Families

Collaboration with parents ensures consistency in strategies used at home and school.

• Why it works: A team-based approach improves problem-solving and creates a unified support system (DuPaul et al., 2011).

• Implementation: Schedule regular parent-teacher conferences, send home progress reports, and maintain open lines of communication via email or apps.

9. Provide Social-Emotional Support

Children with ADHD often face challenges with peer relationships and emotional regulation.

• Why it works: Social-emotional learning (SEL) programs improve self-awareness, empathy, and interpersonal skills (Elias et al., 2015).

• Implementation: Incorporate SEL lessons into the curriculum and provide access to school counselors for emotional support. Use role-playing activities to teach conflict resolution and social skills.

10. Leverage Technology

Technology can help students with ADHD stay organized and engaged in their learning.

• Why it works: Digital tools cater to diverse learning styles and help students track tasks and deadlines (Radesky et al., 2020).

• Implementation: Use apps like ClassDojo for behavior tracking, Google Calendar for scheduling, or gamified learning platforms to maintain engagement.

Schools have a vital role in supporting children with ADHD by creating inclusive environments, providing individualized accommodations, and teaching skills that foster independence. Through structured routines, positive reinforcement, and open communication with families, schools can empower children with ADHD to succeed academically and socially.

This article was written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years experience in the social work field. He currently serves as the executive Director and outpatient behavioral health therapist through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral health based out of London Kentucky. John may be reached by phone at 606-657-0532 extension 101 or by email at [email protected].

References

• Barkley, R. A. (2021). Taking Charge of ADHD: The Complete, Authoritative Guide for Parents. Guilford Press.

• DuPaul, G. J., & Stoner, G. (2014). ADHD in the Schools: Assessment and Intervention Strategies. Guilford Publications.

• DuPaul, G. J., et al. (2011). Home-school collaboration in ADHD management. School Psychology Review, 40(4), 494-512.

• Elias, M. J., et al. (2015). Promoting Social and Emotional Learning: Guidelines for Educators. ASCD.

• Halperin, J. M., et al. (2020). Physical activity intervention improves sustained attention and executive functioning in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(10), 1408-1415.

• Millichap, J. G. (2021). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Handbook: A Physician’s Guide to ADHD. Springer.

• Pfeiffer, S. (2022). Routines for children with ADHD: Why they matter and how to build them. Psychology Today.

• Radesky, J., et al. (2020). Digital technology and ADHD: Benefits and risks. Pediatrics, 145(S2), S157-S162.

• Zentall, S. S. (2015). Environmental support for children with ADHD. Behavioral Interventions, 30(3), 153-164.

• Zelazo, P. D., & Lyons, K. E. (2012). Mindfulness training in childhood. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1023-1031.

The Differences Between a Woman Who Wants a Husband and a Woman Who Wants to Be a Wife

The dynamics of modern relationships are increasingly complex, influenced by societal shifts in gender roles, expectations, and personal values. In the context of marriage, two distinct perspectives often emerge: the desire for a husband versus the desire to be a wife. While these may appear similar on the surface, they represent fundamentally different approaches to partnership and commitment. This article explores these differences and their implications for modern relationships.

1. Motivation for Commitment

A woman who wants a husband may be primarily motivated by the idea of companionship, societal status, or achieving a particular milestone in life. Her focus might center on what a husband can bring to her life—financial stability, emotional support, or social recognition. Conversely, a woman who wants to be a wife often emphasizes the role she seeks to fulfill within a relationship. Her motivation stems from a desire to nurture, build a partnership, and invest in the growth of the marital union.

Research on marital satisfaction suggests that intrinsic motivations, such as personal fulfillment and mutual support, are stronger predictors of long-term happiness than extrinsic factors like societal pressure or financial security (Amato, 2010). This underscores the importance of aligning motivations with the relational roles each partner seeks to embody.

2. Expectations of the Relationship

The expectations held by a woman who wants a husband may be more externally focused, often shaped by cultural norms or personal ideals of what a husband “should” provide. For instance, these expectations might include financial provision, protection, or fulfilling a traditional role within the family unit.

In contrast, a woman who wants to be a wife often adopts a more internally driven perspective. She focuses on what she can contribute to the relationship, such as emotional support, shared responsibilities, and fostering mutual respect. This aligns with the concept of communal orientation in relationships, where the emphasis is on meeting the partner’s needs without expecting direct reciprocation (Clark & Mills, 2012).

3. Approach to Challenges

When challenges arise, the difference in perspective becomes particularly evident. A woman seeking a husband may evaluate problems in terms of what she is or isn’t receiving from her partner. If unmet expectations dominate her perception, it can lead to dissatisfaction or conflict.

Conversely, a woman who desires to be a wife is more likely to approach challenges collaboratively, viewing them as opportunities to strengthen the relationship. This aligns with findings that couples who adopt a team-oriented mindset are better equipped to navigate conflict and maintain marital satisfaction (Markman, Stanley, & Blumberg, 2010).

4. Role of Personal Identity

For a woman who wants a husband, her identity may be intertwined with the social or cultural validation that comes with marriage. The title of “wife” may hold less intrinsic value than the societal perception of being married.

However, a woman who wants to be a wife typically views the role as an extension of her personal identity and values. She may find meaning in the responsibilities and commitments that come with the role, emphasizing personal growth and the deepening of emotional connections within the marriage.

5. Long-Term Compatibility

The difference between wanting a husband and wanting to be a wife has profound implications for long-term compatibility. Relationships built on the former may face challenges if external expectations are not met or if the relationship is not rooted in mutual understanding and shared goals. By contrast, relationships centered on the latter are more likely to thrive, as both partners invest in the well-being of the partnership, prioritizing collaboration over individual expectations.

Studies have shown that marital satisfaction is highest when both partners exhibit high levels of commitment and engage in behaviors that promote mutual trust and respect (Fowers & Olson, 1993). This suggests that aligning relationship goals and motivations is critical for a successful marriage.

Conclusion

The distinction between wanting a husband and wanting to be a wife reflects deeper differences in motivations, expectations, and approaches to relationships. While both perspectives can lead to fulfilling partnerships, understanding and aligning these differences is essential for building a resilient and harmonious marriage. Ultimately, the key lies in fostering a relationship based on shared values, mutual respect, and a commitment to growing together.

References

Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 232-250). Sage.

Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176

Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (2010). Fighting for your marriage: A deluxe revised edition of the classic best-seller for enhancing marriage and preventing divorce. Jossey-Bass.