WELCOME

All posts by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW

What is the Supports for Community Living (SCL) Waiver in Kentucky?

The Supports for Community Living (SCL) Waiver is a Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waiver program in Kentucky that provides long-term care services for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). This waiver is designed to help eligible individuals live in community settings rather than institutional facilities by offering support services tailored to their needs.

Purpose and Goals of the SCL Waiver

The primary goal of the SCL waiver is to promote independence, self-determination, and community integration for individuals with IDD. The program enables participants to receive necessary services in their homes, family homes, or other community-based settings while still maintaining their quality of life and personal choice in care.

According to the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS), the waiver aims to:

  • Reduce institutionalization by offering alternative care options.
  • Encourage community engagement and independent living.
  • Provide person-centered services that cater to individual needs and preferences.
  • Support families and caregivers in maintaining care for their loved ones at home.

Eligibility Requirements

To qualify for the SCL waiver, individuals must meet both financial and medical criteria:

  1. Medical Eligibility:
    • Must have an intellectual or developmental disability.
    • Must require the level of care typically provided in an Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ICF/IID).
  2. Financial Eligibility:
    • Must meet Medicaid income and asset limits as determined by Kentucky Medicaid.

Eligibility is assessed through the Kentucky Department for Medicaid Services (DMS) in conjunction with a qualified assessment process.

Services Provided Under the SCL Waiver

The SCL waiver offers a broad range of services to support individuals in different aspects of daily living, including:

1. Residential and Community Living Supports

  • Supported Employment: Helps individuals find and maintain employment in the community.
  • Personal Assistance: Assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and meal preparation.
  • Adult Day Training: Structured day programs for socialization, skill-building, and recreational activities.
  • Person-Centered Coaching: One on one coach to work specifically on reaching goals and objectives to be more independent.

2. Clinical and Behavioral Support Services

  • Behavioral Support Services: Therapy and intervention to help manage behaviors and improve social interactions.
  • Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy: Rehabilitation services to support functional independence.
  • Respite Care: Temporary relief for family caregivers who provide primary support.

3. Community Integration and Socialization

  • Community Access Services: Encourages participation in social and recreational activities.
  • Transportation Services: Assistance with accessing medical appointments and community activities.

4. Health and Wellness Supports

  • Nursing Services: Medical care provided by registered or licensed nurses.
  • Medication Management: Assistance with medication administration and monitoring.

Applying for the SCL Waiver

The application process for the SCL waiver involves the following steps:

  1. Submission of an Application: Individuals or their guardians must submit an application to the Kentucky Department for Medicaid Services.
  2. Level of Care Assessment: An assessment is conducted to determine if the individual meets the medical criteria for ICF/IID-level care.
  3. Waiting List Placement (if applicable): Due to limited funding, there may be a waiting list for SCL services.
  4. Approval and Development of a Person-Centered Plan (PCP): If approved, a case manager works with the individual and their family to create a person-centered plan outlining the needed services.

Impact of the SCL Waiver

Research indicates that home and community-based services (HCBS) improve the quality of life for individuals with disabilities by providing them with opportunities for employment, education, and social inclusion (Braddock et al., 2022). The Kentucky Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities (DBHDID) has reported that individuals in the SCL program experience better outcomes compared to those in institutional settings.

Challenges and Future Developments

While the SCL waiver provides essential services, challenges remain, including:

  • Long waiting lists: Many eligible individuals face delays in receiving services due to funding limitations.
  • Provider shortages: A lack of qualified healthcare providers, particularly in rural areas, affects service availability.
  • Complex application process: Families often require assistance navigating the Medicaid waiver system.

Efforts are being made to expand waiver slots and streamline service delivery to meet the growing demand for community-based supports.

Conclusion

The Supports for Community Living (SCL) Waiver in Kentucky is a vital Medicaid-funded program that enhances the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. By offering person-centered, community-based services, the waiver helps individuals lead more independent and fulfilling lives outside of institutional settings. While challenges exist, continued policy improvements and increased funding could expand access to these essential supports in the future.

This article has been written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years experience in the social work field. he currently serves as the executive director of SE Kentucky behavioral health based out of London KY. He may be reached by phone 606-657-0532 or by email at John@sekybh.com

References

  • Braddock, D., Hemp, R., & Rizzolo, M. C. (2022). The State of the States in Developmental Disabilities: 2022 Edition. University of Colorado.
  • Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS). (2024). Supports for Community Living Waiver Program Overview. Retrieved from https://chfs.ky.gov
  • Kentucky Department for Medicaid Services (DMS). (2023). Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waivers. Retrieved from https://medicaid.ky.gov

The Pros and Cons of Behavioral Telehealth: Is It Right for You?

Behavioral telehealth, or teletherapy, has become an increasingly popular method for delivering mental health services. With advancements in technology, therapists and clients can now connect remotely through video calls, phone consultations, and online chat-based platforms. While telehealth offers several advantages, it also has limitations that may impact its effectiveness depending on an individual’s needs. This article explores the pros and cons of behavioral telehealth to help you determine whether it is the right choice for you.

The Pros of Behavioral Telehealth

1. Increased Accessibility

One of the biggest advantages of behavioral telehealth is its ability to reach individuals who might otherwise struggle to access therapy. This includes people living in rural or remote areas, those with mobility limitations, and individuals with tight schedules (Hilty et al., 2013).

2. Convenience and Flexibility

Telehealth eliminates the need for travel, allowing clients to attend sessions from the comfort of their homes. This flexibility can be especially beneficial for busy professionals, parents, and those with chronic illnesses (Torous et al., 2020).

3. Reduced Stigma

Some individuals avoid seeking mental health services due to fear of stigma. Telehealth allows for more privacy, as sessions can be conducted in a confidential setting without the need to visit a therapist’s office (Myers & Turvey, 2013).

4. Continuity of Care

For those who relocate frequently or travel often, telehealth ensures that therapy sessions can continue uninterrupted. This is particularly helpful for military families, college students, and frequent travelers (Shore et al., 2014).

5. Cost-Effectiveness

Telehealth can be more affordable than in-person therapy, reducing costs associated with commuting and childcare. Additionally, many insurance companies now cover telehealth services, making mental health care more accessible (Mehrotra et al., 2017).

The Cons of Behavioral Telehealth

1. Technological Barriers

Not everyone has access to reliable internet or a private space for therapy sessions. Technical issues such as poor connectivity or software malfunctions can disrupt sessions and reduce their effectiveness (Yellowlees et al., 2010).

2. Limited Non-Verbal Cues

In traditional therapy, therapists rely on body language, facial expressions, and other non-verbal cues to assess a client’s emotional state. Virtual sessions may limit a clinician’s ability to observe these important cues, potentially affecting the quality of care (Glueckauf et al., 2018).

3. Not Suitable for All Conditions

While telehealth is effective for many mental health conditions, it may not be appropriate for individuals in crisis, those with severe psychiatric disorders, or individuals who require in-person interventions, such as exposure therapy for phobias (Shigekawa et al., 2018).

4. Concerns About Privacy and Security

Online therapy platforms must comply with privacy regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). However, there is always a risk of data breaches or unauthorized access, which may deter some clients from using telehealth services (Lustgarten & Elhai, 2018).

5. Reduced Therapeutic Relationship

Some clients and therapists feel that online therapy lacks the personal connection of face-to-face interactions. The absence of a physical presence may make it harder for some individuals to open up and build trust (Simpson & Reid, 2014).

Is Behavioral Telehealth Right for You?

Deciding whether behavioral telehealth is the right option depends on several factors:

  • Your Needs and Diagnosis: If you have mild to moderate mental health concerns such as anxiety or depression, telehealth may be a convenient option. However, individuals with severe psychiatric conditions may require in-person treatment.
  • Access to Technology: Reliable internet and a private space are necessary for effective telehealth sessions.
  • Comfort Level with Technology: Those who struggle with technology may find in-person therapy more suitable.
  • Insurance Coverage: Check with your insurance provider to determine whether telehealth services are covered.

Behavioral telehealth has transformed mental health care, offering increased accessibility, convenience, and affordability. However, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. While it works well for many individuals, others may find in-person therapy more beneficial. By weighing the pros and cons, you can determine whether telehealth aligns with your mental health needs and lifestyle.

This article has been written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years’ experience in the social work field. he currently serves as the executive director and outpatient behavioral health therapist for Southeast Kentucky behavioral health based out of London KY., He may be reached by phone at 606-657-0532 extension 101 or by email at John@sekybh.com

References

  • Glueckauf, R. L., Maheu, M. M., Drude, K. P., Wells, B. A., Wang, Y., Gustafson, D. J., & Nelson, E.-L. (2018). Survey of psychologists’ telebehavioral health practices: Technology use, ethical issues, and training needs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49(5-6), 301-313.
  • Hilty, D. M., Ferrer, D. C., Parish, M. B., Johnston, B., Callahan, E. J., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2013). The effectiveness of tele-mental health: A 2013 review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(6), 444-454.
  • Lustgarten, S. D., & Elhai, J. D. (2018). Technology use in mental health practice and research: Legal and ethical risks. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 25(2), e12234.
  • Mehrotra, A., Huskamp, H. A., Souza, J., Uscher-Pines, L., Rose, S., Landon, B. E., & Busch, A. B. (2017). Rapid growth in mental health telemedicine use among rural Medicare beneficiaries, wide variation across states. Health Affairs, 36(5), 909-917.
  • Myers, K., & Turvey, C. (2013). Telemental health: Clinical, technical, and administrative lessons learned. Elsevier.
  • Shore, J. H., Yellowlees, P., Caudill, R., Johnston, B., Turvey, C., Mishkind, M., Krupinski, E., Myers, K., Shore, P., Kaftarian, E., & Hilty, D. (2014). Best practices in videoconferencing-based telemental health. Telemedicine and e-Health, 20(2), 96-105.
  • Shigekawa, E., Fix, M., Corbett, G., Roby, D. H., & Coffman, J. (2018). The current state of telehealth evidence: A rapid review. Health Affairs, 37(12), 1975-1982.
  • Simpson, S. G., & Reid, C. L. (2014). Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A review. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 22(6), 280-299.
  • Torous, J., Janmohamed, T., Moreno, C., Miller, B., Currie, M., Brown, J., & Keshavan, M. (2020). Digital mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Digital mental health. JMIR Mental Health, 7(8), e21864.
  • Yellowlees, P., Shore, J. H., & Roberts, L. (2010). Telepsychiatry and e-mental health. American Psychiatric Publishing.

What does it mean to “Submit” to your Husband.
The concept of a wife submitting to her husband is often debated in religious, social, and academic circles. Rooted primarily in biblical teachings, submission in marriage is frequently misunderstood as a form of servitude or oppression. However, a comprehensive understanding of the term, especially in its biblical context, reveals a deeper, more nuanced perspective that emphasizes mutual respect, love, and partnership.

The Biblical Basis of Submission

The idea of submission in marriage originates from several passages in the Bible, with one of the most frequently cited being Ephesians 5:22-24 (New International Version, NIV):

“Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.”

At first glance, this passage may appear to suggest an unequal relationship, but when examined alongside other biblical texts, it becomes clear that submission is not about inferiority but about order and function within marriage.

In Ephesians 5:25, husbands are commanded to “love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” This indicates that a husband’s role is not one of dominance but of self-sacrificial leadership, mirroring Christ’s love for the church.

The Meaning of Submission

1. Submission as Mutual Respect

Biblical submission does not imply blind obedience or suppression of a wife’s voice. Instead, it represents a cooperative and respectful relationship. Ephesians 5:21 states, “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ,” highlighting that submission is a mutual responsibility, not a one-sided obligation.

2. The Role of a Husband’s Leadership

A husband’s leadership in marriage, as described in the Bible, is not about power or control but about responsibility and love. Husbands are called to lead their families in a way that reflects Christ’s sacrificial love. This form of leadership prioritizes the well-being of the wife and family rather than exerting dominance.

3. Submission Does Not Justify Abuse

Many scholars and religious leaders emphasize that submission does not mean tolerating abuse or unhealthy power dynamics. Biblical submission is always within the framework of a loving, Christ-centered relationship. If a husband acts in ways that contradict biblical teachings—such as being abusive, manipulative, or neglectful—he is failing in his role as a Christlike leader (Colossians 3:19).

Cultural and Modern Perspectives

The interpretation of submission has evolved within different cultural and historical contexts. In many traditional societies, submission was often linked to patriarchal structures where men held absolute authority. However, modern Christian perspectives emphasize equality, complementarity, and partnership rather than rigid hierarchy (Piper & Grudem, 1991).

From a psychological standpoint, studies show that marriages characterized by mutual respect, shared decision-making, and emotional support tend to be healthier and more satisfying (Gottman, 1999). This aligns with the biblical model where both spouses contribute uniquely to the marriage while maintaining mutual love and respect.

Practical Application in Marriage

  1. Decision-Making Together – Biblical submission does not mean the husband makes all decisions unilaterally. Rather, both spouses should engage in open communication and decision-making, with the husband leading in a way that prioritizes the family’s well-being.
  2. Honoring Each Other’s Strengths – A successful marriage recognizes and appreciates the unique gifts and strengths each partner brings. Submission does not mean that the wife’s opinions or contributions are less valuable.
  3. Leading with Love and Humility – Husbands are instructed to love their wives as Christ loved the church, which involves humility, patience, and selflessness. True biblical leadership involves servanthood rather than authoritarian rule (Mark 10:42-45).

Submission in marriage, as outlined in the Bible, is not about control or oppression but about love, respect, and partnership. When understood in its proper context, biblical submission enhances marital unity, fosters mutual support, and aligns with the Christian model of love and service. Both spouses are called to honor and respect one another, creating a marriage that reflects Christ’s relationship with His church.

This article was written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work and mental health field. It currently serves as the executive director and outpatient behavioral health therapist at southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health based out of London KY. john may be reached by phone at 6066570532 extension 101 or by email at John@sekybh.com

References

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV)
  • Piper, J., & Grudem, W. (1991). Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism. Crossway.
  • Gottman, J. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
  • Keller, T. (2011). The Meaning of Marriage: Facing the Complexities of Commitment with the Wisdom of God. Penguin.

Would you like any refinements or additional perspectives included?

EVENING / AFTERHOURS COUNSELING APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE!!!!

We’re now offering telehealth and in-person evening appointments for Outpatient Therapy to better serve you and your family! Whether you prefer the convenience of virtual care or a face-to-face session after your workday, our compassionate team is here to provide personalized support for your mental health and wellness needs.

Take the first step towards achieving your goals in a way that fits your schedule.

📞 Call us today at (606) 657-0532 to book your appointment!
🌐 Visit our website at www.sekybh.com for more information.

Your health and well-being are our priority. Let us help you thrive!

Make an Appointment