Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Archives 2026

Why Chase Someone Who Doesn’t Want You?

Understanding Rejection, Self-Worth, and the Psychology of Unrequited Pursuit

Few experiences are as emotionally painful as wanting someone who does not return your feelings. Whether it is the end of a long-term relationship, an unrequited crush, or someone who gradually pulls away, the desire to continue pursuing a person who has clearly communicated disinterest is surprisingly common. Many people find themselves asking, “If I love them enough, why won’t they love me back?” or “Maybe if I just try a little harder, they’ll change their mind.”

The truth is that continuing to chase someone who has chosen not to pursue a relationship often prolongs emotional suffering rather than healing it. Modern psychology suggests that this behavior is rarely about love alone. Instead, it frequently reflects attachment patterns, unmet emotional needs, cognitive biases, and challenges with self-esteem.

Understanding why people chase unavailable partners can help individuals recognize unhealthy patterns, heal from rejection, and develop healthier relationships built on mutual respect and reciprocal affection.

The Human Need for Acceptance

Human beings are wired for connection. According to Baumeister and Leary’s Belongingness Theory, people possess a fundamental motivation to establish and maintain meaningful interpersonal relationships. Social acceptance contributes significantly to emotional well-being, while rejection activates many of the same neurological pathways involved in physical pain.

Research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has demonstrated that social rejection activates the anterior cingulate cortex—the same brain region involved in processing physical pain (Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003). This explains why rejection can literally “hurt.”

Because rejection feels painful, many individuals instinctively attempt to restore the relationship, believing that regaining the person’s affection will relieve the emotional discomfort.

The False Hope of “Winning Them Back”

One of the greatest psychological traps is believing that persistence eventually leads to love.

Popular movies, romance novels, and cultural myths often portray relentless pursuit as romantic. The hero refuses to give up, fights for the relationship, and ultimately wins the person’s heart.

Real life rarely follows this script.

Healthy relationships require mutual desire, not persuasion.

When one individual repeatedly communicates disinterest—either verbally or through consistent behavior—continued pursuit usually creates increasing emotional distance rather than intimacy.

Healthy love cannot be negotiated.

Attachment Theory and Chasing Unavailable People

John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory provides one of the strongest explanations for why some individuals struggle to let go.

People with anxious attachment styles often fear abandonment and become highly sensitive to signs of rejection. Rather than accepting distance, they frequently intensify efforts to restore closeness.

These behaviors may include:

  • Frequent texting
  • Constant reassurance seeking
  • Monitoring social media
  • Attempting repeated conversations
  • Believing they simply need one more opportunity

Ironically, these behaviors often overwhelm the other person, reinforcing withdrawal and creating what psychologists call the anxious-avoidant cycle.

Meanwhile, individuals with secure attachment generally recognize rejection as painful but temporary. They mourn the loss while maintaining confidence that healthier relationships remain possible.

Self-Esteem and Personal Value

Sometimes the person being pursued is not actually the central issue.

Instead, rejection becomes interpreted as evidence of personal inadequacy.

Common internal beliefs include:

  • “I’m not attractive enough.”
  • “I’m not lovable.”
  • “I wasn’t good enough.”
  • “If I improve myself enough, they’ll finally choose me.”

This transforms the pursuit into an attempt to repair damaged self-esteem rather than build a genuine relationship.

Research consistently demonstrates that individuals with lower self-esteem experience greater emotional distress following romantic rejection and may engage in more persistent attempts to restore the relationship (Murray, Holmes, & Collins, 2006).

The Brain Craves Uncertainty

One surprising reason people continue chasing unavailable partners involves dopamine.

Contrary to popular belief, dopamine is not merely the brain’s “pleasure chemical.”

Instead, dopamine is heavily involved in anticipation, motivation, and reward prediction.

Intermittent reinforcement—occasional texts, mixed signals, brief moments of affection—creates one of the strongest behavioral conditioning schedules known in psychology.

This principle was originally demonstrated by B. F. Skinner’s work on variable-ratio reinforcement.

Just as gambling becomes addictive because rewards are unpredictable, uncertain romantic attention can become psychologically compelling.

The occasional positive interaction creates hope that “this time things will be different.”

The Sunk Cost Fallacy

Economists describe the sunk cost fallacy as continuing to invest in something simply because significant resources have already been invested.

Relationships are no exception.

Individuals often think:

  • “I’ve spent five years loving this person.”
  • “I can’t just give up now.”
  • “I’ve sacrificed too much.”

Past investment does not increase future probability of success.

Healthy decisions should be based upon present reality rather than previous emotional investments.

Romantic Obsession Is Not the Same as Love

People frequently confuse obsession with love.

Love seeks the good of both people.

Obsession seeks relief from one’s own emotional discomfort.

Love respects boundaries.

Obsession ignores boundaries.

Love accepts another person’s freedom.

Obsession attempts to overcome resistance.

One of the clearest indicators of mature love is the willingness to respect another person’s autonomous decision—even when that decision causes pain.

Idealization Distorts Reality

When someone becomes emotionally unavailable, many individuals unconsciously idealize them.

Their strengths become exaggerated.

Their flaws become minimized.

Their absence increases perceived value.

Psychologists refer to this as scarcity bias.

The less available something becomes, the more desirable it appears.

Ironically, people often chase an imagined version of the person rather than the individual who actually exists.

Self-Respect Requires Acceptance

Accepting rejection does not mean accepting personal worthlessness.

It simply means recognizing that compatibility requires two willing participants.

Healthy love cannot exist without:

  • Mutual interest
  • Mutual respect
  • Mutual effort
  • Mutual commitment

When only one individual is carrying the relationship, the relationship no longer exists—it has become unilateral pursuit.

Self-respect means recognizing when to stop investing emotional energy where it is no longer welcomed.

Letting Go Is an Act of Strength

Walking away is often misunderstood as weakness or surrender.

In reality, it frequently reflects emotional maturity.

Letting go acknowledges several important truths:

  • You cannot force attraction.
  • You cannot negotiate genuine affection.
  • You cannot convince someone to value what they do not choose.
  • You deserve relationships where your presence is appreciated rather than tolerated.

Healing begins when energy shifts away from changing another person and toward growing oneself.

Building Healthier Relationships

Research consistently identifies several characteristics associated with satisfying long-term relationships:

  • Emotional responsiveness
  • Open communication
  • Secure attachment
  • Shared values
  • Mutual investment
  • Respect for personal boundaries
  • Reciprocity

Healthy love is rarely characterized by relentless pursuit.

Instead, it develops through mutual willingness to know, value, and support one another.

Conclusion

The question is not simply, “Why would you chase someone who doesn’t want you?”

A more meaningful question is:

“What inside of me believes I must earn the love that should be freely given?”

Often, chasing reflects unresolved fears of abandonment, low self-esteem, anxious attachment, or hope that persistence will overcome rejection. Yet genuine love is never created through pressure or persuasion.

The healthiest relationships arise when two individuals freely choose one another each day. While rejection is painful, it is also clarifying. It reveals where emotional energy should no longer be invested and creates space for relationships founded on mutual respect, authentic affection, and shared commitment.

Ultimately, self-worth should never depend upon another person’s willingness to stay. The moment you stop chasing someone who has chosen to walk away, you begin walking toward a healthier version of yourself.

Here is the revised About the Author section with your preferred credentials included.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S, is a licensed clinical social worker, behavioral health leader, educator, and author with more than two decades of experience helping individuals, couples, families, and communities navigate life’s emotional, relational, and spiritual challenges. Throughout his career, he has worked extensively with individuals experiencing anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), trauma, grief, relationship difficulties, and behavioral concerns across the lifespan.

Drawing upon years of clinical practice, leadership in community behavioral health, and a deep commitment to lifelong learning, John is passionate about translating evidence-based knowledge into practical guidance that readers can apply to everyday life. His writing blends sound research, clinical insight, compassionate understanding, and practical application, making complex topics accessible to professionals, students, and readers seeking meaningful personal growth.

In addition to his clinical work, John has served in executive and leadership roles within community behavioral health, helping develop programs that expand access to quality behavioral health services, strengthen families, and promote resilience throughout underserved communities. His commitment to education extends beyond clinical practice through the development of books and resources that encourage emotional wellness, healthy relationships, effective parenting, leadership, Christian living, Freemasonry, and lifelong personal growth.

John is a prolific author whose works span behavioral health, Christian devotionals, Freemasonry, leadership, parenting, relationships, personal development, and poetry. Whether writing scholarly works, practical guides, devotional literature, or reflective poetry, he strives to combine professional knowledge with compassion, wisdom, and hope. His writing is grounded in the belief that knowledge should not merely inform—it should inspire transformation and equip readers with practical tools for everyday life.

John believes that lasting change begins with self-awareness, is strengthened through intentional choices, and flourishes in relationships characterized by integrity, respect, grace, and genuine human connection. Through every book he writes, his mission is to encourage readers to discover hope in adversity, strength in struggle, and purpose in every season of life, empowering them to build healthier relationships, stronger communities, and more meaningful lives.

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. Macmillan.

Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00838.2004

American Psychological Association. (2023). APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org

Leary, M. R. (2015). Emotional Responses to Interpersonal Rejection. Oxford University Press.

Riding for a Cause: Raising Awareness for Progeria

Community members and motorcycle riders recently gathered at Man O’ War Harley-Davidson in Lexington, Kentucky, for the 15th Annual Zach Attack Memorial Ride. The charity motorcycle ride was held in memory of Zach and helped support the important work of the Progeria Research Foundation.

More than simply a motorcycle ride, the event brought together families, friends, supporters, and members of the riding community for a shared purpose. Participants honored the life and legacy of Zach while raising awareness and funds for children and families affected by one of the world’s rarest genetic disorders.

What Is Progeria?

Progeria, formally known as Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome, is an extremely rare genetic condition that causes children to experience rapid physical aging. Children with Progeria generally appear healthy at birth, but signs of the condition often begin to develop during the first few years of life.

Zack

Common characteristics may include slowed growth, loss of hair, changes in the appearance of the skin, joint stiffness, and other physical complications associated with accelerated aging. The most serious health concerns are connected to the cardiovascular system, including the early development of heart disease and an increased risk of stroke.

Although Progeria causes significant physical challenges, it does not generally affect a child’s intelligence. Children living with the condition attend school, develop friendships, enjoy hobbies, love their families, and dream about the future. Their courage, resilience, and positive outlook frequently inspire everyone fortunate enough to meet them.

Research Is Creating Hope

Medical research has increased understanding of Progeria and has led to treatments that may improve the health and quality of life of affected children. The Progeria Research Foundation plays an essential role in advancing research, identifying children throughout the world, supporting families, encouraging clinical studies, and pursuing more effective treatments and, ultimately, a cure.

Fundraising events such as the Zach Attack Memorial Ride help make this work possible. Every donation, registration fee, sponsorship, and mile traveled can contribute to continued research and greater public awareness.

Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health Participates in the Ride

John Collier, Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, participated in the fundraiser ride as part of the organization’s commitment to community involvement, education, and awareness.

Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health believes that promoting health and wellness extends beyond the walls of an office or treatment facility. The organization takes as many opportunities as possible to participate in events that educate the public, increase awareness of important health concerns, and support individuals and families facing difficult circumstances.

Participation in the Zach Attack Memorial Ride provided an opportunity to stand alongside families, riders, volunteers, and community supporters while helping bring attention to Progeria. It also demonstrated Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health’s belief that meaningful community service includes showing up, listening, learning, and supporting causes that improve the lives of others.

Community education is an important part of reducing misunderstanding and helping people respond to health conditions with greater knowledge and compassion. Rare disorders may affect a comparatively small number of individuals, but each child and family deserves support, dignity, access to treatment, and hope for the future.

Motorcycles as Vehicles of Compassion

Events such as the Zach Attack Memorial Ride remind us that motorcycles can represent much more than recreation. They can become vehicles of compassion, fellowship, remembrance, and hope.

When riders come together for a charitable purpose, every motorcycle becomes part of a larger message. That message tells affected families that they are not alone. It honors the memory of those whose lives have touched others. It also gives community members a practical way to support research that may improve and extend the lives of children affected by Progeria.

Continuing Zach’s Legacy

As the motorcycles gathered and riders prepared to begin the journey, the purpose of the day was clear: to continue Zach’s legacy, support affected families, and help move Progeria research forward.

By working together, communities can transform remembrance into action. A memorial ride can fund research. A conversation can increase awareness. A shared article can introduce someone to a condition they had never heard of before. A single act of compassion can help a family feel seen and supported.

“Sometimes the longest journeys are measured not in miles, but in the lives they help change. Every mile ridden in Zach’s honor brings us one step closer to hope.”

Learn More and Support Progeria Research

To learn more about Progeria, current research, available treatments, and ways to support affected children and their families, visit the Progeria Research Foundation.

Visit the Progeria Research Foundation

Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health is committed to participating in educational, charitable, and community-awareness opportunities that promote compassion, understanding, and healthier communities.

When Hope Hurts: The Psychology of Letting Go Without Losing Yourself

The Sudden Silence

One of the most painful aspects of losing an important relationship is not merely losing the person—it is losing the rhythm of everyday life.

Good morning messages disappear.

Conversations that once filled hours are replaced by silence.

Inside jokes become memories.

A familiar voice is suddenly absent.

The brain is remarkably adaptive to routines, especially those associated with emotional safety and reward. When a significant relationship abruptly ends, the mind continues expecting those interactions long after they have stopped. Neuroscientific research suggests that romantic attachment activates many of the same neural reward pathways involved in habit formation, making separation feel similar to withdrawal from a deeply ingrained pattern of connection. (Wiley Online Library⁠)

This is why many people report that the hardest moments are not dramatic events but ordinary ones: reaching for the phone, wanting to share good news, or instinctively wondering what the other person is doing.

The absence itself becomes emotionally loud.

⸻

The Search for Answers

Following relational loss, many individuals begin mentally reviewing every conversation, every text message, and every interaction.

“Did I miss something?”

“Was there a warning sign?”

“How could everything change so quickly?”

Psychologists refer to this repetitive thinking as rumination. Rumination differs from healthy reflection because it continually revisits the same questions without producing meaningful resolution.

The mind believes that if enough information is gathered, the pain will decrease. Unfortunately, emotional pain rarely obeys logic.

Instead, rumination often creates additional uncertainty by generating multiple possible explanations, none of which can be confirmed. Ironically, the more the individual thinks, the less certain they often become.

⸻

The Pain of Not Knowing

Perhaps the most difficult aspect of unexpected relational endings is uncertainty. People frequently assume that closure comes from receiving an explanation.

Research on ambiguous loss, however, suggests otherwise. Pauline Boss describes ambiguous loss as a form of grief characterized by uncertainty, incomplete information, and the inability to obtain definitive answers. Rather than allowing grief to progress naturally, ambiguity often keeps the grieving process active because the mind continues searching for certainty that may never arrive. (Wiley Online Library⁠)

In many relationship endings, the question is not simply, “Why did this happen?”

It becomes,

“Was any of it real?”

“Did they ever feel the same?”

“Could things still change?”

These unanswered questions often become more painful than the loss itself. Ironically, many people eventually realize that even receiving answers would not necessarily reduce their suffering. Sometimes explanations create new questions rather than peace.

⸻

Idealization and the Fantasy of Perfection

Another common psychological response involves idealization. After separation, the mind naturally emphasizes positive memories while minimizing imperfections. This process is understandable.

Healthy relationships contain meaningful experiences, and those experiences deserve to be remembered. However, emotional deprivation often magnifies those memories. Over time, the person who was loved gradually becomes transformed into the person who was hoped for.

Reality slowly gives way to imagination. One begins remembering not only who the individual actually was but who they might have become. This distinction is important. Loving someone does not require believing they were perfect.

Yet grief often creates a version of the relationship that feels almost flawless. As a result, people may find themselves grieving both the real relationship and the imagined future that will never occur.

⸻

When Words and Actions No Longer Match

One of the greatest emotional conflicts occurs when a person’s previous words seem inconsistent with their current behavior. Statements of affection become difficult to reconcile with distance. Promises seem incompatible with silence. The mind desperately attempts to force these contradictory experiences into a coherent story.

This psychological discomfort resembles what cognitive psychologists describe as cognitive dissonance—the distress experienced when two seemingly incompatible realities exist simultaneously.

The individual begins asking:

“Which version was real?”

Unfortunately, both may have been genuine. People’s feelings can change. Circumstances can shift. Fear can alter behavior. Recognizing that reality is often more complex than simple deception or simple sincerity can reduce some of the relentless self-questioning.

⸻

Hope Versus Healing

Perhaps no emotional struggle is more difficult than deciding what to do with hope. Hope itself is not unhealthy. Hope allows people to endure difficult circumstances. Hope inspires reconciliation. Hope sustains faith.

However, hope becomes problematic when life is emotionally placed on hold waiting for another person’s decision. There is a significant psychological difference between these two statements:

“If they ever reach out, I will thoughtfully decide what is best.”

versus

“My healing cannot begin until they come back.”

The first allows growth. The second postpones it. Maintaining hope while continuing to build one’s own life represents emotional resilience rather than emotional denial.

⸻

Respecting Boundaries While Grieving

One of the most loving—and painful—choices an individual may make is respecting another person’s request for distance. Choosing not to contact someone who has requested no contact requires tremendous emotional discipline. It means accepting discomfort without immediately acting to relieve it.

Psychologically, this reflects delayed gratification and emotional regulation rather than emotional indifference. Respecting boundaries does not mean feelings disappear. Instead, it demonstrates that love does not require violating another person’s expressed wishes.

⸻

Protecting the Heart Without Closing It

Many individuals eventually reach an emotional crossroads. Part of them longs for reconciliation. Another part fears experiencing the same heartbreak again. This internal conflict reflects two fundamental human needs:

* The need for connection.
* The need for safety.

Neither desire is wrong. Healthy recovery involves acknowledging both rather than allowing either one to dominate. Emotional healing is not learning never to trust again. It is learning that trust should grow alongside consistency over time.

⸻

Living With Unanswered Questions

Perhaps one of the greatest acts of emotional maturity is learning to tolerate uncertainty. Human beings naturally seek complete stories. Relationships, however, often end without complete explanations. Acceptance does not require understanding everything. Acceptance sometimes means acknowledging:

“I may never know exactly why this happened, but I can still choose how I respond.”

That choice gradually shifts emotional energy away from speculation and toward personal growth.

⸻

Conclusion

Losing someone who became woven into daily life creates far more than loneliness. It disrupts identity, routine, expectation, and hope. The resulting sadness is not evidence of weakness. It is evidence that the relationship mattered. Healing rarely occurs because every question has been answered. Healing begins when individuals gradually recognize that their peace no longer depends upon receiving those answers.

Hope may remain.

Love may remain.

Memories certainly remain.

Yet emotional freedom develops when one’s future is no longer held hostage by another person’s silence. Sometimes the strongest act of love is not chasing someone who has walked away. Sometimes it is quietly honoring their decision while continuing to become the person you were always meant to be.

⸻

References

Boss, P. (2007). Ambiguous Loss Theory: Challenges for Scholars and Practitioners. Family Relations, 56(2), 105–111. (Wiley Online Library⁠)

Boss, P. (2014). Ambiguous Loss: A Complicated Type of Grief When Loved Ones Disappear. Bereavement Care, 33(2), 63–69. (Taylor & Francis Online⁠)

Boss, P. (2016). The Context and Process of Theory Development: The Story of Ambiguous Loss. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(3), 269–286. (Wiley Online Library⁠)

Boss, P. (2004). Ambiguous Loss Research, Theory, and Practice: Reflections After 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 551–566. (Wiley Online Library⁠)

This article could also be expanded into a 10–15 page chapter by incorporating attachment theory (Bowlby and Ainsworth), grief models (Worden and Kübler-Ross), cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger), the neuroscience of romantic attachment (Fisher), and practical coping strategies with additional peer-reviewed citations.

Going All In: The Hidden Risks of Rushing Into a Relationship

There is something undeniably romantic about the phrase “going all in.” Movies celebrate it. Love songs glorify it. Friends often admire people who seem fearless enough to dive headfirst into love. We are told that real love requires vulnerability, commitment, and complete investment.

While commitment is essential for a healthy relationship, there is an important distinction between healthy commitment and premature emotional investment. One is built on knowledge, trust, and experience. The other is often built on hope, attraction, and assumptions.

Many relationships don’t fail because two people were incompatible. They fail because they became emotionally committed long before they truly knew one another.

The Difference Between Attraction and Knowledge

Attraction happens quickly. Knowledge takes time. During the first weeks or months of dating, we naturally see the best version of another person. Psychologists sometimes refer to this as the honeymoon phase, where the brain is flooded with dopamine, oxytocin, and other neurochemicals that create excitement, optimism, and emotional attachment (Fisher, 2004). Unfortunately, these same chemicals can reduce our ability to evaluate a relationship objectively.

When people “go all in” too quickly, they often mistake:

  • Chemistry for compatibility
  • Passion for stability
  • Attention for commitment
  • Potential for reality

Those are not the same things.

We Fall in Love With Who We Think They Are

One of the greatest dangers of rushing a relationship is that we begin filling in the blanks ourselves. Instead of learning who someone truly is, we imagine who they could become. We overlook inconsistencies. We excuse red flags.

We create explanations for behaviors we don’t fully understand. Psychologists call this idealization—seeing another person through the lens of hope rather than reality (Murray, Holmes, & Griffin, 1996). The problem is that relationships are built on reality, not imagination. Eventually, every relationship moves from fantasy to reality. When that happens, many people don’t feel like their partner changed. Instead, they finally see what was there all along.

Emotional Investment Changes Your Judgment

Imagine buying a house. Would you purchase it after walking through the front door for five minutes? Probably not. You would inspect the foundation. Look at the roof. Check for water damage. Review the neighborhood. Ask difficult questions. Relationships deserve at least that much careful consideration. Yet emotionally, many people commit after only a handful of exciting conversations. Once we become emotionally invested, our brains begin protecting that investment.

Instead of asking, “Is this the right person?”

we begin asking, “How can I make this work?”

Those are completely different questions.

The Cost of Ignoring Red Flags

Red flags rarely appear as dramatic warning signs. Most begin as small moments. Perhaps they become irritated when they don’t get their way. Maybe they avoid accountability. Perhaps they speak disrespectfully about former partners. Maybe they struggle with honesty. Perhaps they become controlling in subtle ways. Someone who rushes into commitment often dismisses these concerns because the emotional reward feels greater than the potential risk. Unfortunately, ignored patterns rarely disappear. They usually become stronger. Dating is not primarily about convincing someone to stay. It is about discovering whether staying would be wise.

Love Needs Observation

Healthy relationships require curiosity. Observe how someone handles disappointment. Observe how they manage stress. Observe how they treat people who have nothing to offer them. Observe how they speak about family. Observe whether their words consistently match their actions. Character reveals itself over time. No conversation can replace experience. No promise can replace consistency. No chemistry can replace integrity.

Why Slow Relationships Often Last Longer

Research consistently suggests that relationships built gradually often develop stronger foundations because trust is earned rather than assumed (Stanley, Rhoades, & Markman, 2006). People sometimes fear moving slowly because they worry someone else will “take” the person they’re dating. Ironically, healthy people generally respect appropriate pacing. Individuals who pressure immediate commitment often reveal more about their own insecurity than about their love. Real intimacy grows. It cannot be rushed.

The Difference Between Commitment and Surrender

Healthy commitment says: “I’m choosing you because I know who you are.”

Unhealthy surrender says: “I’m choosing you because I hope you’ll become who I need.”

One is based on evidence. The other is based on emotion. One grows stronger over time. The other becomes increasingly fragile.

Questions Worth Asking Yourself

Before going “all in,” consider asking yourself:

  • What do I actually know about this person’s character?
  • Have I seen them during conflict?
  • How do they respond when they don’t get what they want?
  • Do their actions consistently match their words?
  • Am I attracted to who they are today or who I hope they’ll become?
  • If nothing about this person ever changed, would I still choose this relationship five years from now?

These questions may not feel romantic, but they are deeply loving—because they protect both people from building a relationship on unrealistic expectations.

A Better Way to Love

Moving slowly does not mean loving less. It means loving wisely. Healthy relationships are not races.

They are discoveries. Every shared experience reveals another layer of a person’s character. Trust is built 0through repeated consistency. Respect grows through mutual understanding. Love deepens through truth rather than fantasy.

Going “all in” is admirable when it follows genuine knowledge of another person. Going all in before you truly know someone is less an act of courage than a gamble. The strongest relationships are rarely built by those who rushed toward commitment. They are built by two people who allowed time to reveal character, chose honesty over fantasy, and discovered that lasting love is not found by moving faster—it is found by building a foundation strong enough to support a lifetime.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a licensed clinical social worker, therapist, author, and educator with extensive experience helping individuals, couples, and families navigate relationship challenges, anxiety, trauma, and emotional well-being. Throughout his career, he has worked with people from diverse backgrounds, combining evidence-based psychological principles with practical, real-world applications that readers can immediately apply to their daily lives.

John’s writing bridges the gap between academic research and everyday experience, making complex psychological concepts understandable and useful. His work emphasizes emotional maturity, healthy communication, personal responsibility, and building relationships founded on trust, authenticity, and mutual respect. Whether writing about mental health, family dynamics, leadership, or personal growth, his goal is to provide readers with insights that encourage lasting change and healthier, more meaningful lives.

References

Fisher, H. (2004). Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Henry Holt.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55(4), 499–509.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (Revised ed.). Harmony Books.