WELCOME

Tag anxiety

What Is Overparenting?

Overparenting is a pattern of parenting in which a caregiver provides developmentally inappropriate levels of control, monitoring, problem-solving, and “help” that limits a child’s chances to build autonomy and coping skills. Researchers often describe it as excessive directiveness and involvement that goes beyond what the child needs at their age or stage. (guilfordjournals.com)

You’ll also hear overparenting discussed as “helicopter parenting” (hovering and intervening quickly) and sometimes “lawnmower/snowplow parenting” (removing obstacles before the child encounters them). In research, these terms commonly point to the same general issue: too much parental management, too little child agency. (PMC)

What Overparenting Looks Like in Real Life

Overparenting isn’t the same as being warm, involved, or protective. It’s more about how involvement is delivered—especially when it replaces a child’s learning opportunities.

Common signs include:

  • Solving problems the child could reasonably solve (calling teachers/coaches/bosses to fix issues, negotiating consequences, managing conflicts for them) (apa.org)
  • Over-monitoring and micromanaging daily routines, schoolwork, friendships, or activities beyond what’s age-appropriate (Wiley Online Library)
  • Overprotecting from normal risk and discomfort (not allowing failure, discomfort, or independent decision-making) (PMC)
  • Excessive tangible help (doing tasks for the child—executive functioning “scaffolding” that never fades) (guilfordjournals.com)

Why Overparenting Happens

Overparenting is usually driven by good intentions and real pressure, not selfishness. Common contributors include:

  • Parent anxiety and fear (about safety, achievement, social standing, or future stability) (guilfordjournals.com)
  • Cultural and economic pressures that frame childhood as high-stakes and competitive (sometimes called “intensive parenting”) (OUP Academic)
  • A mismatch between a child’s needs and the parent’s support level (support doesn’t gradually step back as skills grow) (guilfordjournals.com)

What the Research Says About Potential Impacts

Research findings are nuanced (and many studies are correlational), but the overall pattern is consistent: higher overparenting/helicopter parenting is often associated with weaker adjustment and well-being, especially in adolescence and emerging adulthood.

Mental health and distress

A systematic review of helicopter parenting studies found that most included studies reported relationships with higher anxiety and/or depression symptoms (noting that many studies are cross-sectional and can’t prove direction of cause). (PMC)

Autonomy, self-efficacy, and adjustment

The APA summarized research suggesting that overcontrolling parenting can interfere with children’s ability to adjust in school and social settings and may be linked with poorer functioning when kids must manage independently. (apa.org)

Family communication and satisfaction

Research has also linked overparenting with lower-quality parent–child communication and indirect effects on family satisfaction. (Wiley Online Library)

Emerging adulthood outcomes

Classic work in this area has reported associations between helicopter parenting and poorer psychological well-being in college-aged samples. (Taylor & Francis Online)

Important nuance: Some parental involvement is healthy and protective. The risk tends to increase when support becomes controlling, intrusive, or prevents normal independence-building. (PMC)

Overparenting vs. Healthy Support: A Simple Rule

A practical way to distinguish healthy involvement from overparenting:

  • Healthy support: “I’ll help you think this through, then you try.”
  • Overparenting: “I’ll handle this so you don’t struggle.”

The goal isn’t to step back emotionally—it’s to step back operationally as the child’s capacity grows. (guilfordjournals.com)

How to Reduce Overparenting Without Becoming Hands-Off

Evidence-informed strategies that align with what researchers emphasize about autonomy and development:

  1. Shift from rescuing to coaching
    Ask: “What’s your plan?” “What are two options?” “What’s the next small step?”
  2. Use “fade-out” support
    Provide structure early, then gradually remove it as competence increases.
  3. Normalize safe failure
    Let children experience manageable consequences and discomfort—this is how coping grows. (OUP Academic)
  4. Check your anxiety channel
    If your urge to intervene spikes, pause and ask: “Is this about my fear or their need?” (Parent anxiety is commonly discussed as a driver.) (guilfordjournals.com)
  5. Keep warmth high, control appropriate
    Connection protects; overcontrol can backfire. Aim for support + autonomy, not one or the other. (PMC)

This article was written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S.  Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the Social Work field.  He currently service as the Executive Director and Outpatient Therapist at Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health in London Kentucky.  He may be reached by phone at (606) 657-0532 or by email at john@sekybh.com.

References

  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2018). Helicopter parenting may negatively affect children’s behavior and mental health, study suggests. (apa.org)
  • Lawson, D. W. (2025). Extended parental care and the evolution of overparenting. (OUP Academic)
  • LeMoyne, T., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? Helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. (Taylor & Francis Online)
  • Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent–child communication, and family satisfaction. (Wiley Online Library)
  • Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. (guilfordjournals.com)
  • Vigdal, J. S., & Brønnick, K. (2022). A systematic review of “helicopter parenting” and its associations with mental health and adjustment. (PMC)
What is a Situationship? Exploring the Pros and Cons

In modern relationship dynamics, the term “situationship” has become increasingly popular. Though not officially recognized in traditional psychological or sociological terms, a situationship is generally defined as a romantic or sexual relationship that exists without clear, established boundaries or long-term commitment. Unlike casual dating, situationships often involve a level of emotional connection that blurs the lines between a formal relationship and something more casual.

A situationship typically arises when two individuals engage in a relationship-like dynamic without defining their intentions. Unlike a committed relationship, a situationship often lacks labels and exclusivity. It can involve spending time together, sharing emotional intimacy, or even acting like a couple in public, but without the explicit commitment of being “official.”

Characteristics of a Situationship

  • Lack of Definition: Neither party defines the relationship.
  • Inconsistent Communication: There may be regular interaction at times, followed by periods of distance.
  • Emotional Ambiguity: Both individuals may feel uncertain about where they stand.
  • Physical Intimacy Without Exclusivity: Sexual involvement may occur without an agreement to be monogamous.

The Pros of a Situationship

  1. Flexibility and Freedom: A situationship allows individuals to explore a connection without the pressures of long-term commitment. For those focusing on careers, education, or personal growth, it can provide companionship without demanding a structured relationship.
    • Source: Kaplan, H. (2020). “Modern Relationship Dynamics.” Journal of Social Psychology.
  2. Low Pressure: Situationships often lack the formal expectations tied to traditional relationships, reducing stress related to meeting familial or societal norms.
  3. Exploration of Compatibility: It can serve as a testing ground to evaluate compatibility before entering a committed relationship.
  4. Autonomy: Both individuals retain their independence, allowing for personal freedom and decision-making.

The Cons of a Situationship

  1. Emotional Uncertainty: The lack of clarity can lead to confusion, anxiety, or unmet expectations. People involved in situationships often report feelings of insecurity about the other person’s intentions.
    • Source: Miller, R. S. (2018). “Emotional Costs of Ambiguous Relationships.” Relationship Studies Quarterly.
  2. Uneven Investment: One party may develop deeper feelings, leading to a mismatch in emotional investment and potential heartbreak.
  3. Lack of Growth: Without clear direction, a situationship may stagnate, leaving individuals in a limbo that prevents them from pursuing more meaningful relationships.
  4. Social Challenges: Explaining a situationship to friends or family can be challenging, often leading to judgment or misunderstanding.

Navigating a Situationship

To navigate a situationship successfully, open communication is essential. Discussing intentions and boundaries early on can help both parties align their expectations. If the relationship becomes unfulfilling or one person desires a more formal commitment, addressing these concerns is crucial to avoid prolonged emotional strain.

A situationship can provide a casual and flexible connection for individuals who are not ready for a formal commitment. However, it carries the risk of emotional ambiguity and unmet expectations. Understanding the pros and cons can help individuals decide whether a situationship aligns with their personal goals and emotional well-being.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

This article has been written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW-S. collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field. he currently serves as the Executive Director and outpatient provider at Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health based out of London Kentucky. He may be reached by phone at (606) 657-0532, extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

References

  • Kaplan, H. (2020). “Modern Relationship Dynamics.” Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Miller, R. S. (2018). “Emotional Costs of Ambiguous Relationships.” Relationship Studies Quarterly.
  • Carter, P. (2019). The New Rules of Love: Understanding Modern Relationships. HarperCollins.
  • Johnson, T. A. (2021). “Navigating Emotional Ambiguity in Situationships.” Psychology Today.

How Trauma Changes the Brain: What You Need to Know

Trauma, whether it’s from a physical injury or an emotional experience, can have a lasting impact on the brain. Thanks to research in neuroscience, we now know that trauma doesn’t just affect how we feel—it actually changes how the brain works. Understanding these changes can help us see why trauma has such powerful effects and how recovery is possible.

What Happens to the Brain During Trauma?

When you go through a traumatic event, your brain switches into “survival mode.” This is controlled by something called the stress response system, which prepares your body to deal with danger. You may have heard of the “fight, flight, or freeze” response. This is when stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline flood your body, helping you react quickly to protect yourself.

This response is helpful in the short term, like when you need to escape danger. But if trauma is ongoing, or if your brain keeps thinking you’re in danger even after the threat is gone, this stress response can do more harm than good.

How Trauma Changes the Brain

Trauma can change how different parts of the brain work and even how they look. Here are the three key areas affected:

1. The Amygdala: The Alarm System

The amygdala is the part of your brain that helps detect threats and process emotions like fear. After trauma, the amygdala can become overactive, making you feel on edge or jumpy even when you’re safe. This is why people who’ve experienced trauma often feel anxious or have trouble calming down.

2. The Prefrontal Cortex: The Decision Maker

The prefrontal cortex is like the brain’s “control center.” It helps you think logically, make decisions, and calm down after a stressful event. Trauma can make this part of the brain less active, which means it’s harder to think clearly, control your emotions, or feel in control of your reactions.

3. The Hippocampus: The Memory Keeper

The hippocampus is responsible for organizing memories and distinguishing between the past and the present. Trauma can make the hippocampus shrink, which is why some people have trouble remembering details of the trauma or feel like they’re reliving it (flashbacks), even when it’s over.

Why Do These Changes Matter?

The changes in the brain after trauma explain many of the symptoms people experience, such as:

• Flashbacks or nightmares: The brain struggles to tell the difference between past and present, so it feels like the trauma is happening again.

• Anxiety or hypervigilance: The overactive amygdala keeps you constantly on the lookout for danger.

• Difficulty focusing or making decisions: A less active prefrontal cortex makes it harder to think clearly.

These changes also show why trauma doesn’t just “go away” on its own—your brain needs time and support to heal.

Can the Brain Heal After Trauma?

The good news is that the brain is adaptable. This ability to change and heal is called neuroplasticity. With the right support, the brain can recover from the effects of trauma. Here’s how:

1. Therapy: Treatments like trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) can help “rewire” the brain and reduce symptoms.

2. Mindfulness and relaxation techniques: Practices like meditation can help calm the amygdala and strengthen the prefrontal cortex.

3. Exercise: Physical activity can increase the size of the hippocampus and improve mood by releasing feel-good chemicals like endorphins.

Trauma changes the brain, but these changes don’t have to be permanent. Understanding how trauma affects the brain can help us be more compassionate toward ourselves and others who are struggling. With the right tools and support, healing is not only possible—it’s likely.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years experience in the social work field. He currently serves as the executive director in outpatient behavioral health therapist at Southeast Kentucky Behavioral health based out of London Kentucky. He may be reached by phone at 606-657-0532 extension 101 or by email at john@sckybh.com

References

• Shin, L. M., Rauch, S. L., & Pitman, R. K. (2006). Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampal function in PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1071(1), 67-79.

• Bremner, J. D. (2006). Traumatic stress: Effects on the brain. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 445-461.

• van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma.

What is Love Bombing and How to Avoid It
May be an image of 2 people and heart

In relationships, the initial stages are often filled with excitement, attention, and affection. However, there’s a line between genuine affection and manipulative behavior. One tactic that has become increasingly recognized and discussed is “love bombing.” This seemingly harmless form of intense affection can lead to harmful consequences for the individual on the receiving end. Let’s explore what love bombing is, the signs to watch for, and how to avoid falling into its trap.

What is Love Bombing?

Love bombing is a manipulation tactic where an individual overwhelms someone with excessive attention, compliments, and gifts to gain control over them. While the attention can feel flattering and genuine at first, it’s often a strategic ploy to create dependency and quickly escalate the relationship. The person performing the love bombing might shower their target with affection, constant communication, and seemingly sincere gestures, only to later use this bond for control and even emotional abuse.

The term “love bombing” is often associated with narcissistic personalities, as it serves their need for control, admiration, and validation. However, anyone can exhibit love bombing behavior, whether intentionally manipulative or subconsciously driven by their own insecurities.

Signs of Love Bombing

Recognizing love bombing can be challenging, as the behavior can easily be mistaken for genuine interest and passion. However, there are certain red flags that can help you identify it:

  • 1. Overwhelming Affection Too Quickly: In the early stages of a relationship, love bombers often express intense feelings of love and commitment. They may talk about your future together, use words like “soulmate,” or declare love within a few days or weeks.
  • 2. Constant Attention and Contact: While frequent communication is normal in budding relationships, love bombers will often take it to an extreme. They may bombard you with texts, calls, and social media messages, making it difficult for you to have personal space.
  • 3. Excessive Gift-Giving: Love bombers often shower their targets with expensive gifts or lavish gestures. While gifts can be a normal part of relationships, this behavior is typically marked by an extreme level of generosity meant to create a sense of obligation and guilt.
  • 4. Isolating You from Others: In an effort to create dependency, a love bomber may attempt to isolate you from friends and family. They might criticize your loved ones, make you feel guilty for spending time away, or frame others as obstacles to your relationship.
  • 5. Quick Escalation of Commitment: A love bomber may push for immediate commitment, such as moving in together or getting married. This is often a tactic to secure control over the relationship before you have time to question or evaluate it.

Why Love Bombing is Harmful

Love bombing can have serious emotional consequences. It often leads to confusion, dependency, and a cycle of highs and lows, as love bombers might suddenly withdraw their affection or exhibit controlling behaviors. This emotional rollercoaster can erode self-esteem and leave individuals feeling trapped and manipulated. Over time, the cycle can lead to more severe emotional or even physical abuse.

How to Avoid Love Bombing

  • 1. Take Your Time: Healthy relationships take time to build. Be cautious of relationships that move too quickly or seem “too good to be true.” If someone is pressuring you to commit or express deep feelings early on, it’s a sign to take a step back.
  • 2. Set Boundaries: Establish and maintain clear boundaries, even if the other person protests. Boundaries are essential for maintaining autonomy and ensuring that both parties are comfortable.
  • 3. Listen to Your Intuition: If something feels off, trust your gut. Love bombing can be intoxicating, but if you sense a lack of authenticity, don’t ignore it. Take note of any discomfort or hesitation, as these feelings often indicate a need to reassess the relationship.
  • 4. Maintain Your Support System: Keep in touch with friends and family and involve them in your relationship decisions. Love bombers often isolate their targets, so maintaining a strong support system can provide you with perspective and objective feedback.
  • 5. Observe Actions Over Time: Genuine affection is consistent and not overwhelming. Pay attention to how the person behaves over time, particularly if they continue to respect your boundaries and support your autonomy as the relationship progresses.
  • 6. Educate Yourself: Understanding manipulative behaviors like love bombing can help you recognize them in the future. By becoming aware of these tactics, you’re less likely to fall into their trap.

Love bombing is a deceptive tactic that may initially appear as passionate love but can ultimately lead to emotional harm. By being aware of the signs, trusting your intuition, and setting boundaries, you can protect yourself from manipulative relationships. Healthy relationships are built on mutual respect, trust, and a balanced exchange of affection. If someone’s behavior feels overwhelming or controlling, it’s okay to step back and re-evaluate the relationship. Remember, real love grows over time and doesn’t need to be forced.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field and is based in London Kentucky through Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. Mr. Collier may be reached by phone at (606) 657–0532 extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com.

References

  • Braiker, H. B. (2001). Who’s Pulling Your Strings? How to Break the Cycle of Manipulation and Regain Control of Your Life. McGraw Hill.
  • Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and Commitment in Romantic Relationships: An Investment Model Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 484-495.
  • Freeman, L. (2018). Manipulative Behavior in Relationships: How to Spot It and Protect Yourself. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com
  • Hammond, C. (2018). The Dangers of Love Bombing: Recognize the Signs. Journal of Personal Relationships and Social Psychology, 75(2), 231-243.
  • Lancer, D. (2017). Dealing with Narcissists: How to Break Free from the Cycle of Manipulation and Abuse. Hazelden Publishing.
  • Stosny, S. (2019). Emotional Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com