Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Tag Companionship

When Loneliness Tricks You Into Going Back

Learning the Difference Between Missing Someone and Missing Connection

Article 6: Part of the Healing After Heartbreak Series

It Usually Happens at Night

The house is quiet. Dinner is over. The television is on, but you’re not really watching it. You glance at your phone. You wonder what they’re doing. Then a familiar thought slips into your mind.

“Maybe I should just text them.”

You don’t necessarily believe getting back together is the right decision. In fact, you’ve probably reminded yourself many times why the relationship ended. Yet in this moment, none of that seems to matter.

You don’t miss the arguments. You don’t miss the disappointment. You don’t even miss the stress. You simply don’t want to feel alone. That is one of the greatest emotional traps after heartbreak. Loneliness has a way of disguising itself as love.

Loneliness Can Sound Like Love

After a relationship ends, many people assume that every longing they feel is evidence that they still belong together. Sometimes that’s true. Often, it isn’t. Loneliness and love are two very different experiences, but they can feel remarkably similar. Love says, “I care deeply about this person and want what is best for both of us.” Loneliness says, “I don’t want to feel this empty anymore.”

The problem is that emotional pain makes those two voices difficult to separate.

Research has consistently shown that loneliness affects both emotional and physical well-being. It can increase stress, heighten anxiety, and even change the way we interpret situations, making unhealthy relationships seem more appealing simply because they feel familiar (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008).

When we are lonely, we are often searching for relief—not necessarily for the healthiest relationship.

Your Brain Prefers Familiar Pain

There is an old saying that people sometimes choose familiar pain over unfamiliar peace. There is more truth in that than many realize. The human brain likes predictability. Even when a relationship was unhealthy, it was familiar. You knew how the conversations would go. You knew their habits, their routines, and even their flaws.

Life after a breakup is uncertain. Uncertainty feels uncomfortable. Sometimes the mind begins to romanticize the past simply because it feels safer than the unknown future. That doesn’t mean the relationship was healthy. It simply means it was familiar.

A Story That Happens Every Day

Jason had been divorced for almost eight months. During the day, he stayed busy with work. He exercised, spent time with friends, and was beginning to feel hopeful again. Then weekends arrived. Saturday mornings were the hardest. For years, he and his wife had eaten breakfast together before deciding what to do with the day. Now he sat alone with a cup of coffee, scrolling through his phone.

One Saturday he nearly called her. Not because he believed the marriage could be repaired. Not because he had forgotten why they divorced. He simply didn’t want to eat breakfast alone. Fortunately, he recognized what was happening. Instead of making the call, he invited his brother to breakfast. That simple decision didn’t erase his loneliness. But it prevented loneliness from making a decision his wisdom would later regret.

Missing Connection Is Part of Being Human

We were created for connection. Healthy relationships provide comfort, encouragement, companionship, and belonging. When those relationships end, there is naturally an empty space. The mistake many people make is believing the only person who can fill that space is the one who left. Healing often begins when we realize that connection can come from many places. A meaningful conversation with a friend.

  • Dinner with family.
  • Volunteering in the community.
  • Joining a support group.
  • Serving at church.
  • Building new friendships.

None of these relationships replace the one that ended. They simply remind us that life is still full of people capable of caring about us.

Ask Yourself One Honest Question

The next time you feel an overwhelming urge to contact your former partner, pause for a moment. Instead of immediately reaching for your phone, ask yourself:

“Do I miss this person…or do I simply miss not being alone?”

That question isn’t meant to shame you. It’s meant to bring clarity. Sometimes the answer will surprise you. Many people discover they are grieving companionship more than compatibility. There is an important difference. Companionship can be rebuilt. Compatibility cannot be forced.

Therapist’s Note

Loneliness is a feeling. It is not a direction. Feelings deserve to be acknowledged, but they do not always deserve to make our decisions. Some of the healthiest choices you will ever make are the ones you make while your emotions are still catching up.

A Healing Exercise: Build a Connection Plan

Instead of creating a list of reasons not to contact your former partner, create a plan for reconnecting with life.

Take out a journal and write the names of five people you trust. They might be family members, close friends, coworkers, or people from church or your community. Beside each name, write one simple way you could reconnect with them during the next two weeks. It might be inviting someone to lunch, making a phone call, taking a walk together, or simply sending a message asking how they are doing.

Next, write down three activities that help you feel connected to yourself. Perhaps it’s hiking, reading, woodworking, painting, exercising, gardening, or attending a Bible study. These aren’t distractions from your pain. They are reminders that your identity is larger than one relationship.

Finally, ask yourself this question:

“What kind of life am I trying to build, even while I am healing?”

That question shifts your focus from what you’ve lost to what you are creating.

Final Thoughts

There will be days when loneliness whispers that the quickest way to feel better is to go backward. Don’t confuse relief with healing. Relief is temporary. Healing is lasting. The goal isn’t simply to stop feeling lonely. The goal is to build a life so rich with purpose, healthy relationships, faith, and hope that loneliness no longer gets to decide where you go next. One day you will notice that you no longer reach for your phone every evening. Not because you’ve forgotten. But because your life has quietly become full again. And that fullness won’t come from returning to the past. It will come from continuing to walk toward the future.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in the behavioral health field, he has worked with individuals, couples, families, and communities facing some of life’s most difficult challenges.

His clinical expertise includes trauma, grief, anxiety, depression, relationship issues, and life transitions. John believes that healing happens when people feel seen, heard, and supported with compassion and respect. He is passionate about translating psychological research into practical tools that empower people to understand their emotions, strengthen their relationships, and build healthier, more meaningful lives.

As a therapist, speaker, and writer, John’s goal is simple: to offer hope, guidance, and practical solutions for real-life struggles. He lives in Southeast Kentucky and is deeply committed to serving his community.

References

Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. W. W. Norton & Company.

Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218–227.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Love, Loss, and the Space Between: Stop Avoiding Pain and Start Living Your Life. Hay House.

Series Reminder

Healing doesn’t mean forgetting. It means carrying yesterday without letting it steal tomorrow.

Going All In: The Hidden Risks of Rushing Into a Relationship

There is something undeniably romantic about the phrase “going all in.” Movies celebrate it. Love songs glorify it. Friends often admire people who seem fearless enough to dive headfirst into love. We are told that real love requires vulnerability, commitment, and complete investment.

While commitment is essential for a healthy relationship, there is an important distinction between healthy commitment and premature emotional investment. One is built on knowledge, trust, and experience. The other is often built on hope, attraction, and assumptions.

Many relationships don’t fail because two people were incompatible. They fail because they became emotionally committed long before they truly knew one another.

The Difference Between Attraction and Knowledge

Attraction happens quickly. Knowledge takes time. During the first weeks or months of dating, we naturally see the best version of another person. Psychologists sometimes refer to this as the honeymoon phase, where the brain is flooded with dopamine, oxytocin, and other neurochemicals that create excitement, optimism, and emotional attachment (Fisher, 2004). Unfortunately, these same chemicals can reduce our ability to evaluate a relationship objectively.

When people “go all in” too quickly, they often mistake:

  • Chemistry for compatibility
  • Passion for stability
  • Attention for commitment
  • Potential for reality

Those are not the same things.

We Fall in Love With Who We Think They Are

One of the greatest dangers of rushing a relationship is that we begin filling in the blanks ourselves. Instead of learning who someone truly is, we imagine who they could become. We overlook inconsistencies. We excuse red flags.

We create explanations for behaviors we don’t fully understand. Psychologists call this idealization—seeing another person through the lens of hope rather than reality (Murray, Holmes, & Griffin, 1996). The problem is that relationships are built on reality, not imagination. Eventually, every relationship moves from fantasy to reality. When that happens, many people don’t feel like their partner changed. Instead, they finally see what was there all along.

Emotional Investment Changes Your Judgment

Imagine buying a house. Would you purchase it after walking through the front door for five minutes? Probably not. You would inspect the foundation. Look at the roof. Check for water damage. Review the neighborhood. Ask difficult questions. Relationships deserve at least that much careful consideration. Yet emotionally, many people commit after only a handful of exciting conversations. Once we become emotionally invested, our brains begin protecting that investment.

Instead of asking, “Is this the right person?”

we begin asking, “How can I make this work?”

Those are completely different questions.

The Cost of Ignoring Red Flags

Red flags rarely appear as dramatic warning signs. Most begin as small moments. Perhaps they become irritated when they don’t get their way. Maybe they avoid accountability. Perhaps they speak disrespectfully about former partners. Maybe they struggle with honesty. Perhaps they become controlling in subtle ways. Someone who rushes into commitment often dismisses these concerns because the emotional reward feels greater than the potential risk. Unfortunately, ignored patterns rarely disappear. They usually become stronger. Dating is not primarily about convincing someone to stay. It is about discovering whether staying would be wise.

Love Needs Observation

Healthy relationships require curiosity. Observe how someone handles disappointment. Observe how they manage stress. Observe how they treat people who have nothing to offer them. Observe how they speak about family. Observe whether their words consistently match their actions. Character reveals itself over time. No conversation can replace experience. No promise can replace consistency. No chemistry can replace integrity.

Why Slow Relationships Often Last Longer

Research consistently suggests that relationships built gradually often develop stronger foundations because trust is earned rather than assumed (Stanley, Rhoades, & Markman, 2006). People sometimes fear moving slowly because they worry someone else will “take” the person they’re dating. Ironically, healthy people generally respect appropriate pacing. Individuals who pressure immediate commitment often reveal more about their own insecurity than about their love. Real intimacy grows. It cannot be rushed.

The Difference Between Commitment and Surrender

Healthy commitment says: “I’m choosing you because I know who you are.”

Unhealthy surrender says: “I’m choosing you because I hope you’ll become who I need.”

One is based on evidence. The other is based on emotion. One grows stronger over time. The other becomes increasingly fragile.

Questions Worth Asking Yourself

Before going “all in,” consider asking yourself:

  • What do I actually know about this person’s character?
  • Have I seen them during conflict?
  • How do they respond when they don’t get what they want?
  • Do their actions consistently match their words?
  • Am I attracted to who they are today or who I hope they’ll become?
  • If nothing about this person ever changed, would I still choose this relationship five years from now?

These questions may not feel romantic, but they are deeply loving—because they protect both people from building a relationship on unrealistic expectations.

A Better Way to Love

Moving slowly does not mean loving less. It means loving wisely. Healthy relationships are not races.

They are discoveries. Every shared experience reveals another layer of a person’s character. Trust is built 0through repeated consistency. Respect grows through mutual understanding. Love deepens through truth rather than fantasy.

Going “all in” is admirable when it follows genuine knowledge of another person. Going all in before you truly know someone is less an act of courage than a gamble. The strongest relationships are rarely built by those who rushed toward commitment. They are built by two people who allowed time to reveal character, chose honesty over fantasy, and discovered that lasting love is not found by moving faster—it is found by building a foundation strong enough to support a lifetime.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a licensed clinical social worker, therapist, author, and educator with extensive experience helping individuals, couples, and families navigate relationship challenges, anxiety, trauma, and emotional well-being. Throughout his career, he has worked with people from diverse backgrounds, combining evidence-based psychological principles with practical, real-world applications that readers can immediately apply to their daily lives.

John’s writing bridges the gap between academic research and everyday experience, making complex psychological concepts understandable and useful. His work emphasizes emotional maturity, healthy communication, personal responsibility, and building relationships founded on trust, authenticity, and mutual respect. Whether writing about mental health, family dynamics, leadership, or personal growth, his goal is to provide readers with insights that encourage lasting change and healthier, more meaningful lives.

References

Fisher, H. (2004). Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Henry Holt.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55(4), 499–509.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (Revised ed.). Harmony Books.

Are Men Loved Unconditionally? A Balanced Examination of Love, Expectations, and Human Relationships

The statement “men are not loved unconditionally” has gained significant attention in conversations about masculinity, relationships, and emotional health. Many men report feeling valued primarily for what they provide—financial security, emotional stability, protection, problem-solving, or status. At the same time, critics of this viewpoint argue that both men and women experience conditions in relationships and that healthy love is inherently reciprocal rather than unconditional. The truth likely exists somewhere between these extremes. Understanding this issue requires examining psychology, sociology, attachment theory, and cultural expectations surrounding gender.

Understanding Conditional vs. Unconditional Love

Unconditional love refers to caring for another person without requiring them to meet certain standards or expectations to receive affection or acceptance. It is often described in parent-child relationships, particularly between caregivers and infants, where love is ideally offered regardless of performance or achievement (Bowlby, 1988). In adult romantic relationships, however, unconditional love becomes more complex.

Most healthy adult relationships include some level of conditionality. People generally expect mutual respect, trust, emotional availability, faithfulness, and effort. A spouse who becomes abusive, chronically dishonest, or emotionally unavailable may find that love alone is insufficient to sustain the relationship. In this sense, romantic love is often conditional for both men and women because relationships involve boundaries and reciprocal investment (Gottman & Silver, 2015).

However, the question many men ask is not whether relationships have expectations, but whether men are uniquely valued for utility rather than emotional existence.

Why Many Men Feel Loved Conditionally

Many men report feeling that affection and admiration are tied to what they can do rather than who they are. Research suggests men often experience social pressure to fulfill traditional masculine roles such as provider, protector, leader, and emotional stabilizer (Mahalik et al., 2003). These expectations can create the perception that love and respect are dependent on performance.

For example, studies have shown that financial instability and unemployment can affect men’s relationship satisfaction and even marital stability more significantly than women’s in some contexts (Bertrand, Kamenica, & Pan, 2015). Men frequently report internalizing the belief that they must remain strong, productive, and emotionally composed in order to maintain attractiveness or value within relationships.

Socialization may also contribute to this perception. Boys are often encouraged to suppress vulnerable emotions with messages such as “man up,” “don’t cry,” or “be strong.” Over time, this can create emotional isolation and reinforce the idea that their struggles are tolerated only when they do not interfere with functioning (Levant, 2011). As a result, some men may feel emotionally supported only when they are successful or useful.

Psychologist Ronald Levant’s work on traditional masculinity highlights how restrictive emotional norms can lead men to feel disconnected from emotional intimacy, increasing depression, loneliness, and relational dissatisfaction (Levant & Richmond, 2007).

The Counterargument: Love Is Conditional for Everyone

While many men feel conditionally loved, researchers caution against oversimplifying the issue. Women also frequently report pressures tied to appearance, nurturing ability, emotional labor, and caregiving expectations. Many women experience fears of being valued primarily for youth, beauty, or emotional caregiving (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997).

From a psychological perspective, romantic love generally involves mutual expectations because partnerships require cooperation. Healthy relationships are not typically unconditional in the way parental love ideally aspires to be. Rather, they are based on what researchers describe as secure attachment, where both partners consistently demonstrate trust, responsiveness, and emotional safety (Johnson, 2019).

In securely attached relationships, individuals are valued not merely for what they contribute but for who they are as people. Partners may experience seasons of unemployment, illness, grief, emotional struggle, or personal failure while still receiving love and support. This suggests that although adult love may contain conditions related to behavior and safety, it does not necessarily depend solely on performance or utility.

Additionally, some scholars argue that men may underreport emotional support due to cultural norms discouraging emotional awareness or vulnerability. Because men are less likely to seek emotional connection openly, they may unintentionally miss opportunities for deeper relational intimacy (Addis & Mahalik, 2003).

A More Accurate Question

Perhaps the better question is not “Are men loved unconditionally?” but rather “Do men feel emotionally safe enough to experience love fully?”

Many men long to be accepted during moments of weakness, grief, failure, fear, or uncertainty. They want reassurance that they are valued beyond achievement, income, or strength. Likewise, many women desire to be valued beyond appearance, caregiving, or emotional support. In this way, the human longing may be more universal than gender-specific.

Healthy love often exists somewhere between unconditional acceptance and reasonable expectations. Love may not be unconditional in the literal sense, but it can be deeply compassionate, forgiving, and enduring. Healthy relationships involve mutual grace—where both people are allowed to be imperfect without fearing abandonment at every failure.

Conclusion

The belief that men are not loved unconditionally reflects a real emotional experience for many men, especially those who have felt valued mainly for provision, protection, or performance. Research supports the idea that traditional masculine expectations can contribute to feelings of conditional worth and emotional isolation. However, evidence also suggests that romantic relationships are naturally reciprocal and contain expectations for both genders.

Rather than viewing love as entirely conditional or unconditional, a healthier perspective may recognize that strong relationships thrive when people are valued for both who they are and how they contribute. Men, like women, benefit most from relationships where vulnerability is safe, effort is appreciated, and love persists through hardship—not because someone is perfect, but because they are deeply known.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a licensed clinical social worker and behavioral health professional with experience helping individuals and families navigate relationships, emotional healing, trauma, communication, and personal growth. His work emphasizes practical insight, emotional honesty, and strengthening healthy interpersonal connections.

References

Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5–14.

Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571–614.

Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206.

Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony Books.

Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment theory in practice: Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) with individuals, couples, and families. Guilford Press.

Levant, R. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm. American Psychologist, 66(8), 765–776.

Levant, R. F., & Richmond, K. (2007). A review of research on masculinity ideologies. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(3), 130–140.

When a Man Just Needs Peace

For many men, the world outside the home can feel like a battlefield. Responsibilities pile up—work, financial pressures, expectations to provide, protect, and persevere. Society often tells men they must be strong, stoic, and unshakeable. When the day ends and the door closes behind them, many men carry the invisible weight of those expectations with them.

In the quiet moments, what some men long for most is not applause, advice, or another task. What they want is something far simpler and far more human: peace. They want a place where they can sit down, lay their head on the chest or lap of the woman they love, and simply breathe. A place where the noise of the world fades away and they can feel safe enough to just exist for a moment.

Yet in modern relationships, many men report that this sense of emotional refuge is becoming harder to find.

The Hidden Exhaustion Men Carry

Research consistently shows that men are less likely to openly express emotional distress than women due to social expectations around masculinity. Psychologist Ronald Levant, known for his work on male emotional socialization, describes how boys are often taught early in life to suppress vulnerability and emotional needs (Levant & Richmond, 2007).

By adulthood, many men have internalized the belief that their role is to endure stress silently.

They work long hours.

They carry financial burdens.

They solve problems without complaint.

They try to be the steady pillar everyone else leans on.

But even pillars crack under enough pressure.

Behind the quiet exterior, many men feel emotionally exhausted. When they come home, they are not necessarily looking for solutions—they have spent all day solving problems. What they crave instead is emotional safety.

The Comfort of Quiet Presence

Attachment theory suggests that healthy relationships provide a secure base—a place where individuals feel safe, accepted, and emotionally supported (Bowlby, 1988). While this principle is often discussed in relation to children, it applies equally to adults.

For a man, that secure base may look like something very simple:

Sitting beside the woman he loves.

Feeling her hand on his shoulder.

Resting his head in her lap after a long day.

Being able to close his eyes without having to defend himself, explain himself, or fix something else.

It is not weakness.

It is regulation.

Research on physical touch shows that comforting contact—such as hugging or resting close to a partner—can reduce cortisol (stress hormones) and increase oxytocin, the hormone associated with bonding and calmness (Field, 2010).

In other words, that quiet moment in her arms can literally help a man’s nervous system reset.

When Peace Turns Into Pressure

Unfortunately, some men describe the opposite experience. Instead of peace, they encounter another layer of pressure when they come home.

The conversation immediately becomes about:

More problems to solve

More expectations to meet

More criticisms about what hasn’t been done

More reminders that something is still lacking

Over time, this can create emotional fatigue inside the relationship itself.

Psychologist Dr. John Gottman, known for decades of relationship research, found that constant criticism and negative interaction patterns are among the strongest predictors of relationship dissatisfaction and divorce (Gottman & Silver, 2015).

When a man feels that nothing he does is ever enough, he may stop sharing altogether. Instead of seeking comfort, he withdraws emotionally.

Not because he does not care.

But because he no longer feels safe being vulnerable.

The Shame Around Male Vulnerability

One of the most damaging messages men often receive is the idea that wanting comfort somehow makes them weak.

Phrases like:

“Man up.”

“Get over it.”

“Stop being soft.”

send a powerful message that emotional needs are unacceptable.

Yet modern psychological research strongly contradicts this narrative. Emotional intimacy is one of the strongest predictors of relationship satisfaction for both partners (Reis & Shaver, 1988).

Men need connection just as deeply as women do.

They simply tend to express that need differently.

For many men, connection is not always about long conversations or emotional processing. Sometimes it is about shared silence, physical closeness, and emotional reassurance.

A quiet moment together can say more than a thousand words.

Why Some Men Choose Solitude Instead

Because of these experiences, some men become reluctant to pursue relationships at all.

If the relationship becomes another place where they feel criticized, judged, or emotionally unsafe, many men begin to ask themselves a difficult question:

Is it easier to struggle alone than to carry the stress of a relationship that offers no peace?

This does not mean men do not desire companionship.

In fact, studies consistently show that men benefit greatly from committed relationships in terms of mental health and longevity (Umberson & Montez, 2010).

But the key factor is relationship quality.

A relationship should not feel like another battlefield.

It should feel like home.

Becoming Each Other’s Peace

Healthy relationships work best when both partners become a source of calm for one another.

Women often want emotional reassurance, listening, and validation.

Men often want physical closeness, acceptance, and a place to rest emotionally.

Neither need is wrong.

Both are human.

When couples learn to recognize and honor each other’s emotional languages, something powerful happens. The relationship stops being a place of pressure and becomes a place of restoration.

The strongest couples are not those who never struggle.

They are the ones who can look at each other after a long day and silently say:

“You’re safe here.”

Conclusion

A man who comes home and lays his head in the lap of the woman he loves is not weak.

He is not less masculine.

He is simply human.

In a world that constantly demands strength, productivity, and resilience from men, the quiet comfort of a loving partner can become one of the most powerful forms of healing.

Sometimes the greatest gift a woman can give the man she loves is not advice, correction, or another expectation.

Sometimes the greatest gift is simply peace.

A quiet moment.

A gentle touch.

And the unspoken assurance that for a little while, the weight of the world can rest somewhere else.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a behavioral health therapist and writer from Kentucky who focuses on relationships, emotional healing, and personal growth. Through his clinical experience and writing, he explores the complex emotional dynamics between men and women and seeks to help individuals develop healthier, more compassionate relationships.

References

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

Field, T. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30(4), 367–383.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.

Levant, R. F., & Richmond, K. (2007). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(2), 130–146.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Handbook of Personal Relationships. Wiley.

Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(Suppl), S54–S66.