Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Tag growth

Listening to Understand, Not to Win

Many couples argue because they are trying to win, not because they don’t care. When people listen just to prove their point, conversations turn into fights. When people listen to understand, conversations turn into chances to grow closer.

Listening to understand means you are trying to truly hear what your partner feels and needs—even if you do not fully agree. This kind of listening builds trust, safety, and connection in marriage.

Listening to Win vs. Listening to Understand

Listening to Win

When someone listens to win, they are:

  • planning what to say next
  • defending themselves
  • trying to prove they are right
  • pointing out mistakes

This makes the other person feel unheard and unsafe. When people feel unsafe, they shut down or fight back.

Listening to Understand

When someone listens to understand, they are:

  • focused on the other person
  • trying to understand feelings
  • asking questions instead of accusing
  • showing care and respect

Research shows that feeling understood lowers anger and helps couples solve problems together (Gottman Institute, n.d.).

Why Feeling Heard Matters So Much

When your partner feels heard, their body and brain calm down. They are more open to problem-solving. Studies on active listening show that people communicate better when they feel emotionally understood, not judged (Rogers & Farson, 1957).

You do not have to agree to show understanding. You only have to show that you are trying to understand.

A Helpful Rule: Understand First, Respond Later

A simple rule for couples is this:

Do not argue with something you do not fully understand yet.

Before responding, try to explain your partner’s point in your own words. This shows effort and care.

Example:

  • “What I hear you saying is that you felt ignored when I didn’t respond.”
  • “It sounds like that really hurt you.”

This approach reduces defensiveness and keeps conversations respectful (Gottman Institute, n.d.).

5 Simple Skills for Listening to Understand

1. Give Full Attention

Put down your phone. Look at your partner. Show that they matter.

2. Don’t Interrupt

Let your partner finish speaking. Interrupting sends the message that their feelings don’t matter.

3. Repeat What You Heard

Say:

  • “So you’re saying…”
    This helps prevent misunderstandings.

4. Name the Feeling

Try:

  • “It sounds like you felt frustrated.”
    This helps your partner feel seen.

5. Ask If You Got It Right

End with:

  • “Did I understand that correctly?”
    This turns the conversation into teamwork.

These steps are core parts of active listening and emotional connection (StatPearls, 2023).

A Simple Script Couples Can Use

Partner A:
“I feel hurt when this happens.”

Partner B:
“What I hear is that you felt hurt because ____. Did I get that right?”

Partner A:
“Yes” or “Almost—here’s what I mean…”

Partner B:
“Thank you for explaining. Tell me more.”

This small change can completely shift the tone of a conversation.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Trying to fix the problem too fast
  • Saying “yes, but…”
  • Correcting small details instead of focusing on feelings
  • Getting defensive right away

When emotions are high, understanding must come before solutions.

Conclusion

Listening to understand, not to win, changes marriages. It creates safety. It builds trust. It helps couples feel like partners instead of opponents.

When both people feel heard, even hard conversations become moments of connection.

Reframes for Couples

Use these simple reframes during conflict:

  • ❌ “You’re wrong.”
    ✅ “Help me understand your point.”
  • ❌ “You’re overreacting.”
    ✅ “I see this really matters to you.”
  • ❌ “Here’s why I did that.”
    ✅ “I want to understand how that affected you.”
  • ❌ “You always…”
    ✅ “When this happens, it feels…”
  • ❌ “I need to defend myself.”
    ✅ “I need to listen first.”

Strong marriages are not built on being right.
They are built on being present, patient, and willing to understand.

This article was written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S. He is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and behavioral health professional with extensive experience working with individuals, couples, and families. He specializes in relationship dynamics, emotional regulation, trauma-informed care, and communication patterns that impact long-term connection. John is known for blending clinical insight with practical, real-life guidance that helps couples move from conflict toward understanding, safety, and emotional growth. His work focuses on helping people build healthier relationships through empathy, accountability, and intentional communication.

Reflective Questions

  1. Do I listen to understand or to respond?
  2. What helps me feel heard by my partner?
  3. What habits do I have that shut conversations down?
  4. How do I react when I feel misunderstood?
  5. What would change if I focused more on understanding than winning?

References

When Kids Aren’t the “Center” — But Belong in a Strong Family

Many modern parenting philosophies promote a child-centered home — one in which children’s preferences, needs, and schedules shape family life. But emerging insights from psychology and family systems research suggest this approach often places undue pressure on parents and can unintentionally undermine family health and child development.

The popular social media observation that “a child-centered home doesn’t create happier kids — it creates exhausted parents and disconnected marriages” resonates with deeper research themes about family functioning and well-being. 

1. The Limits of Putting Children at the Center

Child-centered parenting often places the child’s needs above all others in daily decision-making and family priorities. While this approach grows from a desire to nurture and protect, critics argue it can slide into over-indulgence and conflict:

Psychology Today notes that highly child-centered parenting can “run the risk of producing entitled, narcissistic children” and higher conflict in the home because parental limits and structure are minimized in favor of child preference.  Rather than fostering secure independence, over-prioritizing the child’s wants can make routine parenting tasks — like chores, bedtime, or discipline — points of escalating frustration for both sides.

This dynamic often drains parents’ emotional and physical resources, contributing to parenting burnout — a researched phenomenon linked to chronic stress and strained parent­–child relationships. 

2. Children Thrive Within a Strong Family System

Instead of centering children above all else, family systems theory emphasizes balance: each member has a role, and the system functions healthiest when boundaries, mutual support, and interconnected relationships work well together. In healthy families:

Children feel secure belonging in the system rather than being its focus. This fosters autonomy, confidence, and emotional regulation. Quality of parental relationships, especially between caregivers, strongly predicts children’s social and emotional competence. Research shows that harmonious couple interactions contribute to better child outcomes, while conflict or parent exhaustion can spill over and affect child development. 

The idea of enmeshment — where family roles blur and individual boundaries erode — also illustrates how child-centrism can backfire. In enmeshed families, a child’s identity becomes intertwined with parental needs and anxieties, limiting both parent and child growth. 

3. When Marriages Suffer, Kids Also Feel the Impact

Importantly, research shows that marital quality is not just “between adults” — it affects children deeply. Studies using family systems models reveal that positive couple relationships correlate with fewer behavioral issues and stronger emotional adjustment in children. 

In contrast, when a marriage becomes strained because parents are exhausted or focused primarily on pleasing children, children may actually experience less stability and higher emotional tension at home — conditions that research associates with poorer adjustment over time. 

4. Belonging Over Centrality

Some contemporary voices in parenting psychology propose moving from a child-centric model to one of family-centered belonging. In this view:

Children benefit most when the entire family unit thrives, including parental well-being and marital health.  Happiness and emotional security for children come not from being the focus of attention, but from predictable boundaries, parental stability, and loving relationships between family adults.

A balanced family environment supports both children’s needs and parents’ well-being — a combination that research repeatedly links with better long-term emotional development in kids.

References

A child-centered home doesn’t create happier kids — it creates exhausted parents and disconnected marriages. (Social media post highlighting popular perspective).  Leff, J. S. & Goldberg, J. (2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior — stable two-parent families show better child outcomes linked to positive couple interactions.  The Failure of Child-Centered Parenting. Psychology Today: Child-centered styles may increase conflict and entitlement risks.  Liang, J. & Chen, Z. (2025). Parents’ work–family conflict and parent–child relationship — parenting burnout can harm family bonds.  Tang, Y. (2023). Study on mother-father relationships and social-emotional competence — marital support positively influences children’s development.  Enmeshment. Psychology concept describing boundary issues when family roles become intertwined.  Nelson, J. A. (2009). Family stress and parental responses to children — parent fatigue affects responsiveness.  Reddit discussion on decentering children for family health. 

I Can’t stand being told “No”: How to Accept “No” as an Answer from Your Parents

Hearing “no” from your parents can be frustrating, especially when you feel like their decision is unfair or unnecessary. However, learning how to accept “no” as an answer is an important life skill that helps build self-control, patience, and resilience. Understanding why parents say “no” and developing strategies to handle it maturely can improve your relationship with them and help you navigate life’s challenges more effectively.

Why Do Parents Say “No”?

Your parents’ job is to guide and protect you, which means they sometimes have to set limits. Research shows that parental boundaries help teens develop better decision-making skills and prevent impulsive behaviors (Baumrind, 1991). Some common reasons parents say “no” include:

  • Safety Concerns – They want to protect you from harm.
  • Financial Reasons – Some requests may be too expensive.
  • Time Management – They may want you to focus on school, sleep, or family time.
  • Moral or Ethical Concerns – They may be trying to instill values in you.

While it might feel unfair in the moment, their decisions are often made with your best interests in mind.

How to Accept “No” Without Getting Upset

1. Take a Deep Breath and Stay Calm

Reacting with anger or frustration can escalate the situation. Instead, take a moment to breathe and collect your thoughts. Studies on emotional regulation suggest that deep breathing can help reduce stress and improve self-control (Gross, 1998).

2. Listen to Their Explanation

Rather than immediately arguing, listen to your parents’ reasoning. Even if you disagree, understanding their perspective shows maturity and respect. Research on family communication highlights that active listening improves relationships and problem-solving (Smetana, 2011).

3. Ask Questions Respectfully

If you don’t understand why they said no, ask calmly:

  • “Can you help me understand why this isn’t a good idea?”
  • “Is there a way I can prove I’m responsible enough?”

This approach shows that you respect their decision while seeking clarity.

4. Accept Their Decision Without Arguing

Sometimes, your parents’ answer won’t change no matter what. Instead of continuing to argue, acknowledge their response and move on. Constant arguing can lead to unnecessary conflict and resentment (Grusec & Goodnow, 1994).

5. Find an Alternative or Compromise

If their decision affects something important to you, try proposing a compromise. For example:

  • If they say no to going out late, suggest coming home earlier.
  • If they say no to buying something expensive, offer to contribute your own money.

Finding a middle ground can show your responsibility and willingness to cooperate.

6. Remember That “No” is Not Personal

It’s easy to feel like a “no” means your parents don’t trust or care about you, but that’s not the case. Their decisions are often based on experience and concern for your well-being. Studies show that teens who perceive parental rules as caring rather than controlling develop healthier independence (Deci & Ryan, 1985).

7. Focus on the Bigger Picture

In the moment, getting a “no” may feel like the end of the world, but ask yourself:

  • Will this still matter a week from now?
  • Is this decision really unfair, or just disappointing?

Practicing perspective-taking helps you handle setbacks in a more balanced way (Hoffman, 2000).

Accepting “no” as an answer from your parents is tough, but it’s a valuable skill that will benefit you throughout life. Learning to stay calm, listen, and respond respectfully helps build stronger relationships, develop patience, and prove your maturity. Even when you don’t agree with their decision, handling it well can lead to more trust and independence in the future.

This article has been written by John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S. Mr. Collier has over 25 years of experience in the Socia Work field. He currently serves as the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC based out of London Kentucky. He may be reached at (606) 657-0532 or by email at john@sekybh.com.

References

  • Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
  • Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4-19.
  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Wiley.
What is a Situationship? Exploring the Pros and Cons

In modern relationship dynamics, the term “situationship” has become increasingly popular. Though not officially recognized in traditional psychological or sociological terms, a situationship is generally defined as a romantic or sexual relationship that exists without clear, established boundaries or long-term commitment. Unlike casual dating, situationships often involve a level of emotional connection that blurs the lines between a formal relationship and something more casual.

A situationship typically arises when two individuals engage in a relationship-like dynamic without defining their intentions. Unlike a committed relationship, a situationship often lacks labels and exclusivity. It can involve spending time together, sharing emotional intimacy, or even acting like a couple in public, but without the explicit commitment of being “official.”

Characteristics of a Situationship

  • Lack of Definition: Neither party defines the relationship.
  • Inconsistent Communication: There may be regular interaction at times, followed by periods of distance.
  • Emotional Ambiguity: Both individuals may feel uncertain about where they stand.
  • Physical Intimacy Without Exclusivity: Sexual involvement may occur without an agreement to be monogamous.

The Pros of a Situationship

  1. Flexibility and Freedom: A situationship allows individuals to explore a connection without the pressures of long-term commitment. For those focusing on careers, education, or personal growth, it can provide companionship without demanding a structured relationship.
    • Source: Kaplan, H. (2020). “Modern Relationship Dynamics.” Journal of Social Psychology.
  2. Low Pressure: Situationships often lack the formal expectations tied to traditional relationships, reducing stress related to meeting familial or societal norms.
  3. Exploration of Compatibility: It can serve as a testing ground to evaluate compatibility before entering a committed relationship.
  4. Autonomy: Both individuals retain their independence, allowing for personal freedom and decision-making.

The Cons of a Situationship

  1. Emotional Uncertainty: The lack of clarity can lead to confusion, anxiety, or unmet expectations. People involved in situationships often report feelings of insecurity about the other person’s intentions.
    • Source: Miller, R. S. (2018). “Emotional Costs of Ambiguous Relationships.” Relationship Studies Quarterly.
  2. Uneven Investment: One party may develop deeper feelings, leading to a mismatch in emotional investment and potential heartbreak.
  3. Lack of Growth: Without clear direction, a situationship may stagnate, leaving individuals in a limbo that prevents them from pursuing more meaningful relationships.
  4. Social Challenges: Explaining a situationship to friends or family can be challenging, often leading to judgment or misunderstanding.

Navigating a Situationship

To navigate a situationship successfully, open communication is essential. Discussing intentions and boundaries early on can help both parties align their expectations. If the relationship becomes unfulfilling or one person desires a more formal commitment, addressing these concerns is crucial to avoid prolonged emotional strain.

A situationship can provide a casual and flexible connection for individuals who are not ready for a formal commitment. However, it carries the risk of emotional ambiguity and unmet expectations. Understanding the pros and cons can help individuals decide whether a situationship aligns with their personal goals and emotional well-being.

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

This article has been written by John S Collier, MSW, LCSW-S. collier has over 25 years of experience in the social work field. he currently serves as the Executive Director and outpatient provider at Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health based out of London Kentucky. He may be reached by phone at (606) 657-0532, extension 101 or by email at john@sekybh.com

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

References

  • Kaplan, H. (2020). “Modern Relationship Dynamics.” Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Miller, R. S. (2018). “Emotional Costs of Ambiguous Relationships.” Relationship Studies Quarterly.
  • Carter, P. (2019). The New Rules of Love: Understanding Modern Relationships. HarperCollins.
  • Johnson, T. A. (2021). “Navigating Emotional Ambiguity in Situationships.” Psychology Today.