Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Tag attachment

The Mercy of Open Hands: Book 3 of 5 in the Expressions Behind His Silence series released.

From author and licensed clinical social worker John S. Collier comes a powerful new series of books exploring love, loss, faith, emotional healing, and personal growth. With honesty shaped by both professional experience and a life marked by hardship, perseverance, and grace, Collier invites readers to examine the hidden places of the heart. Each book blends practical wisdom with vivid metaphor, offering encouragement to those learning to release the past, rebuild their identity, establish healthier relationships, and trust God through uncertain seasons. This is more than a collection of books—it is a journey from merely surviving life’s storms to discovering the strength, purpose, and peace needed to live fully again.

https://a.co/d/0gTmck1t

Expressions from Behind His Silence: Valume 3: Thwe Mercy of Open Hands

Some endings do not arrive with anger. They arrive with open hands.

The Mercy of Open Hands, Volume Three of the Expressions from Behind His Silence series, follows a man through heartbreak, acceptance, forgiveness, and the difficult grace of release.

Through intimate, reflective poetry, John S. Collier explores what it means to love someone without possessing them, to carry grief without becoming bitter, and to let go without denying that the love was real.

These poems speak to the moment when holding on begins to wound more than losing—and to the quiet courage required to choose peace.

This collection is for anyone learning that surrender is not weakness, forgiveness does not erase the past, and sometimes the most loving thing the heart can do is open its hands.

Five Ways to Provide Children Stability While Living Between Two Homes

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW

When parents separate or divorce, one of the most significant changes for children is learning how to live between two homes. A child who once knew exactly where they would wake up each morning, where their belongings were kept, and who would be sitting at the dinner table may suddenly have to adjust to different bedrooms, schedules, expectations, and routines.

For adults, these arrangements may be described in terms of custody schedules, parenting time, visitation, or shared parenting. Children usually experience them much more personally. They may wonder, Where am I sleeping tonight? Did I leave my homework at Dad’s house? Will Mom be upset that I had fun with Dad? Who is picking me up from school? When will I see Mom again?

These questions illustrate an important principle: stability does not necessarily mean living in only one place. Stability means having enough predictability, emotional security, consistency, and dependable relationships that a child knows what to expect and knows that the adults responsible for them are going to continue caring for them.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) emphasizes that children’s adjustment following divorce or separation is influenced significantly by how parents interact before, during, and after the separation. Parents who place children’s needs ahead of their disagreements can make the transition easier. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Although every family is different, the following five strategies can help children develop a sense of security while living between two homes.

1. Create Predictable Routines in Both Homes

Children generally function better when they have some idea of what is going to happen next. Predictability creates a sense of security because children do not have to constantly anticipate changes.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends keeping children’s routines—including school, extracurricular activities, relationships, discipline, and responsibilities—as normal and unchanged as reasonably possible following separation or divorce. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

This does not mean both homes must operate identically.

One parent may serve dinner at 5:30 while the other eats at 6:30. One household may allow television before bed while another prefers reading. Children are capable of understanding that different homes have somewhat different expectations.

However, having consistency around important areas can be helpful.

For example, parents might attempt to maintain reasonably similar expectations concerning:

  • Bedtime and wake-up routines
  • Homework and school attendance
  • Medication and healthcare
  • Personal hygiene
  • Screen time
  • Chores and responsibilities
  • School-night expectations
  • Behavioral boundaries

A predictable parenting schedule can also provide reassurance. A child who knows, “Dad picks me up every Wednesday after school,” experiences something very different from a child who regularly wonders, “I don’t know where I’m going tonight.”

Visual calendars can be especially useful for younger children. Parents can place a calendar somewhere the child can easily see it and use colors, pictures, or symbols to indicate which home the child will be staying in.

Most importantly, parents should make every reasonable effort to keep promises concerning parenting time. HealthyChildren.org specifically notes that predictable weekly or monthly schedules can be comforting and emphasizes the importance of parents following through on promised visits or time together. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Children do not need every day to be identical. They need the important people in their lives to be dependable.

2. Never Make the Child Choose Between Parents

One of the greatest emotional burdens adults can unintentionally place on children is making them feel responsible for choosing one parent over another.

Children generally want permission to love both parents.

A child should not have to evaluate whether talking positively about one parent will hurt the other parent’s feelings. Likewise, children should not become messengers, investigators, negotiators, or referees between adults.

The AAP advises parents not to force children to take sides and recommends keeping disagreements and adult conversations private rather than allowing children to become involved in parental conflict. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Parents should therefore avoid questions or statements such as:

  • “Who would you rather live with?”
  • “Does your dad’s girlfriend stay there?”
  • “Tell your mother she needs to pay me.”
  • “Your father cares more about his new family than you.”
  • “I guess you’d rather be at your mom’s house.”

Even when spoken during frustration, statements like these can create a loyalty conflict. The child may begin believing that loving one parent represents betrayal of the other.

A healthier message is:

“You are allowed to love both of your parents.”

Children should also be able to enjoy themselves in the other household without guilt. If a child returns from the other parent’s home excited about going camping, attending a ballgame, visiting grandparents, or celebrating a birthday, the receiving parent can simply share the child’s excitement.

The message becomes:

“You don’t have to protect my feelings. I’m glad you had a good time.”

That response provides tremendous emotional freedom. Parents do not have to like one another to protect their child’s relationship with each parent. The goal is not necessarily friendship between former partners. The goal is creating an environment in which children are not responsible for managing adult emotions.

3. Make Both Houses Feel Like Home

There is an important difference between visiting a parent and living with a parent. Whenever practical, children who regularly spend substantial time in two households should have a sense that they belong in both places. They should not feel like permanent guests arriving with luggage every few days. Something as simple as having their own toothbrush, pajamas, clothing, school supplies, toys, books, toiletries, and personal belongings can communicate:

“You belong here.”

If circumstances allow, give the child a designated personal space. It does not necessarily have to be a private bedroom. It might be a dresser, shelf, closet, toy box, desk, or special area where the child’s belongings remain when they leave. Allowing children to personalize their space can also increase their sense of ownership.

Let them choose:

  • Bedding
  • Pictures
  • Decorations
  • Stuffed animals
  • Books
  • Nightlights
  • Posters
  • Family photographs

Parents should also consider keeping commonly forgotten necessities in both homes. Children frequently moving clothing, chargers, school supplies, medications, sports equipment, and toiletries from one household to another can become frustrated and anxious.

Whenever financially possible, duplicating inexpensive necessities can reduce this burden. Adults sometimes unintentionally make children responsible for managing the logistics of shared parenting. A seven-year-old should not experience a crisis because they forgot their school shoes at the other parent’s house.

The adults should carry as much of the logistical responsibility as reasonably possible. This principle extends beyond physical belongings. Children need emotional belonging as well. Photographs of the other parent do not necessarily need to disappear from a child’s room simply because the parents are no longer together. Children should generally be allowed to talk about their other home, siblings, stepparents, grandparents, and experiences without feeling that certain subjects are forbidden. Two homes can be very different and still communicate the same fundamental message:

“This is your home, too.”

4. Protect Children From Adult Conflict

Parents do not have to agree about everything to successfully raise a child between two homes. They do, however, need to recognize that repeated exposure to adult conflict can make an already difficult transition significantly harder. AAP guidance recommends that parents discuss disagreements privately, avoid fighting where children can hear them, and refrain from involving children in parental arguments. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

This includes more than face-to-face arguments. Children can also be exposed to conflict through:

  • Angry telephone conversations
  • Hostile text messages they are allowed to see
  • Social-media posts
  • Criticism from extended family members
  • Arguments during exchanges
  • Sarcastic comments
  • Questioning children about the other household
  • Asking children to deliver messages
  • Complaining about child support or finances

One particularly harmful dynamic occurs when the child becomes the communication system between parents.

  • “Tell your dad you’re staying here Friday.”
  • “Ask your mother why she hasn’t answered me.”
  • “Tell Dad you need money for your uniform.”

Children should not be responsible for carrying adult information across household lines.

Whenever possible, adults should communicate directly through phone calls, text messages, email, co-parenting applications, mediators, or other appropriate channels. When communication between parents is extremely difficult, reducing unnecessary interaction may sometimes be more realistic than attempting to create a close co-parenting relationship. The objective should remain the same: reduce the child’s exposure to conflict.

Parents can also make transitions deliberately uneventful. Exchanges do not need to become opportunities to revisit disagreements. A simple: “Have a great weekend. I love you. I’ll see you Monday.” may provide much greater security than an emotional goodbye followed by an argument in the driveway. Children watch adults carefully. When parents communicate that transitions are safe and manageable, children receive permission to experience them that way as well.

5. Give Children Permission to Talk About Their Feelings

A child can love both parents and still dislike living between two homes. Both things can be true. Children may experience sadness, anger, confusion, excitement, guilt, relief, anxiety, or frustration—and sometimes several of those emotions at once.

Younger children may have difficulty explaining these emotions verbally. Their distress may instead appear through tantrums, sleep difficulties, clinginess, regression, irritability, or changes in eating. School-aged children may demonstrate anger, distraction, academic problems, or mood changes. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Rather than immediately correcting the emotion, parents can become curious about it. If a child says:

“I hate going back and forth.”

A parent may instinctively respond:

“You shouldn’t say that. You’re lucky both of us love you.”

Although well intended, that response can close the conversation. A more supportive response might be:

“Going back and forth can be hard sometimes. What is the hardest part for you?”

Perhaps the problem is not the other parent at all. The child might say:

“I always forget my stuff.”

“I miss my dog.”

“I don’t sleep well there.”

“I hate packing.”

“I miss you when I’m gone.”

Now the parent has information that may lead to a practical solution. The AAP recommends giving children opportunities to express their feelings and helping them understand that they did not cause the divorce or separation. Children also benefit from reassurance that their parents’ love and care for them will continue. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠) One of the most powerful messages a parent can repeatedly communicate is: “The problems between the adults are adult problems. You did not cause them, and you are not responsible for fixing them.”

Stability Is More Emotional Than Geographical

Parents sometimes fear that living between two homes automatically means children will have unstable lives. That does not have to be the case. A child’s stability is created through relationships, routines, expectations, emotional safety, and dependable caregiving—not simply through an address. Two homes can provide stability when the adults surrounding the child consistently communicate:

  • “You are safe.”
  • “You are loved.”
  • “You know what happens next.”
  • “You are allowed to love both parents.”
  • “The adults will handle the adult problems.”
  • “You can talk to me about how you feel.”

The transition following separation or divorce is a process rather than a single event, and children’s reactions may change as they grow and understand their family circumstances differently. The American Academy of Pediatrics therefore encourages parents and professionals to remain attentive to children’s emotional and behavioral responses over time. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

Parents should pay particular attention to significant or persistent changes such as declining school performance, social withdrawal, severe anxiety, sleep disturbances, prolonged sadness, aggression, physical complaints without an obvious medical explanation, or other substantial changes in functioning. When concerns become significant, consultation with the child’s pediatrician or an appropriately qualified mental-health professional may be beneficial. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Ultimately, successful shared parenting is not measured by whether two households have identical rules, furniture, resources, or parenting styles. It is measured by whether the child experiences both homes as places where adults are dependable and love does not have to be divided. Children should never feel that they are carrying two separate lives in two separate suitcases. They should be able to understand something much healthier:

“I have one life, one childhood, and two places where I belong.”

References

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Helping children and families deal with divorce and separation. Pediatrics, 138(6), e20163020. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Parting ways: New report on divorce addresses pediatricians’ role. AAP News. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

HealthyChildren.org. (2026). Divorce and separation: How to help your child adjust. American Academy of Pediatrics. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Hetherington, E. M. (2005). Divorce and the adjustment of children. Pediatrics in Review, 26(5), 163–169. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

Trauma Bonding vs. Healthy Bonding: Knowing the Difference Can Change Your Life

Understanding the Difference Between Emotional Attachment and Emotional Safety

Human beings are created for connection. Healthy relationships provide safety, encouragement, and belonging. Unfortunately, not every powerful emotional connection is healthy. Some relationships become rooted in cycles of pain, manipulation, and intermittent affection, creating what mental health professionals refer to as a trauma bond. Because these relationships often contain moments of genuine affection mixed with emotional abuse, they can be difficult to recognize and even more difficult to leave.

Understanding the difference between trauma bonding and healthy bonding is not simply an academic exercise—it can be the first step toward emotional freedom, healing, and healthier relationships.

What Is Trauma Bonding?

Trauma bonding is a psychological attachment that develops between a victim and an abusive or controlling individual through repeated cycles of mistreatment followed by periods of kindness, affection, or reconciliation. These unpredictable cycles strengthen emotional dependence, making the relationship increasingly difficult to leave despite the ongoing harm.

Psychologists Dutton and Painter (1981) first described trauma bonding while studying abusive relationships. They found that intermittent reinforcement—alternating fear with affection—creates unusually powerful emotional attachments, much like unpredictable rewards strengthen addictive behaviors.

Trauma bonding is not evidence of deep love. Rather, it is often the result of survival instincts becoming intertwined with emotional attachment.

Characteristics of Trauma Bonding

A Cycle of Abuse and Relief

The relationship repeatedly moves through periods of conflict, emotional pain, apologies, temporary closeness, and then another episode of abuse. The moments of kindness create hope that “things will be different this time,” keeping the cycle alive.

Emotional Highs and Lows

Trauma bonds often feel incredibly intense. The emotional roller coaster can produce excitement, anxiety, relief, and fear in rapid succession. Over time, these emotional extremes become confused with passion or love.

Self-Blame

Individuals trapped in trauma bonds frequently assume responsibility for the problems within the relationship. They may believe:

  • “If I were more patient…”
  • “If I tried harder…”
  • “If I changed…”

Rather than recognizing abusive behavior, they internalize responsibility for another person’s choices.

Fear, Obligation, and Guilt

Many remain in unhealthy relationships because they feel responsible for the other person’s emotions or believe leaving would make them selfish or disloyal.

Fear may include:

  • Fear of abandonment
  • Fear of retaliation
  • Fear of being alone
  • Fear that no one else will love them

These emotions become powerful psychological chains.

Needs Become Secondary

In trauma bonds, one person’s emotional needs dominate the relationship while the other’s needs are ignored, minimized, or criticized.

Over time, individuals may lose touch with:

  • Their own identity
  • Personal goals
  • Self-esteem
  • Emotional boundaries

Leaving Feels Impossible

One of the defining characteristics of trauma bonding is that leaving often feels emotionally unbearable—even when remaining in the relationship is clearly harmful.

This is not weakness.

It reflects the powerful neurological and psychological effects of chronic stress, attachment, and intermittent reinforcement.

What Is Healthy Bonding?

Healthy bonding develops through consistent experiences of trust, respect, honesty, and emotional safety. Unlike trauma bonding, healthy relationships do not depend upon fear or emotional instability to maintain closeness.

Instead, healthy love provides a secure foundation where both individuals are free to grow.

Healthy bonding encourages emotional security rather than emotional dependency.

Characteristics of Healthy Bonding

Trust

Healthy relationships are built upon reliability and honesty. Each individual feels confident that the other will act with integrity.

Trust grows slowly through consistent actions—not grand promises.

Emotional Stability

Healthy relationships experience disagreements, but they do not rely upon chaos to create closeness.

Partners experience:

  • Calm communication
  • Predictability
  • Emotional consistency
  • Psychological safety

Conflict becomes an opportunity for understanding rather than intimidation.

Mutual Respect

Healthy partners recognize one another as equals.

Both individuals:

  • Listen respectfully
  • Value differing opinions
  • Protect one another’s dignity
  • Encourage healthy independence

Respect is present even during disagreement.

Open Communication

Healthy bonding allows difficult conversations without fear of punishment.

Individuals feel emotionally safe expressing:

  • Needs
  • Concerns
  • Feelings
  • Disappointments
  • Boundaries

Communication becomes a bridge rather than a battlefield.

Healthy Boundaries

Healthy love recognizes that two individuals can remain emotionally connected while maintaining separate identities.

Healthy boundaries include:

  • Respecting personal time
  • Supporting friendships
  • Encouraging hobbies
  • Protecting emotional well-being
  • Accepting the word “no”

Boundaries strengthen relationships rather than weaken them.

Growth and Healing

Healthy relationships inspire people to become better versions of themselves.

Partners celebrate one another’s:

  • Successes
  • Personal development
  • Healing
  • Independence
  • Spiritual growth

Love becomes a place of restoration instead of exhaustion.

Why Trauma Bonds Feel Like Love

One of the greatest challenges is that trauma bonds often feel incredibly powerful.

The brain releases dopamine during moments of reconciliation after emotional pain, reinforcing attachment despite ongoing harm. Chronic stress also activates survival systems involving cortisol and adrenaline, making emotional separation feel threatening even when it is necessary.

This explains why individuals frequently say:

“I know this relationship isn’t healthy, but I can’t seem to leave.”

The attachment is real.

The relationship, however, may not be healthy.

Breaking Free from Trauma Bonding

Recovery begins with awareness.

Healing often includes:

  • Learning to recognize unhealthy relationship patterns.
  • Rebuilding healthy personal boundaries.
  • Seeking support from trusted friends, family, or mental health professionals.
  • Challenging distorted beliefs about self-worth.
  • Practicing self-compassion.
  • Developing emotionally safe relationships.

Healing rarely happens overnight.

It occurs one healthy decision at a time.

Choosing Healthy Bonding

Healthy relationships are not perfect.

They still involve disagreements, disappointments, and moments of frustration.

The difference is that healthy relationships remain grounded in:

  • Trust
  • Respect
  • Emotional safety
  • Accountability
  • Honesty
  • Compassion
  • Consistency

These qualities foster resilience instead of fear.

Conclusion

Trauma bonding and healthy bonding can appear similar on the surface because both involve strong emotional attachment. The difference lies in the foundation upon which that attachment is built.

Trauma bonds are sustained through fear, unpredictability, manipulation, and emotional dependency. Healthy bonds are sustained through trust, respect, consistency, and emotional safety.

Recognizing the difference empowers individuals to make choices that protect their emotional health and foster lasting well-being. While breaking a trauma bond may be one of the most difficult journeys a person undertakes, it is also one of the most courageous. Healing is possible, and healthy relationships are attainable.

You deserve a love that helps you grow—not one that requires you to lose yourself.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S, is a licensed clinical social worker and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With over two decades of experience in behavioral health, he writes at the intersection of evidence-based practice, lived experience, and Christian hope. Throughout his career, John has helped individuals and families navigate trauma, anxiety, depression, grief, relationship challenges, and life transitions. His passion is translating complex psychological concepts into practical, compassionate guidance that empowers readers to pursue emotional healing, personal growth, and lasting resilience. Whether writing for clinicians, faith communities, or the general public, John seeks to provide resources that are both scientifically grounded and deeply encouraging.

References

Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. L. (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachments in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse. Victimology, 6(1–4), 139–155.

Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal Trauma: The Logic of Forgetting Childhood Abuse. Harvard University Press.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (Revised ed.). Harmony Books.

Herman, J. L. (2022). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (3rd ed.). Basic Books.

Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment Theory in Practice: Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) with Individuals, Couples, and Families. Guilford Press.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2015). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books.

When Loneliness Tricks You Into Going Back

Learning the Difference Between Missing Someone and Missing Connection

Article 6: Part of the Healing After Heartbreak Series

It Usually Happens at Night

The house is quiet. Dinner is over. The television is on, but you’re not really watching it. You glance at your phone. You wonder what they’re doing. Then a familiar thought slips into your mind.

“Maybe I should just text them.”

You don’t necessarily believe getting back together is the right decision. In fact, you’ve probably reminded yourself many times why the relationship ended. Yet in this moment, none of that seems to matter.

You don’t miss the arguments. You don’t miss the disappointment. You don’t even miss the stress. You simply don’t want to feel alone. That is one of the greatest emotional traps after heartbreak. Loneliness has a way of disguising itself as love.

Loneliness Can Sound Like Love

After a relationship ends, many people assume that every longing they feel is evidence that they still belong together. Sometimes that’s true. Often, it isn’t. Loneliness and love are two very different experiences, but they can feel remarkably similar. Love says, “I care deeply about this person and want what is best for both of us.” Loneliness says, “I don’t want to feel this empty anymore.”

The problem is that emotional pain makes those two voices difficult to separate.

Research has consistently shown that loneliness affects both emotional and physical well-being. It can increase stress, heighten anxiety, and even change the way we interpret situations, making unhealthy relationships seem more appealing simply because they feel familiar (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008).

When we are lonely, we are often searching for relief—not necessarily for the healthiest relationship.

Your Brain Prefers Familiar Pain

There is an old saying that people sometimes choose familiar pain over unfamiliar peace. There is more truth in that than many realize. The human brain likes predictability. Even when a relationship was unhealthy, it was familiar. You knew how the conversations would go. You knew their habits, their routines, and even their flaws.

Life after a breakup is uncertain. Uncertainty feels uncomfortable. Sometimes the mind begins to romanticize the past simply because it feels safer than the unknown future. That doesn’t mean the relationship was healthy. It simply means it was familiar.

A Story That Happens Every Day

Jason had been divorced for almost eight months. During the day, he stayed busy with work. He exercised, spent time with friends, and was beginning to feel hopeful again. Then weekends arrived. Saturday mornings were the hardest. For years, he and his wife had eaten breakfast together before deciding what to do with the day. Now he sat alone with a cup of coffee, scrolling through his phone.

One Saturday he nearly called her. Not because he believed the marriage could be repaired. Not because he had forgotten why they divorced. He simply didn’t want to eat breakfast alone. Fortunately, he recognized what was happening. Instead of making the call, he invited his brother to breakfast. That simple decision didn’t erase his loneliness. But it prevented loneliness from making a decision his wisdom would later regret.

Missing Connection Is Part of Being Human

We were created for connection. Healthy relationships provide comfort, encouragement, companionship, and belonging. When those relationships end, there is naturally an empty space. The mistake many people make is believing the only person who can fill that space is the one who left. Healing often begins when we realize that connection can come from many places. A meaningful conversation with a friend.

  • Dinner with family.
  • Volunteering in the community.
  • Joining a support group.
  • Serving at church.
  • Building new friendships.

None of these relationships replace the one that ended. They simply remind us that life is still full of people capable of caring about us.

Ask Yourself One Honest Question

The next time you feel an overwhelming urge to contact your former partner, pause for a moment. Instead of immediately reaching for your phone, ask yourself:

“Do I miss this person…or do I simply miss not being alone?”

That question isn’t meant to shame you. It’s meant to bring clarity. Sometimes the answer will surprise you. Many people discover they are grieving companionship more than compatibility. There is an important difference. Companionship can be rebuilt. Compatibility cannot be forced.

Therapist’s Note

Loneliness is a feeling. It is not a direction. Feelings deserve to be acknowledged, but they do not always deserve to make our decisions. Some of the healthiest choices you will ever make are the ones you make while your emotions are still catching up.

A Healing Exercise: Build a Connection Plan

Instead of creating a list of reasons not to contact your former partner, create a plan for reconnecting with life.

Take out a journal and write the names of five people you trust. They might be family members, close friends, coworkers, or people from church or your community. Beside each name, write one simple way you could reconnect with them during the next two weeks. It might be inviting someone to lunch, making a phone call, taking a walk together, or simply sending a message asking how they are doing.

Next, write down three activities that help you feel connected to yourself. Perhaps it’s hiking, reading, woodworking, painting, exercising, gardening, or attending a Bible study. These aren’t distractions from your pain. They are reminders that your identity is larger than one relationship.

Finally, ask yourself this question:

“What kind of life am I trying to build, even while I am healing?”

That question shifts your focus from what you’ve lost to what you are creating.

Final Thoughts

There will be days when loneliness whispers that the quickest way to feel better is to go backward. Don’t confuse relief with healing. Relief is temporary. Healing is lasting. The goal isn’t simply to stop feeling lonely. The goal is to build a life so rich with purpose, healthy relationships, faith, and hope that loneliness no longer gets to decide where you go next. One day you will notice that you no longer reach for your phone every evening. Not because you’ve forgotten. But because your life has quietly become full again. And that fullness won’t come from returning to the past. It will come from continuing to walk toward the future.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and the Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in the behavioral health field, he has worked with individuals, couples, families, and communities facing some of life’s most difficult challenges.

His clinical expertise includes trauma, grief, anxiety, depression, relationship issues, and life transitions. John believes that healing happens when people feel seen, heard, and supported with compassion and respect. He is passionate about translating psychological research into practical tools that empower people to understand their emotions, strengthen their relationships, and build healthier, more meaningful lives.

As a therapist, speaker, and writer, John’s goal is simple: to offer hope, guidance, and practical solutions for real-life struggles. He lives in Southeast Kentucky and is deeply committed to serving his community.

References

Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. W. W. Norton & Company.

Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218–227.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Love, Loss, and the Space Between: Stop Avoiding Pain and Start Living Your Life. Hay House.

Series Reminder

Healing doesn’t mean forgetting. It means carrying yesterday without letting it steal tomorrow.