Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Tag Hope

Grieving Someone Who Is Still Alive

When the Person Is Gone from Your Life but Still Walking Through Theirs

Article 4: Part of the Healing After Heartbreak Series

They Didn’t Die. They Just Left.

There is a unique kind of grief that few people talk about. It comes when someone you deeply loved is still alive, still breathing, still going to work, still laughing with friends, still posting pictures online—but they are no longer part of your life.

There was no funeral. No obituary. No gathering where people came together to honor the loss. Instead, there was a text message. A difficult conversation. A signed divorce decree. Or perhaps there was nothing at all except silence.

People around you may expect you to move on quickly because “they’re still alive.” But your heart doesn’t measure loss by whether someone is living. It measures loss by absence. It knows that the person who once shared your mornings, your dreams, your holidays, and your future is suddenly gone from your everyday life. That absence is real. And it deserves to be grieved.

A Different Kind of Grief

Most people understand the grief that follows death. Society has rituals for it. Friends send flowers. Employers offer bereavement leave. Neighbors bring meals. There is an understanding that healing will take time.

Relationship loss is different.

Often, people tell you to “get over it,” “find someone else,” or “everything happens for a reason.” While those words may be well-intentioned, they can unintentionally minimize a very real loss. Psychologist Pauline Boss introduced the concept of ambiguous loss, describing situations in which someone is physically present but psychologically or emotionally absent from our lives (Boss, 1999). Although her work often focused on families dealing with dementia, addiction, or missing loved ones, the concept also helps explain why the end of a significant relationship can feel so confusing. The person still exists, but the relationship you once depended on does not. Your heart struggles because there is no clear ending.

There is simply…absence.

You Aren’t Just Grieving a Person

When relationships end, we often believe we are grieving only the individual. In reality, we are grieving much more than that. You are grieving the future you imagined.

You are grieving the traditions you thought you would build together. The vacations you planned but never took. The anniversaries that will never be celebrated. The conversations you assumed you would have twenty years from now. Sometimes the deepest pain isn’t remembering what happened. It’s realizing what will never happen. That realization can feel overwhelming because it requires letting go of a future that once felt certain.

Imagine This

Imagine spending months planning the home of your dreams. You carefully choose the floor plan, the paint colors, and where the furniture will go. You picture birthdays around the dining room table, Christmas mornings in the living room, and quiet evenings on the back porch. Then, just before construction begins, the project is canceled. The house never exists. Yet you still grieve it.

Why?

Because your mind had already begun living there.

Relationships work the same way. Long before the future arrives, we emotionally move into it. We begin decorating it with hopes, dreams, and expectations. When the relationship ends, it isn’t just today’s happiness that disappears. It is the imagined future that disappears with it.

Why Certain Moments Hurt So Much

One of the most confusing parts of healing is that grief often arrives without warning. You may be doing well for several days, feeling hopeful and optimistic, when suddenly you hear your song playing in a restaurant. A familiar cologne passes by in a crowded store. Someone laughs exactly the way they did.

In an instant, your emotions rush back. Many people interpret these moments as setbacks. They aren’t.

Our brains naturally connect emotions to sights, sounds, smells, and places. Those memories become part of the brain’s filing system. When something familiar appears, it temporarily reopens that file. That doesn’t mean you are moving backward. It simply means your brain remembers. Over time, those emotional reactions usually become less intense, even though the memories remain.

A Story That May Feel Familiar

After twelve years of marriage, Robert found himself eating dinner alone for the first time in decades.

For weeks, he continued setting two plates on the table before catching himself. Every Friday evening he automatically drove toward the neighborhood where they used to meet friends for dinner. He wasn’t consciously trying to relive the past. His life had simply followed those routines for so many years that his mind continued them without asking permission.

One evening, instead of driving to the familiar restaurant, he stopped at a small local café he had never visited before. He brought a book, ordered something different, and sat quietly by the window. It wasn’t a magical moment. He still missed her. He still cried on the drive home. But something important happened that evening.

For the first time since the separation, he created a memory that belonged only to him. Healing often begins that way—not with dramatic breakthroughs, but with small moments that slowly become the foundation of a new life.

Therapist’s Note

One of the greatest misconceptions about grief is believing that healing means you stop loving someone. It doesn’t. You can appreciate what a relationship once meant while also accepting that it no longer belongs in your future. Acceptance is not betrayal. Acceptance is giving yourself permission to keep living.

A Healing Exercise: Saying Goodbye to the Future You Imagined

Tonight, find a quiet place with a journal or a blank sheet of paper. Write a letter—not to the person—but to the future you thought you were going to have. Describe the life you imagined together. Write about the dreams, the plans, the traditions, and the milestones that now feel lost. Don’t worry about grammar or saying the “right” thing. Simply let your heart speak honestly. When you finish, begin a second paragraph with these words:

“Although that future is gone, I still have the opportunity to create a meaningful life, and my next step is…”

Complete the sentence. Don’t try to write the rest of your life story. Just write the next step. Healing rarely requires us to know the entire journey. It simply asks us to take the next faithful step.

Final Thoughts

Perhaps the hardest part of grieving someone who is still alive is accepting that closure rarely arrives the way we hope it will. Sometimes there is no final conversation. No apology. No explanation that suddenly makes everything make sense. Sometimes healing begins when we stop waiting for someone else to provide closure and begin creating it ourselves. Your story did not end because this relationship did. There are still chapters left to write. New friendships to build. New places to explore. New laughter waiting to be discovered. And one day, when you look back, you may realize that while losing them changed your life, it did not define it. Your future is still waiting.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health, grief counseling, and relationship therapy, he has helped countless individuals navigate loss, rebuild their lives, and discover hope after heartbreak. His writing combines evidence-based psychology with compassionate, practical guidance to help readers heal one step at a time.

References

Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Harvard University Press.

Boss, P. (2006). Loss, Trauma, and Resilience: Therapeutic Work with Ambiguous Loss. W. W. Norton & Company.

Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Techniques of Grief Therapy: Assessment and Intervention. Routledge.

Worden, J. W. (2018). Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy (5th ed.). Springer Publishing.

Series Reminder

Healing doesn’t mean forgetting. It means carrying yesterday without letting it steal tomorrow.

When Your Heart Wants Them Back but Your Mind Knows Better:

Understanding the Battle Between Emotion and Logic After Heartbreak

Article Three: Part of the Healing After Heartbreak Series

Your Phone Lights Up

Your phone vibrates. For just a second, your heart races.

“Maybe it’s them.”

You reach for your phone almost before your mind has time to think. But it isn’t. It’s a weather alert. Or a friend. Or an advertisement. Your heart sinks just as quickly as it leaped. Then, almost immediately, another thought appears.

  • “Maybe I should text them.”
  • “Maybe enough time has passed.”
  • “Maybe they’ve changed.”

Your mind quietly reminds you why the relationship ended. Your heart answers, “Yes…but I still miss them.” If you’ve ever felt like your heart and your mind were arguing with each other, you’re not alone. This internal battle is one of the most common experiences after the end of a meaningful relationship.

Why Do I Feel This Way?

Many people believe that if they know a relationship was unhealthy, they shouldn’t miss the other person. Unfortunately, emotions don’t work that way. Love is more than a decision. It is also a collection of memories, routines, hopes, dreams, habits, and emotional bonds that were built over time.

When a relationship ends, those bonds do not disappear overnight. Your logical mind may understand that the relationship needed to end. Your emotional brain is still adjusting to the loss. That isn’t weakness. It’s part of being human.

Research has shown that romantic attachment shares many characteristics with other forms of attachment. When those attachments are broken, the brain often continues seeking closeness even after the relationship has ended (Fisher, Brown, Aron, Strong, & Mashek, 2010).

Your Brain Loves Familiar

Imagine you’ve driven the same road to work every morning for five years. One day, the road closes. Even though you know it is closed, you may still find yourself turning toward it out of habit. Relationships create similar emotional pathways. You became used to hearing their voice. Sharing good news. Sending funny memes. Talking before bed. Planning weekends. Your brain became familiar with that routine.

Now the routine is gone. The longing you feel is not always a sign that the relationship was right. Sometimes it is simply a sign that the relationship was familiar.

Missing Someone Doesn’t Always Mean You Should Go Back

This is one of the hardest truths to accept. You can deeply miss someone……and still know they were not good for you. Both things can be true. Consider these examples:

  • A person may miss someone who constantly criticized them.
  • Someone may long for an ex who repeatedly broke their trust.
  • A person may miss the companionship of a relationship even though they were unhappy most of the time.

Missing someone is evidence that you loved. It is not evidence that returning is the healthiest choice.

A Real-Life Example

Imagine a woman named Sarah who spent eight years with someone she loved deeply. Over time, the relationship became filled with broken promises, constant arguments, and emotional distance. When they finally separated, Sarah knew it was the right decision.

Yet every evening around six o’clock she reached for her phone. Not because anything had changed. Because for eight years, six o’clock was when they talked about their day. Her heart missed the routine. Her mind remembered the reality.

Healing required learning to create a new evening routine rather than returning to an unhealthy relationship simply because the old one felt familiar.

Love Can Leave an Echo

Think about walking through a canyon. You shout once. The sound continues long after you’ve stopped speaking. Relationships can leave emotional echoes. You may hear a song. Drive past a favorite restaurant. See someone wearing their favorite color. Smell a familiar perfume or cologne. Suddenly, your heart feels as if the breakup happened yesterday. That doesn’t mean you’ve failed. It means memories are connected to your senses. Over time, those echoes become quieter.

Signs Your Heart and Mind Are Disagreeing

You might notice thoughts like these:

Your Heart Says:

  • “I miss them.”
  • “I just want one more conversation.”
  • “Maybe this time will be different.”
  • “I still love them.”

Your Mind Says:

  • “Remember why it ended.”
  • “You deserve consistency.”
  • “Love should not require constant suffering.”
  • “Missing someone isn’t the same as needing them.”

Learning to listen to both—and letting wisdom guide your decisions—is part of emotional maturity.

Therapist’s Note

One of the greatest acts of self-respect is refusing to confuse loneliness with compatibility. There are moments when your heart will ask you to go back simply because moving forward feels unfamiliar. Give your heart compassion. But let your values steer your life.

What You Can Do

The next time you feel the urge to reach out to someone you know is unhealthy for you, pause before acting. Ask yourself these questions:

  • Do I miss this person, or do I miss having someone?
  • Am I remembering the whole relationship or only the good moments?
  • If nothing about this person changed, would I still choose this relationship?
  • Am I looking for healing or temporary relief?

Then write your answers down. Sometimes seeing your thoughts on paper helps your emotions catch up with what your mind already knows.

Build a New Routine

One of the healthiest ways to quiet emotional longing is to replace old routines with new ones. Instead of checking your phone every evening:

  • Go for a walk.
  • Read for twenty minutes.
  • Call a friend.
  • Learn a new hobby.
  • Spend time in prayer or meditation.
  • Exercise.
  • Journal about your progress.

You are not simply filling time. You are teaching your brain that life continues.

Final Thoughts

There may come a day when you think about them and smile instead of cry. Not because they came back. But because you finally came back to yourself. Healing is not forgetting someone who mattered. Healing is remembering yourself enough to stop chasing what continues to hurt you. Your heart may take longer than your mind. That’s okay. Walk at the pace of healing, not the pace of loneliness.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health, trauma, grief, and relationship counseling, he has helped individuals understand the connection between emotions, thoughts, and healthy decision-making. His goal is to make psychological concepts practical, hopeful, and accessible for people navigating life’s most difficult seasons.

References

Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Love, Loss, and the Space Between: Stop Avoiding Pain and Start Living Your Life. Hay House.

Series Reminder

Healing doesn’t mean forgetting. It means carrying yesterday without letting it steal tomorrow.

Grieving the Future You Thought You Would Have

Why Losing a Dream Can Hurt as Much as Losing a Person

Imagine This…

Imagine walking into an empty house.

The walls are bare. The rooms are quiet. There are no family pictures. No laughter. No smell of dinner cooking.

But in your mind, the house is full.

You see birthday parties in the living room. Christmas mornings around the tree. Quiet evenings sitting together on the porch. You picture growing old with the person you love.

Then one conversation changes everything. The future you imagined is suddenly gone. Now you are not only grieving the person you loved. You are grieving the life you thought you were going to have. That kind of pain is real.

Why Does This Hurt So Much?

When we fall in love, our minds naturally begin thinking about tomorrow. We imagine holidays together. We talk about places we want to visit. We dream about growing old side by side. We picture birthdays, anniversaries, and family traditions.

Our brain starts treating those dreams like they are already part of our life. When the relationship ends, we lose more than the person. We also lose the future we believed was coming. That is why heartbreak often feels much bigger than people expect.

Your Brain Is Trying to Make Sense of It

Our brains like certainty. They want to know what tomorrow will look like. When we feel safe with someone, our brain begins filling in the blanks. It says things like:

“We’ll always be together.”

“We’ll get married someday.”

“We’ll grow old together.”

Those thoughts feel real because we repeat them over and over. When the relationship ends, our brain suddenly has to erase a future it had already accepted. That takes time.

The Difference Between Reality and the Story We Tell Ourselves

There is an important difference between facts and assumptions. A fact is something that really happened. An assumption is something we believed would happen.

For example:

Fact: You loved someone.

Fact: You spent time planning a future together.

Assumption: Everything would work out exactly as you imagined. Many people spend months grieving the assumptions more than the facts. That does not make them weak. It makes them human.

We Sometimes Fall in Love with Tomorrow

Most people do not realize they are doing it. We begin to love birthdays that have never happened. We miss vacations we never took. We grieve children that were never born. We cry over conversations that never happened.

We mourn a retirement beside someone who may never have been there. Those dreams mattered because they gave us hope. Hope is powerful. When hope is broken, our hearts feel broken too.

Be Careful Not to Rewrite the Past

When we are hurting, we often remember only the good moments. We forget the disagreements. We forget the red flags. We forget the hard conversations. Our mind tries to protect us by showing us only the happiest memories. That is normal. But healing requires us to remember the whole story—not just the parts we wish had lasted forever.

A Simple Exercise

Take out a piece of paper. Draw a line down the middle. On one side write Facts. On the other side write Assumptions.

For example:

Facts

Assumptions

We loved each other.

We would grow old together.

We talked about marriage.

We were guaranteed to marry.

We planned a future.

That future was certain.

The relationship ended.

I will never be happy again.

When you finish, read only the facts.

You may notice that many of the thoughts causing the deepest pain are assumptions, not reality.

That does not make your pain less real.

It simply helps your mind separate what happened from what you feared losing.

Healing Takes Time

You cannot force your heart to stop hurting. You cannot flip a switch and move on. Healing happens one day at a time. Some mornings you will feel strong. Other mornings you may feel like you are starting over. That is okay. Healing is not a straight line. It is a journey. Keep taking the next step.

Eventually, the future you thought you lost will slowly make room for a new future you never expected.

Final Thoughts

One of the hardest parts of heartbreak is realizing that you are not only grieving a person. You are grieving birthdays that never happened. Anniversaries that were never celebrated. Dreams that never became memories. But remember this.

Just because one future ended does not mean your story is over. God is still writing the chapters you have not read yet. And sometimes the pages you never expected become the most beautiful part of the story.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S, is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Supervisor and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC. With more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health, he has worked with individuals and families facing grief, trauma, anxiety, depression, relationship struggles, and life transitions. His writing combines clinical research with everyday language to help people better understand their emotions, develop healthy coping skills, and find hope during life’s most difficult seasons.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

Beck, J. S. (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. Basic Books.

Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Techniques of grief therapy: Assessment and intervention. Routledge.

Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Boerner, K. (2017). Cautioning health-care professionals: Bereaved persons are misguided through the stages of grief. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 74(4), 455–473.

When Change Only Comes After Divorce Is Mentioned

Understanding the Cycle of Relationship Crisis, Temporary Change, Renewed Hope, and Disappointment

Deciding whether to end a marriage is rarely based on one argument, one disappointment, or one difficult season. For many individuals, the desire for divorce develops slowly after months—or even years—of feeling unheard, emotionally neglected, unsupported, dismissed, lonely, or repeatedly disappointed.

The decision may come only after concerns have been expressed many times, promises have been made, opportunities for change have been offered, and hope has repeatedly been restored and lost.

Then something unexpected happens.

When the spouse finally realizes that separation or divorce is no longer an empty possibility—but a genuine decision—they may suddenly begin doing everything their partner had been asking them to do.

They become more attentive.

They communicate.

They show affection.

They help around the home.

They spend more time with the family.

They apologize.

They begin counseling.

They express appreciation.

They make promises.

They become the spouse their partner had needed for years.

Rather than making the decision easier, this sudden improvement may create intense guilt and uncertainty.

The person considering divorce may begin asking:

“How can I leave when they are trying so hard?”

“What if they really have changed this time?”

“What if I am walking away just when our marriage is finally getting better?”

“Am I being selfish?”

“Am I giving up too soon?”

These questions are understandable. However, the current effort cannot be evaluated separately from the history that made divorce feel necessary.

The Relationship Crisis Cycle

In some marriages, the relationship develops a repeating pattern:

Unmet needs → communication of concerns → promises of change → temporary improvement → renewed hope → gradual return to old behaviors → disappointment → emotional exhaustion → discussion of separation or divorce → intense effort → guilt → reconciliation → temporary stability → return to old patterns

Each time the cycle repeats, hope may become more difficult to trust.

The spouse who wants change may initially communicate concerns gently. When little changes, the concerns may be repeated more urgently. Eventually, frustration, emotional distance, resentment, or hopelessness may develop.

Research has identified a related relationship pattern known as demand-withdraw communication. In this pattern, one partner repeatedly seeks discussion, emotional connection, accountability, or change while the other avoids, withdraws, becomes defensive, minimizes the concern, or disengages. Demand-withdraw patterns are associated with relationship distress and other negative individual and relational outcomes. (⁠PMC)

Over time, the partner seeking change may stop asking—not because the problem has been resolved, but because repeated attempts have become emotionally exhausting.

Silence may then be misunderstood as satisfaction.

The other spouse may believe:

“Things have been better lately. We have not been arguing.”

Meanwhile, the emotionally exhausted spouse may be thinking:

“I stopped arguing because I no longer believe anything will change.”

The absence of conflict does not always mean the presence of connection. Sometimes people become quiet because they have lost hope that expressing their needs will make a difference.

Why Does Change Sometimes Begin Only When Divorce Becomes Real?

The possibility of divorce creates an immediate consequence.

Concerns that once seemed distant suddenly become urgent. The spouse may recognize that the marriage, family structure, home, companionship, financial stability, daily routine, identity, or future they assumed would always remain may actually be lost.

This realization can produce fear, grief, regret, urgency, and motivation.

The effort may be sincere.

It is important not to assume that every sudden improvement is intentionally deceptive or manipulative. A spouse may genuinely recognize the seriousness of the situation and sincerely want to change.

However, sincerity in a moment of crisis does not automatically predict consistency after the crisis has passed.

A person can genuinely mean:

“I will do better.”

They may fully believe it when they say it.

The more important question is whether they have developed the insight, accountability, emotional skills, support, and behavioral habits necessary to continue doing better when the immediate fear of divorce decreases.

Fear can motivate action. Fear does not always sustain transformation.

The Difference Between Crisis-Driven Change and Lasting Change

Crisis-driven change often begins with intensity.

There may be dramatic apologies, increased affection, frequent communication, promises, gifts, household involvement, emotional conversations, counseling appointments, or immediate attempts to meet needs that had previously been ignored.

The change may feel powerful because it is so different from the behavior that came before it.

However, intensity and permanence are not the same.

Lasting relationship improvement generally depends less on dramatic gestures and more on repeated habits, communication, accountability, and shared responsibility over time. Relationship improvement is typically built through consistent patterns rather than isolated moments of extraordinary effort. (⁠The Washington Post)

Temporary change often says:

“Tell me what I need to do so you will stay.”

Lasting change asks:

“What have my choices done to you, what do I need to understand, and what must I continue changing whether or not I immediately receive the outcome I want?”

Temporary change may focus primarily on preventing divorce.

Lasting change addresses the patterns that made divorce feel necessary.

Why the Person Considering Divorce May Feel Guilty

Guilt may arise because the current version of the spouse appears different from the version experienced throughout much of the relationship.

The person considering divorce may think:

“They are finally giving me what I asked for. How can I leave now?”

However, this creates an emotional conflict between two realities:

Present reality:
“They are trying very hard.”

Historical reality:
“I have experienced this improvement before, and it did not last.”

Both realities may be true.

The current effort does not erase the previous pain.

The previous pain does not automatically prove that the current effort is false.

The challenge is determining whether the new behavior represents a temporary reaction to loss or the beginning of sustainable change.

Guilt may also develop because the spouse considering divorce is often compassionate. They may see the other person crying, struggling, apologizing, or expressing fear. They may feel responsible for relieving that pain.

However, compassion does not require ignoring one’s own experiences.

A person may care deeply about a spouse’s pain while still acknowledging the pain that led them to consider leaving.

“Why Did It Take Divorce for My Needs to Matter?”

This may be one of the most painful questions within the cycle.

The spouse considering divorce may wonder:

“Why were my tears not enough?”

“Why were years of conversations not enough?”

“Why did I have to become emotionally exhausted before I was heard?”

“Why did losing me become more important than listening to me?”

These questions do not necessarily mean that the other spouse never cared. Some individuals minimize relationship concerns, avoid uncomfortable emotions, resist change, assume the relationship will always remain intact, or fail to understand the seriousness of their partner’s distress.

However, repeated inaction can still cause harm even when harm was not intended.

Intent and impact are different.

A spouse may say:

Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The relationship between the desire for change in one’s partner and marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66(4), 361–378.  

“I never intended to make you feel alone.”

The other spouse may truthfully respond:

“But I was still alone.”

Understanding intent may provide context. It does not erase impact.

When Hope Becomes Part of the Cycle

Hope is usually considered positive. In a repeating relationship cycle, however, renewed hope may become one of the reasons the pattern continues.

The spouse improves.

The partner feels hopeful.

The discussion of divorce stops.

The immediate crisis decreases.

Life gradually returns to normal.

The new behaviors become less frequent.

Old habits return.

The same needs remain unmet.

The same pain returns.

Eventually, divorce is discussed again—and the effort begins again.

Each period of improvement may make leaving more difficult because it provides evidence of what the relationship could be.

The painful question becomes:

“If they are capable of being this person now, why could they not continue being this person before?”

Potential can be powerful. However, a relationship cannot survive indefinitely on potential alone.

A person must eventually evaluate the relationship not only by its best moments, but by its most consistent patterns.

Promises Are Not the Same as Patterns

Promises describe intentions.

Patterns demonstrate behavior.

A promise says:

“I will communicate better.”

A pattern demonstrates regular, respectful communication even after conflict decreases.

A promise says:

“I will make you a priority.”

A pattern consistently protects time, connection, emotional presence, and partnership.

A promise says:

“I will go to counseling.”

A pattern attends counseling consistently, participates honestly, accepts feedback, practices new skills, and continues the work when sessions become uncomfortable.

A promise says:

“I will never take you for granted again.”

A pattern expresses appreciation during ordinary life—not only during a relationship emergency.

Words may begin change.

Repeated behavior provides evidence of change.

Questions That May Help Evaluate the Difference

Rather than asking only, “Are they trying?” it may be helpful to consider the following:

  1. Did the change begin before divorce was mentioned, or only after the possibility of loss became real?
  2. Has this same period of intense effort occurred before?
  3. What happened after previous relationship crises ended?
  4. Is the spouse accepting responsibility without blame, excuses, minimization, or defensiveness?
  5. Are they interested in understanding the pain they caused, or primarily focused on preventing the divorce?
  6. Are they making specific behavioral changes rather than offering general promises?
  7. Are they willing to seek professional help and remain engaged over time?
  8. Do they respect the other spouse’s need for time, boundaries, or emotional space?
  9. Does the improvement continue when reassurance is not immediately provided?
  10. Would the effort likely continue if divorce were no longer being discussed?
  11. Has enough time passed to distinguish a new pattern from a temporary response?
  12. Is the relationship becoming emotionally healthier—or merely temporarily calmer?

These questions are not designed to predetermine whether someone should remain married or seek divorce. They are intended to help separate emotional urgency from observable patterns.

What Lasting Change May Look Like

Sustainable change usually becomes visible through consistency.

It may include:

  • Accepting responsibility without repeatedly shifting blame
  • Listening without immediately becoming defensive
  • Demonstrating empathy for the spouse’s experience
  • Following through without needing reminders
  • Continuing counseling after the immediate crisis has passed
  • Changing behavior even when no praise or reassurance is received
  • Respecting boundaries
  • Developing healthier communication skills
  • Addressing underlying issues rather than only reducing immediate conflict
  • Recognizing that trust may require time to rebuild
  • Understanding that forgiveness does not automatically restore trust
  • Continuing the work even when reconciliation is uncertain

Research on distressed relationships emphasizes that recurring communication patterns can become self-reinforcing. Changing the relationship therefore requires more than one partner briefly behaving differently; it requires sustained changes in how both partners communicate, respond, repair conflict, and address unmet needs. (⁠PMC)

Change Does Not Create an Immediate Obligation to Stay

When a spouse begins trying, the other spouse may feel obligated to immediately forgive, trust, reconcile, withdraw the request for divorce, or return emotionally to the marriage.

However, effort does not create an automatic obligation.

The spouse who has been hurt may need time to determine whether the change is sustainable.

Trust is not rebuilt because someone promises that the future will be different.

Trust is rebuilt when repeated experiences gradually provide evidence that the future may be different.

The spouse making changes may say:

“What else do I have to do to prove myself?”

The answer may not be another dramatic action.

The answer may simply be:

“Continue.”

Continue when the fear decreases.

Continue when the divorce conversation is no longer happening every day.

Continue when life becomes ordinary.

Continue when no one is watching.

Continue when change is inconvenient.

Continue after the dust settles.

Consistency is what allows change to become believable.

A Necessary Distinction: Relationship Cycles Are Not Automatically Abuse Cycles

A repeating pattern of neglect, conflict, temporary improvement, and disappointment should not automatically be labeled an “abuse cycle.”

Many distressed relationships involve unhealthy communication, avoidance, emotional disconnection, broken promises, or inconsistent effort without involving abuse.

The cycle of violence is a specific framework associated with abusive relationships and has traditionally included phases involving increasing tension, abusive incidents, and periods of reconciliation or calm. (⁠PMC)

Therefore, relationship disappointment and abuse should not be treated as interchangeable.

However, if the relationship includes intimidation, threats, coercive control, physical violence, sexual coercion, stalking, financial control, isolation, fear, or retaliation for attempting to leave, the situation requires a safety-focused assessment rather than ordinary couples communication strategies. Research indicates that coercive control can significantly influence the severity and impact of intimate partner violence. (⁠PMC)

In those situations, safety should take priority over preserving the relationship.

Couples Counseling May Help Clarify the Pattern

Couples counseling does not have to begin with the assumption that the marriage must remain together.

Therapy may help partners:

  • Identify repeating relationship patterns
  • Understand unmet emotional needs
  • Improve communication
  • Examine accountability
  • Develop measurable behavioral changes
  • Rebuild trust when appropriate
  • Determine whether reconciliation is realistic
  • Establish healthier boundaries
  • Make thoughtful decisions about the future

Counseling may also help couples separate more respectfully when reconciliation is not possible or healthy.

However, couples counseling is not always appropriate when active abuse, coercive control, intimidation, or fear prevents honest participation. Those situations may require specialized individual support and safety planning.

The Question Is Not Only, “Are They Trying Now?”

Current effort matters.

It should not automatically be dismissed.

People can change.

Marriages can heal.

Partners can recognize their failures, develop healthier skills, rebuild trust, and create relationships that are different from what existed before.

But change should not be evaluated only by how intensely someone responds when they are afraid of losing the relationship.

The larger question is:

“Has the pattern changed—or has the fear of consequences temporarily changed the behavior?”

A few good days may provide hope.

A few good weeks may demonstrate effort.

Sustained accountability and consistent behavior over time provide stronger evidence of change.

The spouse considering divorce does not have to ignore present effort.

They also do not have to erase the past in order to acknowledge the present.

Both truths may exist:

“I see that you are trying.”

And:

“I am afraid because I have seen this effort disappear before.”

Ultimately, the decision is not only about who a spouse becomes when the marriage is at risk.

It is also about who they consistently choose to be after the crisis has passed.

Final Thought

Sometimes the most difficult part of considering divorce is not leaving someone who refuses to change.

It is deciding what to do when they finally become everything you needed—but only after you became willing to leave.

The question may no longer be:

“Do I believe they are trying?”

The question may become:

“Has enough changed, for long enough, and with enough accountability for me to safely trust that this time will be different?”

Current effort deserves acknowledgment.

Past experience deserves consideration.

Future trust requires consistency.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with more than 25 years of experience in behavioral health and human services. He is the founder and Executive Director of Southeast Kentucky Behavioral Health, LLC, where he provides clinical leadership and works to improve access to quality behavioral-health services and supports throughout Kentucky.

Throughout his career, John has worked with individuals, couples, families, children, and adults experiencing relationship difficulties, emotional distress, behavioral challenges, significant life transitions, grief, trauma, anxiety, depression, and other complex circumstances. His professional work emphasizes compassion, personal responsibility, healthy communication, emotional awareness, meaningful behavioral change, and the importance of recognizing the difference between intentions, promises, and consistent actions.

As a therapist, writer, educator, and speaker, John seeks to help people better understand the thoughts, emotions, experiences, and relationship patterns that influence their lives. His writing combines professional knowledge with practical insight and personal reflection to encourage readers to examine difficult experiences with honesty, empathy, and hope.

John believes that healthy relationships are not sustained by words spoken during moments of fear or crisis. They are strengthened through accountability, emotional safety, mutual respect, open communication, shared effort, and consistent actions demonstrated during the ordinary moments of everyday life.

His educational articles are intended to encourage reflection, promote meaningful conversations, and help individuals make thoughtful, informed, and values-based decisions regarding their relationships, emotional well-being, and personal growth.

References

Here is a corrected, alphabetized APA 7th edition reference list for the article:

References

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as a predictor of the demand-withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 66–89. doi:10.1080/03637759909376462

Dichter, M. E., Thomas, K. A., Crits-Christoph, P., Ogden, S. N., & Rhodes, K. V. (2018). Coercive control in intimate partner violence: Relationship with women’s experience of violence, use of violence, and danger. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 596–604. doi:10.1037/vio0000158

Leo, K., Crenshaw, A. O., Hogan, J. N., Bourne, S. V., Baucom, K. J. W., & Baucom, B. R. W. (2021). A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand-withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 534–545. doi:10.1037/fam0000802

Papp, L. M., Kouros, C. D., & Cummings, E. M. (2009). Demand-withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home. Personal Relationships, 16(2), 285–300. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01223.x

Sangeetha, J., Mohan, S., Hariharasudan, A., & Nawaz, N. (2022). Strategic analysis of intimate partner violence and the cycle of violence in the autobiographical text When I Hit You. Heliyon, 8(6), Article e09727. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09727