Welcome to SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Tag resilience

Be Content With What You Have, But Never With Who You Are Becoming

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

There comes a point in life when we should be able to look around and say, “I have enough.”

Enough clothes.

Enough things.

A good enough vehicle.

A comfortable enough home.

Enough possessions to live our lives without constantly chasing the next purchase.

That does not mean we stop working, dreaming, planning, or enjoying nice things. There is nothing inherently wrong with financial success or material comfort. The problem begins when we believe the next possession, promotion, house, vehicle, or dollar will somehow complete us.

Research has repeatedly found an important difference between pursuing material goals and pursuing goals involving personal growth, relationships, and contribution to others. Psychologist Tim Kasser describes materialistic values as those centered on wealth, possessions, image, and status. When these become a person’s highest priorities, they tend to conflict with goals involving relationships and personal or spiritual growth. (Annual Reviews⁠)

There is, however, another kind of contentment that can become dangerous.

We can become too content with ourselves.

We can decide that because we have reached a certain age, earned a certain degree, achieved professional success, raised children, accumulated possessions, or survived difficult seasons of life, we no longer need to change.

That is where contentment becomes complacency.

We should learn to say:

“I have enough.”

But we should be very cautious about ever saying:

“I am good enough that I no longer need to grow.”

Contentment and Complacency Are Not the Same Thing

Contentment is gratitude.

Complacency is stagnation.

Contentment says, “I appreciate what I have.”

Complacency says, “I don’t need to become better.”

Those are very different statements.

You can appreciate your home without needing a larger one and still recognize that you need to become more patient.

You can be satisfied with your income while recognizing that you need to become more generous.

You can enjoy your accomplishments while realizing that you need to become more humble.

You can be grateful for your relationships while recognizing that you need to become a better listener.

You can appreciate who you are without pretending there is nothing left to change.

Research on human motivation supports the value of this distinction. Self-Determination Theory distinguishes extrinsic aspirations—such as money, fame, appearance, and recognition—from intrinsic aspirations such as personal growth, meaningful relationships, community involvement, and health. Intrinsic goals are more closely connected to basic psychological needs and well-being. (Self Determination Theory⁠)

In studies by Kasser and Ryan, people who placed greater relative importance on intrinsic aspirations such as self-acceptance, relationships, and community reported better indicators of well-being than people whose priorities centered more heavily on financial success, appearance, and recognition. (Sage Journals⁠)

Perhaps one of the healthiest things we can learn is this:

Stop trying to constantly upgrade everything you own and begin intentionally upgrading the person who owns it.

There Is Nothing Wrong With Having Nice Things

Material possessions themselves are not the enemy. Money can feed a family. A house can provide safety. A dependable vehicle can get us to work. Savings can provide security.

A successful business can employ people and support a community. Money can be given generously to someone in need. Material resources can accomplish tremendous good. The question is not simply what we possess. The deeper question is what possesses us.

Research does not suggest that merely owning things makes someone unhappy. Rather, concerns arise when wealth, image, possessions, and status become central measures of identity and success. Kasser’s review of the literature found that giving materialistic values relatively high priority is associated with lower personal well-being and poorer interpersonal outcomes. (Annual Reviews⁠)

There is freedom in reaching the place where we can look at what someone else owns without suddenly becoming dissatisfied with what we have.

Their new vehicle does not make ours less dependable.

Their larger house does not make ours less of a home.

Their salary does not determine our worth.

Their success does not make us unsuccessful.

Someone else’s abundance does not automatically mean we are lacking.

That is contentment.

But Never Become Content With Your Character

There is a completely different standard when we turn our attention inward.

Our possessions can reach enough.

Our character should always remain under construction.

We should never reach a point where we decide:

I am patient enough.

I am compassionate enough.

I am disciplined enough.

I am forgiving enough.

I am wise enough.

I am humble enough.

I am honest enough.

I am loving enough.

I am spiritually mature enough.

There is always another lesson.There is always another rough edge that can be polished. There is always another weakness that can become stronger. There is always another opportunity to become better.

That does not mean living with constant self-criticism. Healthy personal development is not about waking every morning and deciding something is wrong with you. It is about recognizing that being a worthwhile human being today does not prevent you from becoming a better human being tomorrow.

Self-acceptance and self-improvement can exist at the same time.

The House May Be Finished, But You Are Not

Think about building a house.

Eventually the foundation is complete. The walls are finished. The roof is installed. The rooms are painted. Furniture is moved inside.

At some point, we can reasonably say:

“It is finished.”

Human character does not work that way.There is no final nail. There is no last coat of paint. There is no day when we should hang a sign on our hearts reading:

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE.

Life keeps remodeling us.

Marriage reveals things about us.

Parenthood reveals things about us.

Divorce can reveal things about us.

Friendship reveals things about us.

Leadership reveals things about us.

Failure reveals things about us.

Success reveals things about us.

Grief reveals things about us.

Conflict reveals things about us.

Getting older reveals things about us.

Even the people who irritate us sometimes reveal something about us.

Every season gives us another opportunity to examine the structure.

Sometimes we discover a crack.

Sometimes we discover something that needs reinforcing.

Sometimes we discover something that needs torn out and rebuilt.

The wise person does not become ashamed because something needs work.

The wise person does the work.

Ask Hard Questions About Yourself

Growth requires self-examination.

It is easy to identify what everybody else needs to change.

It is much harder to ask:

What do I need to change?

Where am I difficult to live with?

Do I listen, or am I simply waiting for my opportunity to speak?

Can I accept correction without becoming defensive?

Do I apologize without adding an excuse?

Do I treat people differently depending upon what they can do for me?

Do I carry grudges?

Do I speak respectfully when I am angry?

Am I dependable?

Do the people closest to me experience the same person that strangers see?

Do I practice privately what I claim to value publicly?

Those questions can be uncomfortable.

They are supposed to be.

Growth usually begins somewhere beyond our comfort.

Character Is Wealth Too

We spend enormous amounts of energy building financial wealth while sometimes overlooking another form of wealth.

Patience is wealth.

Integrity is wealth.

Wisdom is wealth.

A peaceful conscience is wealth.

Self-control is wealth.

A trustworthy reputation is wealth.

A strong marriage is wealth.

Children who know they are loved are wealth.

Friendships built over decades are wealth.

The ability to admit you were wrong is wealth.

Forgiveness is wealth.

Compassion is wealth.

Faith is wealth.

A life that made someone else’s life better is wealth.

None of those appear on a bank statement.

Yet they may ultimately become the most valuable things we possess.

Research following young adults after college found something especially interesting: achieving intrinsic aspirations involving growth, relationships, community, and health was associated with better psychological health. Achieving extrinsic aspirations, however, did not produce the same benefit and was associated in that study with indicators of ill-being. (ScienceDirect⁠)

In other words, getting what we want is not always the same thing as getting what we need.

Success Is Also a Character Test

We often think adversity tests character.

It does. But success tests character too. What happens when you have money? What happens when people know your name?What happens when you become the person making decisions?What happens when people begin calling you sir, ma’am, doctor, boss, director, president, or leader?What happens when you finally occupy the room you once dreamed of entering?

Do you remember the people who helped you get there?Do you still treat the person cleaning the room with the same dignity as the person leading the meeting?

Success can improve our circumstances without necessarily improving our character.That improvement remains our responsibility.The goal should be to climb higher without believing the climb makes us higher than other people.

Compare Yourself Differently

Materialism encourages horizontal comparison.

We look sideways.

What does he drive?

Where does she live?

How much do they earn?

Where did they vacation?

What are they wearing?

What position do they hold?

Growth asks us to make a different comparison.

Look backward.

Compare yourself with yourself.

Who were you five years ago?

Who were you last year?

Who were you yesterday?

Are you more patient?

Are you more forgiving?

Do you handle disappointment better?

Are you more dependable?

Are you less judgmental?

Can you admit when you are wrong?

Do you communicate better?

Do you love people better?

Have you learned anything from your failures?

Are you becoming wiser rather than merely older?

That is a much more meaningful measurement of success.

Never Become Too Old to Grow

One of the saddest sentences a person can say is:

“That’s just the way I am.”

Sometimes those words are presented as self-acceptance.

Often they are simply permission not to change.

Perhaps you have always had a temper.

Work on it.

Perhaps you have always struggled to communicate.

Learn.

Perhaps apologizing is difficult.

Practice.

Perhaps you interrupt people.

Listen.

Perhaps you hold grudges.

Learn forgiveness.

Perhaps you have spent years blaming everyone else.

Examine yourself.

Your past may explain something about your character.

It does not necessarily have to determine your future character.

As long as we are living, there is an opportunity to learn.

The Biblical Balance: Contentment and Growth

Scripture provides a remarkable balance between contentment and continued growth.

Paul wrote:

“But godliness with contentment is great gain.”
— 1 Timothy 6:6

Biblical contentment is not a command to abandon growth. Paul himself rejected the idea that he had spiritually arrived. In Philippians 3:12–14, he explained that he had not already reached perfection but continued pressing forward toward what lay ahead.

That gives us two important biblical ideas that belong together:

Be content with what God has provided.

Keep growing into who God is calling you to become.

We can be grateful without becoming stagnant.

We can appreciate today without believing yesterday’s growth is sufficient for tomorrow.

Conclusion: Have Enough, But Keep Becoming

There may eventually come a time when you look around your home and realize you really do not need much more.

That is a blessing.

Enjoy it.

Sit on the porch.

Drink the coffee.

Drive the vehicle you already own.

Wear the clothes already hanging in your closet.

Enjoy the people sitting around your table.

Stop believing happiness is waiting inside the next box delivered to your front door.

Say:

“Thank You, God. I have enough.”

But when you look into the mirror, maintain enough humility to say something different.

“There is still work to do.”

Not because you are worthless.

Because you are unfinished.

Become kinder.

Become wiser.

Become more patient.

Become more disciplined.

Become more forgiving.

Become more dependable.

Become more compassionate.

Become more courageous.

Become more generous.

Become more humble.

Become more loving.

Become more like Christ.

One day, you may have enough possessions.

But you should never have enough character.

Be content with what is in your hands. Be grateful for what is under your roof. But never become complacent about what is being built within your heart.

Devotion: Lord, Keep Working on Me

Scripture

“Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already arrived at my goal, but I press on…”
— Philippians 3:12

There is something deeply humbling about Paul’s words.

This was a man who had devoted his life to Christ, endured tremendous suffering for his faith, taught others, established churches, and wrote letters that would become part of the New Testament.

Yet Paul did not say:

“I have arrived.”

He said, in essence:

“I am still pressing forward.”

That should tell us something.

Christian maturity is not reaching a place where God no longer needs to work on us.

Christian maturity may actually be becoming increasingly willing to let Him work.

We can thank God for what He has already changed without pretending there is nothing left to change.

Perhaps God has helped you become more patient.

There may still be more patience to learn.

Perhaps you have learned forgiveness.

There may still be someone difficult to forgive.

Perhaps you have grown in wisdom.

There are still things you do not understand.

Perhaps your faith is stronger than it was ten years ago.

It can become stronger still.

We are simultaneously grateful for the work God has completed and available for the work He has not.

Reflection

Today, instead of asking God for another possession, another opportunity, another achievement, or another blessing, consider asking Him something different:

“Lord, what needs to change in me?”

That prayer requires courage.

The answer may involve pride.

It may involve anger.

It may involve forgiveness.

It may involve how we speak to someone.

It may involve admitting we were wrong.

It may involve becoming more generous.

It may involve surrendering something we desperately want.

But perhaps one of God’s greatest blessings is not always changing what is around us.

Sometimes His greatest work is changing what is within us.

Prayer

Heavenly Father,

Thank You for everything You have provided. Teach me to recognize when I have enough. Protect my heart from comparison, envy, greed, and the endless desire for more.

Help me enjoy the blessings already sitting around my table.

But Father, while teaching me contentment with material things, never allow me to become complacent about my character.

Show me where I need to grow.

Correct me when I am wrong.

Humble me when pride gets in the way.

Teach me patience when I become frustrated.

Teach me forgiveness when I have been hurt.

Teach me compassion when I am tempted to judge.

Teach me courage when doing what is right is difficult.

Teach me to listen more carefully, speak more wisely, love more deeply, and serve more willingly.

I do not ask You simply to give me more.

I ask You to make more of me.

Thank You for how far You have brought me.

And thank You that You are not finished with me yet.

In Jesus’ name,

Amen.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S, is a licensed clinical social worker, behavioral health professional, author, and community leader whose career has centered on helping individuals and families navigate life’s difficult seasons. His writing draws from social work, human behavior, relationships, faith, personal reflection, and the lessons that can be discovered through both success and adversity.

Collier’s articles and poetry frequently explore personal responsibility, emotional wellness, relationships, faith, healing, resilience, leadership, and the continuing process of becoming a better person. Rather than presenting growth as the pursuit of perfection, his work emphasizes self-examination, accountability, grace, compassion, and the willingness to continue learning.

At the heart of his writing is a simple belief: our experiences may shape us, but we still have a responsibility to decide what kind of people those experiences will help us become.

References

Kasser, T. (2016). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344. (Annual Reviews⁠)

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006. (Sage Journals⁠)

Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.001. (ScienceDirect⁠)

Schmuck, P., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic goals: Their structure and relationship to well-being in German and U.S. college students. Social Indicators Research, 50, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084005278. (DOI⁠)

Self-Determination Theory. (n.d.). Goals, values and aspirations. Center for Self-Determination Theory. (Self Determination Theory⁠)

The Holy Bible. 1 Timothy 6:6–8; Philippians 3:12–14; Romans 12:2; 2 Peter 1:5–8.

Judas Came from the Table: What Betrayal Can Teach Us About Love, Trust, and Healing

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

There is a statement that has been shared across social media that says, “Judas didn’t come from the crowd. He came from the table. Be careful who you call ‘family.’” The words are simple, but they carry a painful truth. Sometimes the people who hurt us the most are not strangers. They are the people we trusted enough to let into our lives. They may be family members, close friends, coworkers, church members, or people we once believed would always stand beside us.

The story of Judas Iscariot is one of the clearest biblical examples of betrayal by someone close. Judas was not simply a stranger who appeared during the final days of Jesus’ life. He was one of the twelve disciples. He traveled with Jesus, listened to His teachings, witnessed His ministry, and shared meals with Him. Yet Matthew tells us that Judas went to the chief priests and asked what they would give him if he handed Jesus over to them. They agreed on thirty pieces of silver, and Judas began looking for an opportunity to betray Him (Matthew 26:14–16).

That makes the statement about Judas coming from the table especially powerful. Betrayal usually hurts because there was trust before there was pain. A stranger can insult us, reject us, or dislike us, but betrayal is different. To betray someone, there usually must first be some form of relationship. The person has been allowed close enough to know something about us. That is why betrayal by a spouse, relative, friend, or trusted companion can hurt much more deeply than criticism from someone we barely know.

However, there is another part of the story that deserves just as much attention. Underneath the social media post was my comment response, “Yet remember, Jesus knew exactly what Judas was going to do…. And He loved him anyway.” I felt as though my thought changed the direction of the entire message. The story is no longer only about being careful who sits at our table. It becomes a lesson about how we respond when someone at our table hurts us.

According to the Gospel of John, Jesus knew that betrayal was coming. During the meal with His disciples, Jesus told them that one of them would betray Him. He later identified Judas through the giving of a piece of bread. Judas eventually left the gathering to carry out what he had planned (John 13:21–30). Jesus was not simply caught off guard by someone He thought would remain loyal. The Gospel presents Him as knowing what was coming.

This makes Jesus’ response even more meaningful. He understood Judas’ actions, yet He did not allow Judas’ betrayal to turn Him into a hateful or revengeful person. Jesus remained true to His own character. That may be one of the greatest lessons we can take from the story.

When someone betrays us, our first reaction may be anger. We may want the person to hurt as badly as we have been hurt. We may want everyone to know what happened. We may replay conversations in our minds and wonder how we missed the warning signs. Those reactions are understandable. Betrayal can affect our ability to trust, and psychological research has shown that interpersonal betrayal can be connected with significant emotional distress, especially when the betrayal involves someone upon whom a person depended or deeply trusted (Freyd, 1996; DePrince et al., 2012).

The danger comes when another person’s betrayal begins changing who we are. One painful experience can slowly convince us that nobody can be trusted. A person who was once open and loving can become suspicious of everyone. Someone who was betrayed in one relationship may enter the next relationship expecting the new person to behave exactly like the old one. Before long, we may find ourselves making innocent people pay for wounds they did not create.

This does not mean we should ignore warning signs or continue allowing harmful people unlimited access to our lives. Christianity does not require us to abandon wisdom. Love does not mean blindness, and forgiveness does not mean pretending something never happened. There is an important difference between loving someone and trusting someone.

Jesus taught His followers to love their enemies and pray for those who persecuted them (Matthew 5:44). Notice that Jesus did not tell His followers to pretend that enemies were friends. He recognized that enemies existed. His teaching concerned how His followers should respond to them. Christian love does not require us to call harmful behavior acceptable. Instead, it challenges us not to allow hatred and revenge to control our response.

We can love someone and still establish boundaries. We can forgive someone and decide that the relationship cannot return to what it once was. We can pray for someone while also recognizing that having that person closely involved in our lives may not be healthy. Forgiveness and reconciliation are related, but they are not exactly the same thing. Rebuilding a relationship normally requires honesty, responsibility, changed behavior, and participation from both people.

Trust is also different from forgiveness. Trust is usually built over time through consistent behavior. When someone repeatedly demonstrates honesty, reliability, and respect, trust grows. When that trust is seriously violated, rebuilding it may take time. Forgiving someone does not automatically mean giving that person the same access to our life that he or she had before.

This is especially important when discussing family. We often hear people say, “But they’re family,” as though being related to someone means we must accept every behavior. Family relationships can provide some of the strongest love and support we ever experience, but family relationships can also contain conflict, manipulation, dishonesty, and betrayal. Being family does not remove the need for healthy boundaries.

At the same time, we should be careful not to turn the story of Judas into a reason to become suspicious of everyone around us. If we spend our lives searching for Judas at every table, we may eventually become unable to enjoy the people who genuinely love us. Not everyone who disagrees with us is betraying us. Not everyone who disappoints us is our enemy. People make mistakes. Friends sometimes fail us. Family members sometimes say hurtful things. Healthy relationships require enough wisdom to recognize the difference between ordinary human mistakes and continuing patterns of harmful behavior.

That difference is important because fear can easily disguise itself as wisdom. After being betrayed, we may tell ourselves that we are simply being careful when we are actually becoming emotionally closed. We may build walls and call them boundaries. A healthy boundary allows us to decide what behavior we will accept while still leaving room for healthy relationships. A wall can keep everyone out, including people who might have loved us well.

The table itself can therefore become an important symbol. A table represents closeness. It is where families eat, friends talk, stories are shared, and relationships grow. Judas came from the table, but Judas was not the only person sitting there. The other disciples were there too. If we remember only Judas, we miss much of the story.

Peter was at the table, and although Peter later denied knowing Jesus, his failure did not become the end of his story. John was there. The disciples were imperfect people who would experience fear, confusion, weakness, and failure. Yet God continued working through them. The lesson is not that everyone close to us will betray us. The lesson is that relationships involve vulnerability, and vulnerability always involves some risk.

That brings us back to my response written beneath the original quotation: Jesus knew what Judas was going to do, and He loved him anyway. There is tremendous strength in those words when they are understood correctly. Loving someone anyway does not mean trusting someone anyway. It does not mean remaining in an unsafe situation. It does not mean ignoring dishonesty. It means refusing to allow another person’s wrong choices to determine the kind of person we become.

If someone lies about us, we do not have to become liars. If someone acts cruelly toward us, we do not have to become cruel. If someone abandons us, we do not have to spend the rest of our lives abandoning people before they have the chance to leave us. If someone betrays us, we do not have to become consumed by revenge.

The Apostle Paul expressed a similar principle when he wrote, “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Romans 12:21, NKJV). That verse does not deny that evil exists. It recognizes evil while warning us not to allow it to overcome us.

Perhaps that is one of the most important questions we can ask after experiencing betrayal: What is this experience turning me into?

We cannot always control what other people choose to do. We cannot force someone to be loyal. We cannot make another person tell the truth. We cannot control whether someone leaves, disappoints us, talks about us, or breaks a promise. We do have some control, however, over what we choose to do afterward.

We can learn from what happened without living inside what happened.

We can become wiser without becoming colder.

We can establish boundaries without becoming bitter.

We can remember the lesson without constantly reopening the wound.

We can forgive without pretending.

We can love without surrendering our judgment.

Research on forgiveness has suggested that forgiveness-based interventions can have positive psychological effects, including reductions in depression, anger, and stress in some populations (Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2015; Wade et al., 2014). Forgiveness should not be confused with excusing harmful behavior. Instead, it can involve gradually releasing the desire to remain emotionally controlled by the offense.

That process may take time. Some betrayals cannot simply be prayed away overnight. A person may need to grieve the relationship he or she thought existed. There may be sadness, anger, confusion, and disappointment. In serious situations, professional counseling may be helpful. Healing is not always a straight line.

There is also no shame in recognizing that some relationships have changed permanently. Sometimes reconciliation happens. Sometimes trust is rebuilt. Sometimes people accept responsibility, change their behavior, and repair what they damaged. Other times, the healthiest outcome may involve forgiveness from a distance.

Jesus’ example challenges us to consider something greater than whether the person who hurt us deserves forgiveness. It asks us to think about what carrying bitterness is doing to our own hearts.

Judas made his choice.

Jesus made His.

That distinction matters.

We may not be able to control the Judas who sits at our table, but we can decide whether his actions will control us after he leaves.

So yes, be careful who you call family. Pay attention to character. Notice patterns instead of simply listening to promises. Learn the difference between someone who makes an occasional mistake and someone who repeatedly causes harm without accepting responsibility. Establish boundaries when boundaries are needed.

But do not become so afraid of Judas that you stop inviting good people to the table.

Do not become so focused on betrayal that you stop recognizing loyalty.

Do not become so afraid of being hurt that you become unable to love.

And most importantly, do not allow what someone did to you to decide what eventually happens inside you.

The deepest lesson from Judas may not simply be that betrayal can come from someone close. Perhaps the deeper lesson is that betrayal does not have to have the final word.

Jesus knew betrayal was coming, yet He continued walking toward His purpose. Judas did not determine His identity. Judas did not change His mission. Judas did not cause Him to abandon love.

There is wisdom in being careful about who sits at your table.

There is even greater wisdom in refusing to let the person who betrays you take your peace with them when they leave.

You cannot always choose who betrays you. But you can choose what betrayal produces in you.

Choose wisdom instead of bitterness.

Choose boundaries instead of revenge.

Choose healing instead of hatred.

Choose discernment without losing compassion.

And when possible, choose the difficult freedom of loving as Christ taught us to love—not because everyone deserves unlimited access to our lives, but because no one deserves enough power over us to turn our hearts into something we were never meant to become.

References

DePrince, A. P., Chu, A. T., & Pineda, A. S. (2012). Links between specific posttrauma appraisals and three forms of trauma-related distress. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(4), 430–441.

Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2015). Forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. American Psychological Association.

Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Harvard University Press.

Holy Bible, New King James Version. (1982). Thomas Nelson. Matthew 5:44; Matthew 26:14–16; John 13:21–30; Romans 12:21.

Wade, N. G., Hoyt, W. T., Kidwell, J. E. M., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2014). Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 154–170.

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW, is a licensed clinical social worker, behavioral health professional, author, and educator whose work focuses on mental health, relationships, faith, emotional healing, personal responsibility, and human behavior. His professional experience provides a practical perspective on issues such as betrayal, boundaries, forgiveness, trauma, grief, relationships, and emotional resilience.

Through his writing, Collier seeks to connect psychological understanding with everyday experiences and Christian principles in language that people can apply to their own lives. His work often emphasizes that healing does not require people to erase their past. Instead, healing involves learning from what happened while refusing to allow yesterday’s wounds to control tomorrow’s choices.

When All You Remember Are the Bad Things in a Relationship

Why Painful Memories Can Become Stronger Than the Good Ones

Have you ever looked back at a relationship and wondered why you can only remember the bad things? Maybe you were married for many years. Maybe you dated someone for a long time. Maybe the relationship ended recently, or maybe it ended years ago. You know there had to be some good times.

There were probably times when you laughed together. You may have taken trips, celebrated birthdays, watched movies, eaten dinner together, or stayed up late talking. There may have been hugs, kisses, jokes, holidays, and ordinary days when everything seemed okay. But now, when you think about the relationship, those memories seem far away. Instead, you remember the fights.

  • You remember the hurtful words.
  • You remember feeling ignored.
  • You remember the lies.
  • You remember being disappointed.
  • You remember the times you cried.
  • You remember feeling alone, even when the other person was sitting beside you.

And you may wonder: Why can I remember everything that hurt me, but hardly remember anything good? There are several possible reasons. It does not always mean that every part of the relationship was bad. It may mean that the painful parts had a stronger effect on you. Understanding why this happens can help you understand your feelings, your memories, and yourself.

Your Memory Is Not a Video Camera

We sometimes think our memory works like a video camera. We believe our brain records everything that happens and stores it exactly the way it happened. But memory does not work that way. Our brains choose what information to notice, store, and remember. Feelings can affect this process. Stress, sadness, fear, anger, and other strong emotions can also change what we remember.

Research has shown that emotional problems can affect the way people remember events from their own lives (Williams et al., 2007). This is important when thinking about an old relationship. Imagine that you were with someone for ten years. During those ten years, you probably shared thousands of normal moments.

  • You ate meals together.
  • You watched television.
  • You drove places.
  • You went shopping.
  • You talked about work.
  • You went to bed.
  • You woke up the next morning.

Most of these normal moments may not become strong memories. But imagine that during those ten years, your partner said something very cruel during an argument. That conversation may have lasted only five minutes. Yet you might remember those five minutes for the next twenty years.

Why?

Because those five minutes hurt. The brain may give more attention to something that feels important, dangerous, painful, or emotional. So a painful memory can become stronger than hundreds of normal memories.

Our Brains Pay Attention to Danger

The human brain is designed to notice danger. This helped human beings survive for thousands of years. Imagine a person walking through the woods long ago. They see beautiful flowers beside the trail. Later, they see a dangerous animal near the same trail. Which memory is more important for survival? The dangerous animal. Remembering the flowers would be nice. Remembering the danger could save their life. We are no longer living the same way our early ancestors did, but our brains still pay attention to things that feel dangerous.

In relationships, danger is not always physical. Sometimes it is emotional.

  • Being rejected can hurt.
  • Being cheated on can hurt.
  • Being lied to can hurt.
  • Being screamed at can hurt.
  • Being made fun of can hurt.
  • Feeling unwanted can hurt.
  • Being ignored by someone you love can hurt.

If these things happen often, your brain may begin paying close attention to them. Your mind may be trying to protect you. It may be saying: “Remember this so it does not happen again.”

Bad Memories Can Feel Bigger Than Good Memories

Suppose you and your partner had a wonderful vacation. You laughed. You ate good food. You walked on the beach. You took pictures. You had fun. Years later, you may remember that it was a nice vacation, but many of the small details may disappear. Now imagine that on the last night of the vacation, you had a terrible argument. Your partner said something that broke your heart. Years later, you may have trouble remembering what you ate or where you went during the vacation. But you remember exactly where you were standing when those painful words were spoken.

You may even remember the person’s face. You may remember the room. You may remember what you were wearing. You may remember how your stomach felt. That does not mean the entire vacation was terrible. It means the painful moment had a strong emotional effect on you. Research shows that emotions can affect what we pay attention to and what we later remember (Williams et al., 2007).

Your Feelings Today Can Affect What You Remember

How you feel today can sometimes affect what you remember about yesterday. For example, when you are angry with someone, it may be easier to remember other times that person made you angry. One memory can lead to another. You remember one lie. Then another. Then another. You remember one argument. Then you remember another argument from three years earlier. Soon your mind has created a long list of everything that person ever did wrong.

The positive memories may still exist. They may simply be harder to reach at that moment. Depression can also affect the way people remember their lives. Researchers have found a connection between depression and problems remembering clear, specific personal experiences (Sumner et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2007).

This does not mean painful memories are fake. It means our current emotions can affect which memories are easiest to find.

Thinking About the Same Hurt Over and Over Makes It Stronger

Sometimes we do something called rumination. Rumination means thinking about the same upsetting situation again and again. You might think:

  • “Why did she do that?”
  • “Why did he say that?”
  • “Why didn’t I leave?”
  • “Why didn’t I notice what was happening?”
  • “Was I not good enough?”
  • “Did this person ever really love me?”
  • “What should I have said?”
  • “What would have happened if I had done something differently?”

Thinking about these questions once may help us understand what happened. Thinking about them hundreds of times may keep us stuck. Research has connected rumination with certain problems in autobiographical memory, which means memory about our own lives (Sumner, 2012).

Think about it this way. A happy event may have happened once. But you may have replayed a painful event in your mind 500 times. Each time you replay it, you give it more attention. That can make the memory easier to find.

Some Memories Stay Because There Was Never Closure

Painful memories can also remain strong when something never felt finished.

Imagine that your partner hurt you.

You told them how you felt.

  • They listened.
  • They apologized.
  • They took responsibility.
  • They changed their behavior.

Over time, you began trusting them again. Now imagine something different. You may still remember what happened, but the memory now has an ending. Your partner hurt you. You tried talking about it. They denied it. They blamed you. They refused to talk about it. Nothing changed. Then the relationship ended. You may still be asking:

  • “Why did this happen?”
  • “Why didn’t they care?”
  • “Did they understand how much they hurt me?”
  • “Why wasn’t I enough?”
  • “Was the relationship ever real?”

Your brain may keep returning to the memory because you never received an answer. But there is an important lesson here:

Sometimes closure does not come from the other person.

Sometimes you have to create your own closure.

You may never understand why someone treated you a certain way. Healing may begin when you realize you do not need every answer before you can move forward.

A Bad Ending Can Change How You Remember the Beginning

The way a relationship ends can change the way you remember the whole relationship. This can happen after cheating or another serious betrayal. Imagine discovering that your partner had been lying to you. Suddenly, you begin thinking about old memories differently. You look at an old vacation picture and wonder:

  • “Was this person lying to me then?”
  • You remember a business trip and wonder:
  • “Was that really a business trip?”
  • You remember hearing, “I love you,” and wonder:
  • “Did they really mean it?”

The memory itself has not changed. What changed is what you now know. New information can change the meaning of old memories. That can make even happy memories painful.

Sometimes Anger Is Easier Than Sadness

This can be difficult to admit. Sometimes being angry at someone feels easier than missing them. Anger can make us feel strong. Grief can make us feel weak and exposed. It may feel easier to say: “She was terrible to me.” than: “I loved her, and losing her broke my heart.”

It may feel easier to say: “He never cared about me.” than: “There were wonderful parts of our relationship, and I miss those parts.”

Both feelings can exist. You can love someone and be angry with them. You can miss someone and know you should not be together. You can forgive someone and still choose not to have them in your life. You can remember beautiful moments while also remembering terrible ones. You can admit: “I loved this person.” And also say: “This relationship was not healthy for me.” Both statements can be true.

Remembering Mostly Bad Things Does Not Automatically Mean You Have Trauma

People sometimes use the word trauma for every painful experience. Trauma is more complicated than that. A painful relationship can have a deep emotional effect without automatically causing post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD. Research has found that traumatic experiences, depression, avoidance, rumination, and memory can be connected in complicated ways (Moore & Zoellner, 2007; Sumner, 2012).

Simply remembering bad things about an old relationship does not mean you have PTSD. However, professional help may be useful if memories are causing serious problems in your daily life. For example, you may want to talk with a qualified mental health professional if memories cause strong fear, nightmares, panic, major sleep problems, constant avoidance, or serious problems in current relationships.

Depression Can Make Good Memories Harder to Find

Depression can affect more than how we feel today. It can affect how we look at yesterday. Research has found that people experiencing depression may have difficulty remembering clear and specific events from their lives (Sumner et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2007). Someone might say: “My whole marriage was terrible.” Maybe that is true. But another possibility should also be considered. Perhaps the marriage contained both good and bad experiences, but the painful memories are easier to reach right now.This is why it can help to slow down before making statements such as:

  • “Nothing was ever good.”
  • “They never loved me.”
  • “I wasted every year.”
  • “Every memory was terrible.”

Those feelings deserve to be taken seriously. But feelings and memories should also be explored carefully.

Your Mind May Be Trying to Protect You

Sometimes your mind keeps painful memories close because it wants to protect you. Imagine touching a hot stove. The pain teaches you something: Do not touch that again. Emotional pain can sometimes work in a similar way. Your brain remembers betrayal because it does not want you to be betrayed again. It remembers rejection because it wants you to notice warning signs. It remembers being controlled because it wants you to protect your freedom. It remembers being ignored because it wants you to choose someone who listens. The memory may be trying to teach you something. But there is a difference between learning from pain and living inside pain. A lesson can protect your future. Constantly replaying the hurt can steal your present.

Be Careful About Turning the Whole Relationship Into One Story

After a painful breakup or divorce, people sometimes create one simple story about the relationship.

  • “I wasted ten years.”
  • “She never loved me.”
  • “He never cared.”
  • “Everything was fake.”
  • “I was miserable every day.”

Sometimes those statements may describe someone’s true experience. But sometimes they are attempts to make a complicated relationship easier to understand. Relationships are often more complicated than “good” or “bad.” A person may have loved you and still hurt you. A person may have had good qualities and still been unhealthy for you. You may have made wonderful memories together and still needed to leave. You may have made mistakes too. Recognizing those things does not excuse harmful behavior. It simply allows you to tell yourself a more complete story.

You Do Not Have to Hate Someone to Move On

This is one of the hardest lessons after a relationship ends: You do not have to turn someone into a terrible person before you are allowed to let them go. Maybe your former partner had good qualities. Maybe they loved you in the best way they knew how. Maybe you loved them. Maybe you shared wonderful years. And maybe the relationship still needed to end. Those ideas can exist together.

  • You can say: “There were good times.” And: “There were painful times.”
  • You can say: “I loved this person.” And: “I do not want the relationship back.”
  • You can say: “I forgive what happened.” And: “I will not allow it to happen again.”
  • You can say: “I miss parts of what we had.” And: “I am happier moving forward.”

Healing does not require hating someone. Sometimes healing means seeing the whole person and the whole relationship clearly.

A Simple Exercise: Tell the Whole Story

If you can only remember the bad things, try writing down the story of your relationship.

Do not decide whether it was good or bad.

Just tell the truth.

The Beginning

Ask yourself:

  • How did we meet?
  • What did I like about this person?
  • What made me happy?
  • Why did I choose this relationship?
  • What dreams did we have?
  • What are some good memories from that time?

The Middle

Ask yourself:

  • When did things begin changing?
  • What problems appeared?
  • What was still good?
  • What became difficult?
  • What did I need that I was not getting?
  • What did my partner need?
  • What mistakes did I make?
  • What mistakes did my partner make?
  • Did we try to fix the problems?

The Ending

Ask yourself:

  • When did I realize the relationship might not survive?
  • What happened?
  • What hurt me the most?
  • What did I try to change?
  • What did the other person try to change?
  • What finally caused the relationship to end?

What Do I Miss?

Be truthful. Maybe you miss their laugh. Maybe you miss Sunday mornings. Maybe you miss traveling together. Maybe you miss having someone beside you. Missing something does not mean you should go back. It simply means something mattered to you.

What Am I Glad Is Over?

Write this down too. Maybe you no longer have to worry about arguments. Maybe you no longer feel controlled. Maybe you no longer wonder whether someone is lying. Maybe your home feels peaceful again. Recognize that freedom.

What Did I Learn?

This may be the most important question. What did the relationship teach you about love? What did it teach you about communication? What did it teach you about trust? What did it teach you about boundaries? What did it teach you about yourself? What will you do differently in your next relationship?

Ask What the Memory Is Really About

When the same painful memory keeps coming back, ask yourself: “What does this memory mean to me?”

Maybe the memory is really about rejection. Maybe it is about feeling unwanted. Maybe it is about embarrassment. Maybe it is about being abandoned. Maybe it is about feeling like you were not good enough. Maybe it is about losing trust. Sometimes the event is over, but the message you took from the event is still hurting you.

For example, your partner may have left you. That is what happened. But you may have told yourself: “They left because I am not worth loving.” That is an interpretation. Those are not the same thing. Someone leaving you does not prove that you are unlovable. Someone cheating does not prove that you were not good enough. Someone rejecting you does not decide your value. Understanding the difference between what happened and what you decided it meant about you can be an important part of healing.

Remembering the Good Does Not Mean You Want the Relationship Back

People sometimes become afraid of good memories. They think: “If I remember the good times, maybe I will want them back.” Not necessarily. Remembering is not returning. Forgiving is not forgetting. Understanding is not excusing. You can remember a wonderful Christmas together without wanting another Christmas together.

You can remember laughing on vacation without forgetting the pain that came later. You can remember being in love without believing the relationship should have lasted forever. The memory belongs to you. You do not have to destroy every good memory just because the relationship ended badly.

The Goal Is Not to Forget the Bad

Healing does not mean pretending bad things never happened. It also does not mean forcing yourself to think positively. The goal is to remember the whole story. You might eventually be able to say: “We had good times.” “We had bad times.” “I loved this person.”

  • “This person hurt me.”
  • “I hurt them sometimes too.”
  • “I made mistakes.”
  • “I learned.”
  • “I changed.”
  • “I survived the ending.”
  • “And I kept moving forward.”

That is a much stronger story than simply saying:

“Everything was terrible.”

Final Thoughts

If all you can remember about a relationship is the negative things, do not immediately assume something is wrong with you. Your memories may be showing you where you were hurt. They may be showing you what still needs attention. They may be reminding you of something you never understood. They may be connected to anger, sadness, grief, depression, rumination, or unresolved questions. Or your memories may simply be telling you that certain experiences affected you much more deeply than you realized at the time.

Do not force yourself to remember good things. Instead, become curious about the memories that remain.

Ask:

  • Why does this memory still hurt?
  • What did I lose?
  • What did I learn?
  • What am I still angry about?
  • What do I still wish had happened differently?
  • What am I afraid will happen in another relationship?
  • What do I need to forgive myself for?

And finally:

What do I want to carry forward, and what am I ready to leave behind?

Healing does not mean erasing your past. It means reaching a place where your past no longer controls your present. You can remember the hurt without living in it. You can remember the love without returning to it. You can remember the mistakes without allowing them to define you. And one day, instead of thinking only about everything that went wrong, you may be able to look back and say: “Some of it was beautiful. Some of it was painful. All of it taught me something. But it is no longer where I live.”

About the Author

John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW-S

John S. Collier is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with professional experience in behavioral health, counseling, mental health services, and helping individuals and families work through difficult life experiences.

His work focuses on helping people better understand the connection between thoughts, emotions, behaviors, relationships, and personal experiences. He has a particular interest in presenting mental health information in a way that ordinary people can understand and use in their daily lives.

Rather than treating emotional struggles as complicated ideas that can only be understood by professionals, John believes people can benefit from learning why they think, feel, and behave the way they do. Understanding does not remove every painful experience, but it can give people tools for responding to those experiences in healthier ways.

His writing often explores relationships, depression, anxiety, trauma, grief, personal growth, family relationships, communication, emotional healing, faith, and the challenges people face during major life changes.

John’s approach emphasizes an important idea: a person’s past can help explain where they are today without having to determine where they will be tomorrow.

Through education, reflection, and practical mental health tools, his goal is to help readers better understand themselves, recognize unhealthy patterns, build stronger relationships, develop healthy boundaries, and move toward greater emotional well-being.

References

Moore, S. A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2007). Overgeneral autobiographical memory and traumatic events: An evaluative review. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.419

Sumner, J. A. (2012). The mechanisms underlying overgeneral autobiographical memory: An evaluative review of evidence for the CaR-FA-X model. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.003

Sumner, J. A., Griffith, J. W., & Mineka, S. (2010). Overgeneral autobiographical memory as a predictor of the course of depression: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(7), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.013

Williams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Hermans, D., Raes, F., Watkins, E., & Dalgleish, T. (2007). Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.122

Educational Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and is not intended to diagnose or treat any mental health condition. People experiencing significant emotional distress or difficulty functioning should consider speaking with a qualified mental health professional.

Five Ways to Provide Children Stability While Living Between Two Homes

By John S. Collier, MSW, LCSW

When parents separate or divorce, one of the most significant changes for children is learning how to live between two homes. A child who once knew exactly where they would wake up each morning, where their belongings were kept, and who would be sitting at the dinner table may suddenly have to adjust to different bedrooms, schedules, expectations, and routines.

For adults, these arrangements may be described in terms of custody schedules, parenting time, visitation, or shared parenting. Children usually experience them much more personally. They may wonder, Where am I sleeping tonight? Did I leave my homework at Dad’s house? Will Mom be upset that I had fun with Dad? Who is picking me up from school? When will I see Mom again?

These questions illustrate an important principle: stability does not necessarily mean living in only one place. Stability means having enough predictability, emotional security, consistency, and dependable relationships that a child knows what to expect and knows that the adults responsible for them are going to continue caring for them.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) emphasizes that children’s adjustment following divorce or separation is influenced significantly by how parents interact before, during, and after the separation. Parents who place children’s needs ahead of their disagreements can make the transition easier. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Although every family is different, the following five strategies can help children develop a sense of security while living between two homes.

1. Create Predictable Routines in Both Homes

Children generally function better when they have some idea of what is going to happen next. Predictability creates a sense of security because children do not have to constantly anticipate changes.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends keeping children’s routines—including school, extracurricular activities, relationships, discipline, and responsibilities—as normal and unchanged as reasonably possible following separation or divorce. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

This does not mean both homes must operate identically.

One parent may serve dinner at 5:30 while the other eats at 6:30. One household may allow television before bed while another prefers reading. Children are capable of understanding that different homes have somewhat different expectations.

However, having consistency around important areas can be helpful.

For example, parents might attempt to maintain reasonably similar expectations concerning:

  • Bedtime and wake-up routines
  • Homework and school attendance
  • Medication and healthcare
  • Personal hygiene
  • Screen time
  • Chores and responsibilities
  • School-night expectations
  • Behavioral boundaries

A predictable parenting schedule can also provide reassurance. A child who knows, “Dad picks me up every Wednesday after school,” experiences something very different from a child who regularly wonders, “I don’t know where I’m going tonight.”

Visual calendars can be especially useful for younger children. Parents can place a calendar somewhere the child can easily see it and use colors, pictures, or symbols to indicate which home the child will be staying in.

Most importantly, parents should make every reasonable effort to keep promises concerning parenting time. HealthyChildren.org specifically notes that predictable weekly or monthly schedules can be comforting and emphasizes the importance of parents following through on promised visits or time together. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Children do not need every day to be identical. They need the important people in their lives to be dependable.

2. Never Make the Child Choose Between Parents

One of the greatest emotional burdens adults can unintentionally place on children is making them feel responsible for choosing one parent over another.

Children generally want permission to love both parents.

A child should not have to evaluate whether talking positively about one parent will hurt the other parent’s feelings. Likewise, children should not become messengers, investigators, negotiators, or referees between adults.

The AAP advises parents not to force children to take sides and recommends keeping disagreements and adult conversations private rather than allowing children to become involved in parental conflict. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Parents should therefore avoid questions or statements such as:

  • “Who would you rather live with?”
  • “Does your dad’s girlfriend stay there?”
  • “Tell your mother she needs to pay me.”
  • “Your father cares more about his new family than you.”
  • “I guess you’d rather be at your mom’s house.”

Even when spoken during frustration, statements like these can create a loyalty conflict. The child may begin believing that loving one parent represents betrayal of the other.

A healthier message is:

“You are allowed to love both of your parents.”

Children should also be able to enjoy themselves in the other household without guilt. If a child returns from the other parent’s home excited about going camping, attending a ballgame, visiting grandparents, or celebrating a birthday, the receiving parent can simply share the child’s excitement.

The message becomes:

“You don’t have to protect my feelings. I’m glad you had a good time.”

That response provides tremendous emotional freedom. Parents do not have to like one another to protect their child’s relationship with each parent. The goal is not necessarily friendship between former partners. The goal is creating an environment in which children are not responsible for managing adult emotions.

3. Make Both Houses Feel Like Home

There is an important difference between visiting a parent and living with a parent. Whenever practical, children who regularly spend substantial time in two households should have a sense that they belong in both places. They should not feel like permanent guests arriving with luggage every few days. Something as simple as having their own toothbrush, pajamas, clothing, school supplies, toys, books, toiletries, and personal belongings can communicate:

“You belong here.”

If circumstances allow, give the child a designated personal space. It does not necessarily have to be a private bedroom. It might be a dresser, shelf, closet, toy box, desk, or special area where the child’s belongings remain when they leave. Allowing children to personalize their space can also increase their sense of ownership.

Let them choose:

  • Bedding
  • Pictures
  • Decorations
  • Stuffed animals
  • Books
  • Nightlights
  • Posters
  • Family photographs

Parents should also consider keeping commonly forgotten necessities in both homes. Children frequently moving clothing, chargers, school supplies, medications, sports equipment, and toiletries from one household to another can become frustrated and anxious.

Whenever financially possible, duplicating inexpensive necessities can reduce this burden. Adults sometimes unintentionally make children responsible for managing the logistics of shared parenting. A seven-year-old should not experience a crisis because they forgot their school shoes at the other parent’s house.

The adults should carry as much of the logistical responsibility as reasonably possible. This principle extends beyond physical belongings. Children need emotional belonging as well. Photographs of the other parent do not necessarily need to disappear from a child’s room simply because the parents are no longer together. Children should generally be allowed to talk about their other home, siblings, stepparents, grandparents, and experiences without feeling that certain subjects are forbidden. Two homes can be very different and still communicate the same fundamental message:

“This is your home, too.”

4. Protect Children From Adult Conflict

Parents do not have to agree about everything to successfully raise a child between two homes. They do, however, need to recognize that repeated exposure to adult conflict can make an already difficult transition significantly harder. AAP guidance recommends that parents discuss disagreements privately, avoid fighting where children can hear them, and refrain from involving children in parental arguments. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

This includes more than face-to-face arguments. Children can also be exposed to conflict through:

  • Angry telephone conversations
  • Hostile text messages they are allowed to see
  • Social-media posts
  • Criticism from extended family members
  • Arguments during exchanges
  • Sarcastic comments
  • Questioning children about the other household
  • Asking children to deliver messages
  • Complaining about child support or finances

One particularly harmful dynamic occurs when the child becomes the communication system between parents.

  • “Tell your dad you’re staying here Friday.”
  • “Ask your mother why she hasn’t answered me.”
  • “Tell Dad you need money for your uniform.”

Children should not be responsible for carrying adult information across household lines.

Whenever possible, adults should communicate directly through phone calls, text messages, email, co-parenting applications, mediators, or other appropriate channels. When communication between parents is extremely difficult, reducing unnecessary interaction may sometimes be more realistic than attempting to create a close co-parenting relationship. The objective should remain the same: reduce the child’s exposure to conflict.

Parents can also make transitions deliberately uneventful. Exchanges do not need to become opportunities to revisit disagreements. A simple: “Have a great weekend. I love you. I’ll see you Monday.” may provide much greater security than an emotional goodbye followed by an argument in the driveway. Children watch adults carefully. When parents communicate that transitions are safe and manageable, children receive permission to experience them that way as well.

5. Give Children Permission to Talk About Their Feelings

A child can love both parents and still dislike living between two homes. Both things can be true. Children may experience sadness, anger, confusion, excitement, guilt, relief, anxiety, or frustration—and sometimes several of those emotions at once.

Younger children may have difficulty explaining these emotions verbally. Their distress may instead appear through tantrums, sleep difficulties, clinginess, regression, irritability, or changes in eating. School-aged children may demonstrate anger, distraction, academic problems, or mood changes. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Rather than immediately correcting the emotion, parents can become curious about it. If a child says:

“I hate going back and forth.”

A parent may instinctively respond:

“You shouldn’t say that. You’re lucky both of us love you.”

Although well intended, that response can close the conversation. A more supportive response might be:

“Going back and forth can be hard sometimes. What is the hardest part for you?”

Perhaps the problem is not the other parent at all. The child might say:

“I always forget my stuff.”

“I miss my dog.”

“I don’t sleep well there.”

“I hate packing.”

“I miss you when I’m gone.”

Now the parent has information that may lead to a practical solution. The AAP recommends giving children opportunities to express their feelings and helping them understand that they did not cause the divorce or separation. Children also benefit from reassurance that their parents’ love and care for them will continue. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠) One of the most powerful messages a parent can repeatedly communicate is: “The problems between the adults are adult problems. You did not cause them, and you are not responsible for fixing them.”

Stability Is More Emotional Than Geographical

Parents sometimes fear that living between two homes automatically means children will have unstable lives. That does not have to be the case. A child’s stability is created through relationships, routines, expectations, emotional safety, and dependable caregiving—not simply through an address. Two homes can provide stability when the adults surrounding the child consistently communicate:

  • “You are safe.”
  • “You are loved.”
  • “You know what happens next.”
  • “You are allowed to love both parents.”
  • “The adults will handle the adult problems.”
  • “You can talk to me about how you feel.”

The transition following separation or divorce is a process rather than a single event, and children’s reactions may change as they grow and understand their family circumstances differently. The American Academy of Pediatrics therefore encourages parents and professionals to remain attentive to children’s emotional and behavioral responses over time. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

Parents should pay particular attention to significant or persistent changes such as declining school performance, social withdrawal, severe anxiety, sleep disturbances, prolonged sadness, aggression, physical complaints without an obvious medical explanation, or other substantial changes in functioning. When concerns become significant, consultation with the child’s pediatrician or an appropriately qualified mental-health professional may be beneficial. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Ultimately, successful shared parenting is not measured by whether two households have identical rules, furniture, resources, or parenting styles. It is measured by whether the child experiences both homes as places where adults are dependable and love does not have to be divided. Children should never feel that they are carrying two separate lives in two separate suitcases. They should be able to understand something much healthier:

“I have one life, one childhood, and two places where I belong.”

References

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Helping children and families deal with divorce and separation. Pediatrics, 138(6), e20163020. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Parting ways: New report on divorce addresses pediatricians’ role. AAP News. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)

HealthyChildren.org. (2026). Divorce and separation: How to help your child adjust. American Academy of Pediatrics. (HealthyChildren.org⁠)

Hetherington, E. M. (2005). Divorce and the adjustment of children. Pediatrics in Review, 26(5), 163–169. (American Academy of Pediatrics⁠)